Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
22 minutes ago, PetermansRedemption said:

How about we just don’t “crush them” at the cost of millions of American lives to defend an indefensible island. 

 

 

850 billion dollars A YEAR in defense spending. Whose gonna argue with that. 

 

Time we flex our muscles a little. Send pelosi to Taiwan 

 

 

Posted

Has it been put out there Why she decided to go? What is the reason for leaving her comfort zone here? No other country, including ours, takes her or joey seriously anyways.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
28 minutes ago, T&C said:

Has it been put out there Why she decided to go? What is the reason for leaving her comfort zone here? No other country, including ours, takes her or joey seriously anyways.

 

 

China is not the alpha, get that idea out of your head. 

 

That's why she's going 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, TSOL said:

 

 

China is not the alpha, get that idea out of your head. 

 

That's why she's going 

Why not someone with a stable mindset then? Why send the weak?

Posted
7 hours ago, TSOL said:

 

 

850 billion dollars A YEAR in defense spending. Whose gonna argue with that. 

 

Time we flex our muscles a little. Send pelosi to Taiwan 

 

 

I’d be much more impressed with that figure if I didn’t realize we’ve spend 23 million dollars perfecting the Mil-Spec for the appropriate chocolate chip density and cookie dough shade of brown in a standard issue chocolate chip cookie. 

Posted
Just now, T&C said:

Why not someone with a stable mindset then? Why send the weak?

 

 

Look into the armada that is following her there. The sheer hardware alone that we are sending to accompany her on her trip. The ships we are sending alone are a more powerful military might than the majority of the countries in the world could dream of.

 

The Ronald Reagan and it's entire supporting cast. Ok china, you wanna talk about playing with fire? 

 

 

4 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

I’d be much more impressed with that figure if I didn’t realize we’ve spend 23 million dollars perfecting the Mil-Spec for the appropriate chocolate chip density and cookie dough shade of brown in a standard issue chocolate chip cookie. 

 

 

Have you ever seen a Russian aircraft carrier? The Yugo of the sea? 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
On 7/28/2022 at 3:30 PM, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

China has been eating our lunch for decades, here, in this country.  We have a president alleged to have ties to China though his dopey son, a person who would be very easily co-opted by a foreign adversary based on just about every waking moment of his hooker-stripping-drug-fueled-brother's-wife-banging life. 

 

The silly symbolism of one old lady and her gang of dunces visiting Taiwan means nothing.  

Oh, sure, it is  1926 after all. :doh:

 

Said message can be succinctly delivered in thought, word and deed 365 days a year.  

It apparently means a lot to China...

Posted
9 minutes ago, TSOL said:

Look into the armada that is following her there. The sheer hardware alone that we are sending to accompany her on her trip. The ships we are sending alone are a more powerful military might than the majority of the countries in the world could dream of.

 

The Ronald Reagan and it's entire supporting cast. Ok china, you wanna talk about playing with fire? 

What is she trying to actually do though? What is the point of her heading over to that part of the world? Are we just leaking more money for nothing? What exactly is her mission?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, TSOL said:

 

 

Look into the armada that is following her there. The sheer hardware alone that we are sending to accompany her on her trip. The ships we are sending alone are a more powerful military might than the majority of the countries in the world could dream of.

 

The Ronald Reagan and it's entire supporting cast. Ok china, you wanna talk about playing with fire? 

 

 

 

 

Have you ever seen a Russian aircraft carrier? The Yugo of the sea? 

Sure, but like the Yugo it’s 15 times cheaper than a Cadillac and effectively does the same thing, just less comfortably…

Posted
8 minutes ago, T&C said:

What is she trying to actually do though? What is the point of her heading over to that part of the world? Are we just leaking more money for nothing? What exactly is her mission?

 

She's covering for Demented Biden and his buddies global mess.  Distraction politics.  Nothing more.  What a mess.  

Posted
16 minutes ago, T&C said:

What is she trying to actually do though? What is the point of her heading over to that part of the world? Are we just leaking more money for nothing? What exactly is her mission?

 

 

There is immense significant in our and the free worlds relationship with Taiwan. The fact that they manufacture 90% of computer chips in the world. 

 

We don't want those computer chip manufacturers to be under CCP control, for obvious reasons. 

 

 

 

Taiwan needs to stay democratic 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, TSOL said:

 

 

There is immense significant in our and the free worlds relationship with Taiwan. The fact that they manufacture 90% of computer chips in the world. 

 

We don't want those computer chip manufacturers to be under CCP control, for obvious reasons. 

 

 

 

Taiwan needs to stay democratic 

So we send nancy? We might as well have sent Laurel and Hardy.

Posted
5 minutes ago, T&C said:

So we send nancy? We might as well have sent Laurel and Hardy.

 

 

Who do you want them to send? Rambo?

 

She's perfect for this job. This is a total FU to China, it's epic and I love this move 

Posted
6 minutes ago, TSOL said:

 

 

Who do you want them to send? Rambo?

 

She's perfect for this job. This is a total FU to China, it's epic and I love this move 

Why did we have to send anyone? No one talks on phones, zooms, other methods? This isn't a job, it's just an expensive political journey to no where for nothing. Poke a bear thing? Makes no sense. My question is why did we need to send anyone to that part of the world... no real answer.

Posted
12 minutes ago, T&C said:

Why did we have to send anyone? No one talks on phones, zooms, other methods? This isn't a job, it's just an expensive political journey to no where for nothing. Poke a bear thing? Makes no sense. My question is why did we need to send anyone to that part of the world... no real answer.

 

 

China has been too aggressive with them lately. We are going there to reassure Taiwan and make a statement to China. 

 

If China attacks Taiwan, it'll be like they attacked New York. We are going to war. It's that important  

Posted
4 minutes ago, TSOL said:

 

 

China has been too aggressive with them lately. We are going there to reassure Taiwan and make a statement to China. 

 

If China attacks Taiwan, it'll be like they attacked New York. We are going to war. It's that important  

So we send nancy pelosi for something this " important"? She can barely decide what flavor of ice cream to serve to her grandchildren.

×
×
  • Create New...