leh-nerd skin-erd Posted July 27, 2022 Posted July 27, 2022 This is interesting. Midterms just a few months out. 1/6 committee signaling the need for additional prime-time tribunals during…the mid-terms. News reports from the usual suspects (WaPo, NBC) beginning to circulate about “investigations” based on “anonymous sources” ….100 days out from the mid-terms. Who could have predicted this stunning turn of events? 1 1 2
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted July 27, 2022 Posted July 27, 2022 13 minutes ago, Doc said: Now they've got him... Soon enough, reporters will be reporting what reporters reported when reporting on reports reported anonymously. 1 1
Tiberius Posted July 27, 2022 Posted July 27, 2022 35 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: This is interesting. Midterms just a few months out. 1/6 committee signaling the need for additional prime-time tribunals during…the mid-terms. News reports from the usual suspects (WaPo, NBC) beginning to circulate about “investigations” based on “anonymous sources” ….100 days out from the mid-terms. Who could have predicted this stunning turn of events? Well, he deserves to go to jail for what he did 1
All_Pro_Bills Posted July 27, 2022 Posted July 27, 2022 5 minutes ago, DRsGhost said: The entire DOJ story is all smoke and no fire. Which is par for the course with the US media. They manufacture "news" (DOJ has said to have asked) that fits the predetermined policy narrative rather than gather facts and intelligence to create and draw conclusions. 1
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted July 27, 2022 Posted July 27, 2022 1 minute ago, Tiberius said: Well, he deserves to go to jail for what he did That’s what they are reporting, or actually, pre-reporting, or actually pre-alledging. Anonymously, but firmly, sort of. First time ever. 1
Tiberius Posted July 27, 2022 Posted July 27, 2022 Just now, leh-nerd skin-erd said: That’s what they are reporting, or actually, pre-reporting, or actually pre-alledging. Anonymously, but firmly, sort of. First time ever. He's a friggin criminal, so ya 4 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said: The entire DOJ story is all smoke and no fire. Which is par for the course with the US media. They manufacture "news" (DOJ has said to have asked) that fits the predetermined policy narrative rather than gather facts and intelligence to create and draw conclusions. He's screwed. He's being sued, grand juries have been convened at state and federal level. He's a scum bag and needs jail time 2 1
All_Pro_Bills Posted July 27, 2022 Posted July 27, 2022 3 minutes ago, Tiberius said: He's screwed. He's being sued, grand juries have been convened at state and federal level. He's a scum bag and needs jail time Its all allegations to this point. Most of which is being pursued by aggressive and partisan DA's with an axe to grind. You don't know any better than I do what "real" evidence there is here. Most of what this committee calls evidence is inadmissible hearsay in a court setting. But when it comes to Trump you and a few other posters have a penchant for jumping to conclusions without any verified facts. Your hatred and emotion is getting in the way of logical thinking. If he's guilty then he's guilty, that's for a court to decide. But I've heard no verdict from any court to this point. And as for 1/6, they've yet to discover anything resembling evidence pointing to some mastermind plan of some grand conspiracy and coordination of some criminal plot. What I here is talk of people talking options and dismissing most of them and doing nothing with the rest outside of some legal appeals which is perfectly acceptable given election procedures and protocols.
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted July 27, 2022 Posted July 27, 2022 How many tens of millions of taxpayer money has been spent going after trump with zero results? Who’s going to get thrown is jail for that crime… ?? abuse of power, embezzlement collusion, corruption and general dereliction of duty. How the hell could this many attempts come up empty handed? 1
Tiberius Posted July 27, 2022 Posted July 27, 2022 9 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said: Its all allegations to this point. Most of which is being pursued by aggressive and partisan DA's with an axe to grind. You don't know any better than I do what "real" evidence there is here. Most of what this committee calls evidence is inadmissible hearsay in a court setting. But when it comes to Trump you and a few other posters have a penchant for jumping to conclusions without any verified facts. Your hatred and emotion is getting in the way of logical thinking. If he's guilty then he's guilty, that's for a court to decide. But I've heard no verdict from any court to this point. And as for 1/6, they've yet to discover anything resembling evidence pointing to some mastermind plan of some grand conspiracy and coordination of some criminal plot. What I here is talk of people talking options and dismissing most of them and doing nothing with the rest outside of some legal appeals which is perfectly acceptable given election procedures and protocols. No, the evidence has been laid out, he stirred up a mob that got people killed. That in and of itself is enough 1
BillStime Posted July 27, 2022 Author Posted July 27, 2022 14 minutes ago, Tiberius said: No, the evidence has been laid out, he stirred up a mob that got people killed. That in and of itself is enough Wrong Tibs - there was no cross examination so the whole thing is “horseshit” per the usual cult members. 1
All_Pro_Bills Posted July 27, 2022 Posted July 27, 2022 (edited) 17 minutes ago, Tiberius said: No, the evidence has been laid out, he stirred up a mob that got people killed. That in and of itself is enough Well we'll just have to see if what you characterize as "stirred up" constitutes legal liability for the actions of others along with evidence of such intentions. Or if more likely, nothing happens. 1 minute ago, BillStime said: Wrong Tibs - there was no cross examination so the whole thing is “horseshit” per the usual cult members. Finally, you got something right! Hell has frozen over. Edited July 27, 2022 by All_Pro_Bills 1
Tiberius Posted July 27, 2022 Posted July 27, 2022 5 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said: Well we'll just have to see if what you characterize as "stirred up" constitutes legal liability for the actions of others along with evidence of such intentions. Or if more likely, nothing happens. Finally, you got something right! Hell has frozen over. Oh ya, stirring up a murderous riot is a crime 1
All_Pro_Bills Posted July 27, 2022 Posted July 27, 2022 (edited) 8 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Oh ya, stirring up a murderous riot is a crime Keep on believing the leftist wet dream. Edited July 27, 2022 by All_Pro_Bills 1
Tiberius Posted July 27, 2022 Posted July 27, 2022 1 minute ago, All_Pro_Bills said: Keep on believing the leftist wet dream. You have to be a leftist to believe stirring up a deadly riot is a crime? What are you smoking this morning? 1 1
All_Pro_Bills Posted July 27, 2022 Posted July 27, 2022 7 minutes ago, Tiberius said: You have to be a leftist to believe stirring up a deadly riot is a crime? What are you smoking this morning? There was only one person murdered and the shooter got away with it.
Recommended Posts