ChiGoose Posted July 28, 2022 Share Posted July 28, 2022 2 hours ago, 716er said: Anything signed by Jim Jordan has zero credibility. There are also zero quotes from any of the whistleblowers in Jim's letter. “Jim Jordan covered up sexual abuse and is somehow incapable of wearing a suit coat, but he’s a totally trusty source whenever his lunatic rantings match my conspiracy of the moment” -Idiots. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted July 28, 2022 Author Share Posted July 28, 2022 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted July 28, 2022 Author Share Posted July 28, 2022 11 hours ago, billsfan_34 said: We can all go “round and round” but can we at least agree the FBI, DOJ, Homeland Security et al are corrupt to the corps? A good start to getting any faith in our government agencies would be a top to bottom review by those on both sides of the aisle…tall order I know. At minimum, I would settle for Hunter being brought to trial, but that is probably a stretch to. Guess I shall get back to working and paying my taxes without representation lol No, you will never get leftists to admit these agencies are even a little bit corrupt. The FBI is punishing their political opponents, how can that be corrupt? The minute that they actually indict Hunter Biden however, I promise you it will be spun as a political witch hunt. The corruption is as plain as day to those of is who live in the real world, they however live in a world where the sky is green. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted July 28, 2022 Author Share Posted July 28, 2022 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 28, 2022 Share Posted July 28, 2022 (edited) Shameful. We’ve heard a lot about domestic violent extremism and domestic terrorism during the Biden administration — in particular, that white supremacists are the largest domestic terror threat. We’ve heard this from both President Joe Biden and Attorney General Merrick Garland. The House Judiciary Republicans, however, say that whistleblowers claim the FBI is pressuring agents to reclassify cases as domestic violent terrorism to pump up the numbers. They write: New whistleblower information reveals that FBI officials are pressuring agents to reclassify cases as “domestic violent extremism” (DVE) despite lacking the criteria to meet such a classification. Whistleblower disclosures have also detailed the agency’s effort to exaggerate DVE data to satisfy the Bureau’s leadership. One whistleblower explained that because agents are not finding enough DVE cases, they are encouraged and incentivized to change designations even though there is minimal, circumstantial evidence to support the reclassification. Another whistleblower—with experience in high profile domestic terrorism investigations—stated that a field office Counterterrorism Assistant Special Agent in Charge and the FBI’s Director of the Counterterrorism Division have forced agents to recategorize cases as DVE to hit performance metrics manufactured by the Bureau itself. According to whistleblowers, the FBI uses these metrics to dispense awards and determine promotions. Every whistleblower has called it an environment of “pressure” within the FBI. These whistleblower disclosures come as the Biden Administration pushes a narrative that domestic violent extremism is the “greatest threat” facing the United States. So there are quotas for domestic violent extremism cases? https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2022/07/27/house-judiciary-gop-fbi-pressuring-agents-to-reclassify-cases-as-domestic-violent-extremism/ Edited July 28, 2022 by B-Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 28, 2022 Share Posted July 28, 2022 . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted July 28, 2022 Share Posted July 28, 2022 👆🤡🤣 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted July 29, 2022 Author Share Posted July 29, 2022 Yep. Out the whistle-blowers and destroy them. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
716er Posted July 29, 2022 Share Posted July 29, 2022 It would behoove this whistleblower investigation to release one quote from any of the "highly credible" whistleblowers. The idea of soliciting whistleblowers is also a bit odd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted July 29, 2022 Share Posted July 29, 2022 29 minutes ago, 716er said: It would behoove this whistleblower investigation to release one quote from any of the "highly credible" whistleblowers. The idea of soliciting whistleblowers is also a bit odd. I love this place. While I’ve used the word now and again, I’m not sure I’ve ever actually written ‘behoove’. Well done. 👍 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeviF Posted July 29, 2022 Share Posted July 29, 2022 1 hour ago, 716er said: The idea of soliciting whistleblowers is also a bit odd. In the great state of NY there is a monthly email soliciting whistleblowers who witness discriminatory actions against protected class individuals sent to every employee. Presumably this justifies the several dozen full time salaries at the GOER ADID who otherwise do nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
716er Posted July 29, 2022 Share Posted July 29, 2022 24 minutes ago, LeviF said: In the great state of NY there is a monthly email soliciting whistleblowers who witness discriminatory actions against protected class individuals sent to every employee. Presumably this justifies the several dozen full time salaries at the GOER ADID who otherwise do nothing. Can you post the email for context? Are they soliciting whistleblowers or asking employees to speak up if they witness discrimination? There's a distinction between the two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeviF Posted July 29, 2022 Share Posted July 29, 2022 8 minutes ago, 716er said: Can you post the email for context? Are they soliciting whistleblowers or asking employees to speak up if they witness discrimination? There's a distinction between the two. It’s specifically soliciting information regarding protected class discrimination in the state workplace. That’s literally whistleblowing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
716er Posted July 29, 2022 Share Posted July 29, 2022 4 minutes ago, LeviF said: It’s specifically soliciting information regarding protected class discrimination in the state workplace. That’s literally whistleblowing. Do you see that as a problem? Again, if you could even copy/paste the text of the email that would help give this context. Do you see what Grassley's office is doing as a problem? Or do you only see one of the two as a problem? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeviF Posted July 29, 2022 Share Posted July 29, 2022 Just now, 716er said: Do you see that as a problem? Again, if you could even copy/paste the text of the email that would help give this context. Do you see what Grassley's office is doing as a problem? Or do you only see one of the two as a problem? I don't see either as a problem, I just found your assertion that soliciting whistleblowers is odd to be kind of silly on its face. I did my time in a snitch unit, we had posters up encouraging people to report internal malfeasance and bad acts in the workplace. Granted, these are all general, blanket solicitations but as a matter of course you're trying to compile as much evidence as possible in any case that may require disciplinary measures. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted July 29, 2022 Share Posted July 29, 2022 (edited) Not odd. Unless you're worried about them finding something, that is... Edited July 29, 2022 by Doc 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 29, 2022 Share Posted July 29, 2022 3 hours ago, 716er said: The idea of soliciting whistleblowers is also a bit odd. It's not odd. US offers $10M reward for Russian election interference info WASHINGTON (AP) — The State Department on Thursday offered a reward of up to $10 million for information about Russian interference in American elections, including a close associate of Russian President Vladimir Putin and a troll farm that officials say fueled a divisive social media campaign in 2016. The reward, offered by the department’s Rewards for Justice program, seeks information about the Internet Research Agency, Yevgeniy Prigozhin — a wealthy businessman whose ties to Putin earned him the nickname “Putin Chef” — and other entities involved in interfering in the 2016 U.S. election won by Republican Donald Trump. https://apnews.com/article/2022-midterm-elections-russia-ukraine-putin-donald-trump-8ceb88c3c29f75a459a7e0a3b6cd929c Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsfan_34 Posted July 31, 2022 Share Posted July 31, 2022 On 7/28/2022 at 7:23 AM, DRsGhost said: No, you will never get leftists to admit these agencies are even a little bit corrupt. The FBI is punishing their political opponents, how can that be corrupt? The minute that they actually indict Hunter Biden however, I promise you it will be spun as a political witch hunt. The corruption is as plain as day to those of is who live in the real world, they however live in a world where the sky is green. I agree - and because of this, most Americans have no faith in our elected officials and government agencies. I hope Hunter goes down and no matter what narrative is told, justice is served. He is a little piss pot crackhead sex addict traitor that got kicked out of the Navy before it even started cuz he couldn’t keep coke out of his body. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted July 31, 2022 Author Share Posted July 31, 2022 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted August 1, 2022 Share Posted August 1, 2022 ONE CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION COLLUDES WITH ANOTHER: Democrats and the FBI Collude Again on a Russia Smear against Republicans: This time, they’ve been able to turn Democratic collusion with foreign powers into an illusion of disinformation. Not since Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers has a couple gone cheek-to-cheek quite like Democrats and the FBI. This spring, we watched special counsel John Durham’s first Russiagate trial blow up on him, not because he lacked evidence of a 2016 fraudulent scheme to portray Donald Trump as a clandestine agent of the Kremlin, but because he portrayed one of the two main schemers, the FBI, as if it were a victim. In Durham’s indictment, the Clinton campaign lies to the bureau’s babes in the woods, gulling them into opening a baseless foreign-counterintelligence probe of whether her Republican rival is a Putin puppet. In Durham’s proof at trial, however, top FBI officials turn out to be fully aware that they are colluding with Clinton campaign operatives in exploiting political opposition research to try to nail Trump — and then labor to cover their tracks. It’s an unfortunate blind spot. Durham has one conviction so far: a guilty plea from FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith, whose manipulation of a document caused the FISA court to be deceived into granting a surveillance warrant to monitor a former Trump campaign adviser — again, substantially based on the Clinton campaign’s bogus opposition research. Except the case wasn’t charged as a fraud on the court. It was charged as a false statement to another FBI official. Yes, it seems even when the FBI itself lies, the victim is . . . the FBI. And now we learn how adaptable the Democrat–FBI Russia two-step is: You can run it in reverse! Not only can the scheme distort actual disinformation into an illusion of Republican collusion with foreign powers. It also can turn actual Democratic collusion with foreign powers into an illusion of disinformation. Now, that’s some choreography, right there. We’ve written a good bit about how Democrats and the Biden campaign, aided and abetted by their collaborators in media, social media, and the distressingly partisan network of current and former government national-security officials (pillars of the so-called Deep State, which I am going to have to stop describing as “so-called”), tried to con the country into believing Hunter Biden’s patently authentic “Laptop from Hell” was Russian disinformation. Well, now we see the fuller picture of how, far from pulling this tall tale out of the sky when the New York Post exposed the Hunter laptop in October 2020, these operatives simply incorporated it into a Biden campaign narrative that Democrats and pliant FBI officials had concocted two months earlier. FBI Knew That Fear the Bidens Were Compromised Was Not Based on Disinformation Republicans controlled the Senate in the 116th Congress in 2019, when Chairman Chuck Grassley (R., Iowa) of the Finance Committee and Chairman Ron Johnson (R., Wis.) of the Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs began probing the Biden family business of cashing in on Joe’s political influence. The focus was fishy foreign financial transactions. By then, the Justice Department and the FBI had been onto Hunter’s shenanigans for a year — again, long before the laptop’s existence emerged. The government’s national-security apparatus had every reason to know the Bidens were compromised. As I’ve detailed, one of the family’s most lucrative deals had it partnering with a Shanghai-based conglomerate called CEFC, which turned out to be a Chinese intelligence operation. This is the deal where Joe Biden — “the big guy” — was to get a 10 percent cut . . . which may explain why he was so relieved that a New York Times exposé seemed only minimally damaging that he called Hunter (the son with whom he never talked business, no siree) to opine that Hunter was “in the clear.” Among CEFC’s key executives was Patrick Ho, once described by Hunter as “the f***ing spy chief of China.” Ho was prosecuted by the Justice Department on foreign-corruption charges. Months before his arrest, CEFC’s top executive (and Xi Jinping protégé) Ye Jianming paid Hunter $1 million to snoop around and try to find out what the government had on Ho. That turned out to be a lot. In February 2018, federal prosecutors advised the defense that Hunter’s client, Ho, had been the subject of national-security surveillance under FISA. Within a week of this notice, the Chinese regime arrested Ye. He has not been seen in public since, and the regime quietly let the multibillion-dollar conglomerate go bust. The Bidens were being lavishly paid by CEFC: It is documented that $6 million went into the family coffers. https://www.nationalreview.com/2022/07/democrats-and-the-fbi-collude-again-on-a-russia-smear-against-republicans/ Worst, most corrupt, president ever. And the worst, most corrupt FBI and Justice Department and national security bureaucracy ever — along with the worst, most corrupt media ever. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts