BillsFanNC Posted May 7 Author Posted May 7 This image was leaked to the media following the RAID of Mar a Lago, the first time such a dramatic action was taken against a former president. But it turns out those "classified" cover sheets were paper clipped on top of documents by the FBI. But it gets worse. In their haste to paint Trump as a criminal, the Special counsel now concedes that some "top secret" cover sheets do not even match the relevant document! In other words they created a photo op, and it's not even accurate. They lied. They leaked. They smeared. Just like with the Russia Hoax. Just like with the impeachment hoax. Just like with every other case against Trump. What an absolute dumpster fire.
BillsFanNC Posted May 16 Author Posted May 16 Even if the Biden WH had nothing to do with Trump lawfare (they do) this is incredibly inappropriate. But bringing back the adults and decency...or something. 1
BillsFanNC Posted May 22 Author Posted May 22 After Russiagate, the fedsurrection, the J6 committee destroying evidence, the raid on MAR-A-LAGO, 4 arrests, 92 felony charges, indicting election lawyers with RICO charges, calling parents at school boards terrorists, pulling out suitcases stuffed with ballots from under the tables, and the Manhattan show trial, if you are STILL buying the deep state line of "this was all standard procedure" you're a MORON or you're part of the problem.
daz28 Posted May 23 Posted May 23 10 hours ago, BillsFanNC said: You'd think by 90 years old you'd know what totally berserk meant. Then again to his ancient self, swatting a fly off your shoulder is going berserk. Let's make it about the judge and not Costello or trump. Thanks Al. LOL
Joe Ferguson forever Posted May 31 Posted May 31 5 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: Why do you all need an instruction to stay legal? Isn't that a minimum requirement?
ChiGoose Posted May 31 Posted May 31 Remember the golden rule of conservatism: “There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.” They’re mad because the law is binding someone on the in-group and that is unacceptable to them. 1
B-Man Posted May 31 Posted May 31 12 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: Remember the golden rule of conservatism: “There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.” They’re mad because the law is binding someone on the in-group and that is unacceptable to them. Wrong thread Goose You just proved this one. The Iron Law Of Dem/Woke/Commie Projection: Accuse Your Opponent Of What You Are Doing https://www.twobillsdrive.com/community/topic/253011-the-iron-law-of-demwokecommie-projection-accuse-your-opponent-of-what-you-are-doing/page/8/#comment-9082425 1
Recommended Posts