Jump to content

Impact of Dobbs and Abortion Laws

ChiGoose
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

ChiGoose
ChiGoose

Since there are people out there who think that Dobbs v. Jackson Woman's Health Organization will only impact people seeking abortions for unwanted pregnancies, I thought it might be a good idea to se

All_Pro_Bills
All_Pro_Bills

Ironically, radical Democrats run and hide for cover when you ask them the simple question, "what is a women"?  But they'll fight tooth and nail over abortion issue to protect the rights of this incom

B-Man
B-Man

Oh.   Really ?       They lied about the law .   What a surprise.   .

Posted Images

AlBUNDY4TDS Veteran

AlBUNDY4TDS

Posted
Posted
On 8/25/2023 at 12:57 PM, BillStime said:

 

Only idiots would donate to a Trump PAC which is under DOJ investigation for wire fraud and money laundering.

 

Did you donate money to Bannon’s Build the Wall charity, too?

 

Tell us you’re an idiot without actually telling us. 

You calling anyone an idiot is beyond rich. Holy hell can u get anymore broken?

  • Agree 2
B-Man Hall of Famer

B-Man

Posted
Posted (edited)

 

 

If I may offer my two cents.

 

Abortion and the grief that follows is much too important a subject to discuss with a child  like BillStime.

 

 

.

 

 

.

Edited by B-Man
  • Thank you (+1) 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Tiberius Hall of Famer

Tiberius

Posted
Posted
On 8/24/2023 at 11:06 AM, SCBills said:

I’m really not sure why the GOP can’t just repackage Nikki Haley’s answer on this and neutralize the issue. 
 

It’s a states rights debate. 
 

South Carolina, Georgia, Florida all have heartbeat bans because the citizens of those states are either in support of/or, at least, ok with it. 
 

Cali & NY, the opposite. 
 

This was the point of overturning Roe. 
 

Now, if you’re pro-life, it’s about winning the debate locally in those blue states. 
 

The only issues Dems have going for them are abortion and Trump… and the GOP base is determined to give them both. 

Oh really? Well a president appoints judges, and they will be ruling on abortion issues. So it very much is an issue to hurt Republicans 

BillStime Hall of Famer

BillStime

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Oh really? Well a president appoints judges, and they will be ruling on abortion issues. So it very much is an issue to hurt Republicans 


Exactly… if it’s a state issue - why is the GQP in Washington anxious to pass a federal abortion ban? 

Tiberius Hall of Famer

Tiberius

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, BillStime said:


Exactly… if it’s a state issue - why is the GQP in Washington anxious to pass a federal abortion ban? 

They can'y help themselves. They created this monster and can't stop pushing this 

 

  • Agree 1
Tiberius Hall of Famer

Tiberius

Posted
Posted

Earlier this year, Jennifer Adkins learned during a 12-week ultrasound that her second child — nicknamed “Spooky” because she was due near Halloween — was unlikely to survive her pregnancy.

Adkins said doctors told her the likely miscarriage could result in mirror syndrome, a rare disorder that would cause her to experience the same life-threatening symptoms as the fetus. Adkins recalled that her medical providers were “visibly distraught” when they told her Idaho law prevented them from performing an abortion. After traveling to Oregon for a legal abortion, Adkins said she and her husband struggled to pay their mortgage.

Now Adkins is suing the state alongside a group of doctors and three Idaho other women who were also denied abortions despite dangerous pregnancy complications. The legal complaint asks a court to clarify the circumstances that are grounds for a legal abortion in Idaho, which bans the procedure in all cases unless it was necessary to prevent the death of a pregnant patient.

“It isn’t safe to be pregnant in Idaho,” Adkins told reporters during a news conference Tuesday. “People in Idaho must be able to make informed decisions with their doctors, without the intrusion from politics. What I needed was an abortion, a safe and standard medical procedure that is often required to save lives and keep families intact.”

 

https://news.yahoo.com/unsafe-pregnant-idaho-women-had-193757496.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZHJ1ZGdlcmVwb3J0LmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAABW3vKj0_i9E0FCJluswcRWPryKGfYusAkjJUZaW9-eoH1zVCe2FiwQagQes5QY2hBtAVGpTWjRzKn-TrL5sZOoyR9-Jodr7sZ77vInZTm-j8gzDagRyohPiw-uGlPksXP0QO79jcPaziAgsWUrmULHtZubmFZXbAmkItgHTIhGn

  • Eyeroll 1
Tommy Callahan All Pro

Tommy Callahan

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Tiberius said:

Earlier this year, Jennifer Adkins learned during a 12-week ultrasound that her second child — nicknamed “Spooky” because she was due near Halloween — was unlikely to survive her pregnancy.

Adkins said doctors told her the likely miscarriage could result in mirror syndrome, a rare disorder that would cause her to experience the same life-threatening symptoms as the fetus. Adkins recalled that her medical providers were “visibly distraught” when they told her Idaho law prevented them from performing an abortion. After traveling to Oregon for a legal abortion, Adkins said she and her husband struggled to pay their mortgage.

Now Adkins is suing the state alongside a group of doctors and three Idaho other women who were also denied abortions despite dangerous pregnancy complications. The legal complaint asks a court to clarify the circumstances that are grounds for a legal abortion in Idaho, which bans the procedure in all cases unless it was necessary to prevent the death of a pregnant patient.

“It isn’t safe to be pregnant in Idaho,” Adkins told reporters during a news conference Tuesday. “People in Idaho must be able to make informed decisions with their doctors, without the intrusion from politics. What I needed was an abortion, a safe and standard medical procedure that is often required to save lives and keep families intact.”https://reproductiverights.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/2022_Annual-Report_Digital-Spreads.pdf

 

https://news.yahoo.com/unsafe-pregnant-idaho-women-had-193757496.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZHJ1ZGdlcmVwb3J0LmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAABW3vKj0_i9E0FCJluswcRWPryKGfYusAkjJUZaW9-eoH1zVCe2FiwQagQes5QY2hBtAVGpTWjRzKn-TrL5sZOoyR9-Jodr7sZ77vInZTm-j8gzDagRyohPiw-uGlPksXP0QO79jcPaziAgsWUrmULHtZubmFZXbAmkItgHTIhGn

you mean the 503C PAC (DEM funded) called center for reproductive, Rights did.

 

Funded by 

 

The Center for Reproductive Rights grossed $31,713,408 in 2016. 23 Much of that funding came from corporate and non-profit donors. The Laura and John Arnold Foundation donated $500,000 or more while George Soros’ Open Society Foundations and the left-leaning grantmaker Libra Foundation donated between $100,000 and $500,000.

 

https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/center-for-reproductive-rights/

 

interesting to see Perkins and Cole on the list of pro bono.

 

The list of funding is interesting to say the least.

 

https://reproductiverights.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/2022_Annual-Report_Digital-Spreads.pdf

 

love to know who those 5 mega unnamed donors were.

 

 

 

 

John from Riverside Hall of Famer

John from Riverside

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, BillStime said:

 

There really is no denying the fact that there is an agenda here and that just the talk of making contraception harder to get furthers that agenda
 

The GOP really doesn’t want this It’s a total loser for them at the ballot box, and the Dems are going to point straight at them.

Edited by John from Riverside
  • Agree 2
Tommy Callahan All Pro

Tommy Callahan

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, John from Riverside said:

There really is no denying the fact that there is an agenda here and that just the talk of making contraception harder to get furthers that agenda
 

The GOP really doesn’t want this It’s a total loser for them at the ballot box, and the Dems are going to point straight at them.

PACS. just like the one suing for the 12-week limit in Tenn.

 

or in Miss that took Row to the supreme court.

 

Just as much if not more money (agenda) to make abortion on demand.  

 

mostly again, from PACS funded by who knows who.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

John from Riverside Hall of Famer

John from Riverside

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, Chris farley said:

PACS. just like the one suing for the 12-week limit in Tenn.

 

or in Miss that took Row to the supreme court.

 

Just as much if not more money (agenda) to make abortion on demand.  

 

mostly again, from PACS funded by who knows who.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I just saw that you understand me I am definitely not for abortion on demand just some thing reasonable
 

I also think there should be a limit on the amount of abortions that you can have I believe that all surgeries are bad even though some are necessary I hate them.

 

There should be some number I don’t know what that number should be where doctors just say OK if you’re not going to have your kids, then it’s time to get your tubes tied

  • Like (+1) 1
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...