Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
21 hours ago, Chris farley said:

TDS, dude lives in your head.  

wasn't the orange dude that pushed the Mississippi law with a 15 week limit to the supreme court.  that was a highly funded PAC.

 

just saying.

 

later

 

 

 

 


Everyone has TDS except the idiots that rush to clean up EVERY mess on aisle 45.

 

if it’s not you, it’s @B-Man, @LeviF and @BillsFanNC.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, BillStime said:


Everyone has TDS except the idiots that rush to clean up EVERY mess on aisle 45.

 

if it’s not you, it’s @B-Man, @LeviF and @BillsFanNC.

 

 

your insults are childish.

 

And would abortion even be a topic without that action by a very shady pac.

 

lots of countries have limits around 15 weeks.

 

 

Posted
19 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

your insults are childish.

 

And would abortion even be a topic without that action by a very shady pac.

 

lots of countries have limits around 15 weeks.

 

 

Ironically, radical Democrats run and hide for cover when you ask them the simple question, "what is a women"?  But they'll fight tooth and nail over abortion issue to protect the rights of this incomprehensibly difficult to define subset of humans.  It's comical.   

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, BillStime said:


Ah yes - the BIG GOTCHA question - freakin idiots.

 

What's A Woman? GOP Senators Stumble On Their Own Question To Ketanji Brown Jackson.

 

Is this your definition of woman?

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A human that has scientifically and medically verifiable female characteristic through the presence of genetic and biological traits that objectively prove the person is a female/women.  Along with working lady-parts. 

 

Your turn.  Do you think a guy wearing a dress and make up with a set of stones taped to his ass is a women?  I'm thinking you do.  And news flash, your part of the cult that believes this fantasy.  If that doesn't make all of you mind-blowing imbeciles I don't know what else to say.  

Edited by All_Pro_Bills
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

A human that has scientifically and medically verifiable female characteristic through the presence of genetic and biological traits that objectively prove the person is a female/women.  Along with working lady-parts. 

 

Your turn.  Do you think a guy wearing a dress and make up with a set of stones taped to his ass is a women?  I'm thinking you do.  And news flash, you’re part of the cult that believes this fantasy.  If that doesn't make all of you mind-blowing imbeciles I don't know what else to say.  


If a man wants to wear a dress - how does that impact your life?

 

Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, BillStime said:


If a man wants to wear a dress - how does that impact your life?

 

You won't even answer my question.  But I'll answer yours. 

 

It doesn't directly impact my life unless the nutjob or some fanatical social justice types that push the idea these lunatics are "women" thinks they're going to force me to believe that insanity.  But if a guy in a dress wants to believe he's a women then okay, its his mental health problem not mine.  "She" just shouldn't expect me to buy into the delusion.  Or for that matter expect any person grounded in reality to believe it either.  The social scene right now is all pretty much the progressive wet dream version of the Emperor's New Clothes tale. 

Edited by All_Pro_Bills
Posted
1 minute ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

It doesn't directly impact my life unless the nutjob or some fanatical social justice types that push the idea these lunatics are "women" thinks they're going to force me to believe that insanity.  But if a guy in a dress wants to believe he's a women then okay, its his mental health problem not mine.  "She" just shouldn't expect me to buy into the delusion.  Or for that matter expect any person grounded in reality to believe it either.   

 

FIFY.

Posted

Just in case anyone hasn't been following the details of the mifepristone case here are some fun facts about it:

  • Forum Shopping: A group of doctors incorporated an organization in Amarillo, Texas. They had no connection to the area, but there is only one district court judge that covers Amarillo and he's been an anti-abortion activist.
  • Lack of standing: The doctors have never performed abortions, nor proscribed mifepristone for abortion purposes. Yet they sued under the legal theory that some day they may be forced to do so somehow, for some reason.
  • Time Travel: One of the reasons the judge used to support his argument is that when the FDA approved mifepristone in 2000, they did not consider the contents of a random blog from 2021.

Yep. This case is totally on the up-and-up, fellas.

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

Just in case anyone hasn't been following the details of the mifepristone case here are some fun facts about it:

  • Forum Shopping: A group of doctors incorporated an organization in Amarillo, Texas. They had no connection to the area, but there is only one district court judge that covers Amarillo and he's been an anti-abortion activist.
  • Lack of standing: The doctors have never performed abortions, nor proscribed mifepristone for abortion purposes. Yet they sued under the legal theory that some day they may be forced to do so somehow, for some reason.
  • Time Travel: One of the reasons the judge used to support his argument is that when the FDA approved mifepristone in 2000, they did not consider the contents of a random blog from 2021.

Yep. This case is totally on the up-and-up, fellas.

seems like its dead in the water.

 

 now the same places one could get transition drugs without a script, are also selling and shipping mifepristone.  like many things, the ban just created a black market.

 

 

Edited by Chris farley
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

Someone who control and own women.  That sound about right?

 

It seems trans are owning lots of women, perhaps you're right. You're a man?

Edited by Pokebball
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Pokebball said:

It seems trans are owning lots of women, perhaps you're right

The comical part of it is they're making a mockery of what it means to be a "real" women and the dummies stand and applaud.  You'd think the radical feminist groups would be rushing in and defending their sisters but not a peep from the cowards. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Pokebball said:

It seems trans are owning lots of women, perhaps you're right. You're a man?

 

I don't think stats are on your side - but you wouldn't want facts to get in the way of your narrative.

 

 

Posted
Just now, BillStime said:

 

I don't think stats are on your side - but you wouldn't want facts to get in the way of your narrative.

 

 

You should talk.  Most of what you post are mis-information spreaders on Twitter.

  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...