Tommy Callahan Posted February 15 Posted February 15 8 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: You do realize the USA exports nearly $200 billion of agricultural commodities every year. I guess we should ban those? You'll be real popular in Iowa. You have seen how small farms are almost non existent to get to that point. They see what's going to happen. And we won't even get into the ties to corporate farming and the weight issue in the west. They don't have that so much where it's still washed seeds in small farms.
B-Man Posted March 10 Posted March 10 It continues: Polish Farmer: “Everything was peaceful and suddenly the police came out of nowhere, there were loud bangs, the police started using gas and simply provoking people…” As Polish farmers struggle with police, Czech farmers drop manure in Prague as part of a new round of protests. by Leslie Eastman Just before I left on my vacation, demonstrations by farmers across Europe had made an impact, as the European Parliament nixed some of its unrealistic green plans for a global utopia. Gone, for example, are rules to force the reduction of nitrogen (essential for fertilizers) and methane (generated by cattle) and plans to persuade European citizens to eat less meat. At least for now. Protests are continuing, and in Poland, there are reports that farmers clashed with police. Police used tear gas and said they detained over a dozen people and prevented the protesters from getting through to the Sejm, the Polish parliament. Farmers are angry over European Union climate policies and food imports from Ukraine that they say threaten their livelihoods. Such protests have occurred across the 27-member EU in recent weeks, but this one was decidedly angrier than earlier demonstrations in the central European nation. Police noted on the social media platform X that its officers “are not a party to the ongoing dispute” and warned that behavior threatening their safety “cannot be taken lightly and requires a firm and decisive response.” The deputy agriculture minister, Michał Kołodziejczak, said he didn’t believe that “real, normal farmers caused a riot in front of the Sejm today,” and that it was necessary to isolate “provocateurs and troublemakers.” However, representatives for the protesting farmers dispute the official accounts. https://legalinsurrection.com/2024/03/polish-farmer-everything-was-peaceful-and-suddenly-the-police-came-out-of-nowhere-there-were-loud-bangs-the-police-started-using-gas-and-simply-provoking-people/
Big Blitz Posted May 16 Author Posted May 16 Yep. At some point - probably when our money is worthless and you can’t feed your family of 2 bc you couldn’t afford kids - and they’re rationing our food it will hit you. “Man, those Trump conspiracy theorists were always right.” You'll want to vote but you can’t. Ekections will be suspended due to civil unrest and wide scale violence over hunger and a worthless currency. 1
Roundybout Posted May 16 Posted May 16 10 hours ago, Big Blitz said: Yep. At some point - probably when our money is worthless and you can’t feed your family of 2 bc you couldn’t afford kids - and they’re rationing our food it will hit you. “Man, those Trump conspiracy theorists were always right.” You'll want to vote but you can’t. Ekections will be suspended due to civil unrest and wide scale violence over hunger and a worthless currency. Theyre reducing emissions from food. They’re not tagging and tracking people buying a steak. Conservatives are scared of their own shadows, it’s absolutely hilarious
ScotSHO Posted May 16 Posted May 16 3 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Theyre reducing emissions from food. They’re not tagging and tracking people buying a steak. Conservatives are scared of their own shadows, it’s absolutely hilarious What are the next steps after gathering this data? I'm curious how this goes.
Roundybout Posted May 16 Posted May 16 2 minutes ago, ScotSHO said: What are the next steps after gathering this data? I'm curious how this goes. You can do a lot. You can see which sectors are best suited for green infrastructure and urban farming, you can find better and more efficient ways to raise meat (seriously, the cattle industry wastes a Herculean amount of water), and you can see which foods can be replaced with healthier options. NYC is doing this at schools and hospitals. It is completely impossible to keep a running track of the average joe who buys steak. That’s nonsense.
Roundybout Posted May 16 Posted May 16 6 minutes ago, BillStime said: It's funny when the cult is concerned about databases... lmao Database for pregnant women: GOOD Database for people who buy meat: BAD Neither is logistically possible of course 1
Big Blitz Posted May 16 Author Posted May 16 Just now, Roundybout said: Database for pregnant women: GOOD Database for people who buy meat: BAD Neither is logistically possible of course What? Who said a database to track pregnant women (or persons if you’re a moron) was a good thing?
Roundybout Posted May 16 Posted May 16 2 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: What? Who said a database to track pregnant women (or persons if you’re a moron) was a good thing? Katie Britt
Big Blitz Posted May 16 Author Posted May 16 4 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Katie Britt She proposed an optional online resource to help pregnant women who aren’t convinced killing their baby is a good idea. We’ve been telling you for years your people wants to limit or ban meat. Here is the mayor of NYC acknowledging that. I think these lunatics govern like this because they know their cities are dead and are never coming back. The smart people are leaving and all that’s left is a government dependent population.
Roundybout Posted May 16 Posted May 16 13 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: She proposed an optional online resource to help pregnant women who aren’t convinced killing their baby is a good idea. We’ve been telling you for years your people wants to limit or ban meat. Here is the mayor of NYC acknowledging that. I think these lunatics govern like this because they know their cities are dead and are never coming back. The smart people are leaving and all that’s left is a government dependent population. He’s looking into ways to lower government emissions such as more plant-based and sustainable food options at public places like hospitals. He’s not banning meat from stores. Come on. Where are the “smart people” going?
Big Blitz Posted May 16 Author Posted May 16 5 minutes ago, Roundybout said: He’s looking into ways to lower government emissions such as more plant-based and sustainable food options at public places like hospitals. He’s not banning meat from stores. Come on. Right right. They can’t shut down the world either. And slowly reopen. And mask. Monday’s announcement increased that commitment to 33 percent. “It is easy to talk about emissions that are coming from vehicles and how it impacts our carbon footprint, it is easy to talk about the emissions that’s coming from buildings and how it impacts our environment,” Mr. Adams said, standing next to a chef in a toque at a city hospital kitchen. “But we now have to talk about beef. And I don’t know if people are really ready for this conversation.” The announcement is the latest development in Mr. Adams’s longstanding interest in vegetarianism, but it also represents an unusually frank admission from a national political leader that Americans will have to eat differently if they want to rein in climate change. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/17/nyregion/eric-adams-meat-emissions-nyc.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare 5 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Where are the “smart people” going? Free states. Free localities. 1
The Frankish Reich Posted May 25 Posted May 25 3 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: Doesn’t sound like freedom A truly free state would be more focused on banning lab-grown meat. 1
Recommended Posts