Jump to content

Seven Subpoenaed in Fulton County Grand Jury Investigation Investigating Trump's Attempts to Overturn the 2020 Election


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, ChiGoose said:

If Dem lawyers decided to commit crimes, they should be prosecuted too. I absolutely want the judicial system to indict people who commit crimes.

But they won't be.  As an example, the Clinton campaign funded and manufactured the Russian collusion hoax, fed the false story to the FBI, which then used it as pretext to acquire warrants to snoop on a Presidential campaign.  False statements, documents, payments laundered, and conspiracy.  They all walked.  

 

AG Garland names the Asst AG as special prosecutor for the Hunter Biden "investigation", the same guy that's been stonewalling the investigation for years, made a secret blanket immunity deal, and shut down investigators from other Federal agencies such as the IRS.  Special powers to delay it more and hide it better providing assistance to the administration in power.  The cops at the FBI are going to arrest themselves and the lawyers at DOJ are going to put themselves on trial?  Not a chance.  

 

 

Edited by All_Pro_Bills
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
46 minutes ago, TSOL said:

It's an abomination. It's their airing of our countries dirty laundry for the world to see.

 

It's a petty grievance and it's an embarrassment that my fellow Americans would support such a pathetic display 

 

I'm ashamed of you Dems for supporting such a grotesque miscarriage of justice 


Trump did that and more starting on Tuesday, November 24, 2015:

 giphy.gif?cid=2154d3d7f34662251128d2cc8b
 

You are an embarrassment for supporting this POS and endorsing this pathetic display.

 

Shame on you 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, BillStime said:


Trump did that and more starting on Tuesday, November 24, 2015:

 giphy.gif?cid=2154d3d7f34662251128d2cc8b
 

You are an embarrassment for supporting this POS and endorsing this pathetic display.

 

Shame on you 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I support less government involvement and in our day to day lives.

 

Yes, this is true 

 

And I feel no shame about that 

Edited by TSOL
Posted
48 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:


So we should just let former presidents commit serious crimes? Try to overturn elections? Defraud the country? 
 

Other democracies prosecute politicians who commit crimes. 
 

Do you think politicians should be immune to prosecution for crimes?

You’re a total clown. The lesson of the last election is that our system worked. The checks and balances put in place resolved the issue. Trump is not president and he didn’t need to be forcefully removed from office by anyone. The End. 

  • Vomit 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

But they won't be.  As an example, the Clinton campaign funded and manufactured the Russian collusion hoax, fed the false story to the FBI, which then used it as pretext to acquire warrants to snoop on a Presidential campaign.  False statements, documents, payments laundered, and conspiracy.  They all walked.  

 

But you see the FBI fixed all of those things internally. None of those things can happen again. The FBI said so. No need to punish anyone who broke the law here, things are fine going forward.

 

And #chigoose, the King, is more than willing to swallow that load and keep repeating it.

 

24 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

 

AG Garland names the Asst AG as special prosecutor for the Hunter Biden "investigation", the same guy that's been stonewalling the investigation for years, made a secret blanket immunity deal, and shut down investigators from other Federal agencies such as the IRS.  Special powers to delay it more and hide it better providing assistance to the administration in power.  The cops at the FBI are going to arrest themselves and the lawyers at DOJ are going to put themselves on trial?  Not a chance.  

 

 

 

#Chigoose is just waiting for evidence, any evidence!

 

:lol:

Posted
Just now, TSOL said:

 

 

I support less government involvement and n our day to day lives.

 

Yes, this is true 


Then why do you support Conald who increased the size of federal government, increased our debt, and couldn’t keep out of court going after muslins and LGTBQ?

 

Look at what red states are doing ~ actual communists - going after women, blacks, LGTBQ and history - these actions couldn’t be more intrusive in every day life.

 

You cry about dirty laundry and embarrassment but you support this traitor who prioritizes Putin over America, Americans, and our own intelligence agencies.

 

Look at this disgrace:

 

image.thumb.jpeg.1fdbe85a7d335fa55860c0d21ab88b52.jpeg

 

Look at America’s dirtiest laundry that the you and the cult spend every day cleaning up after - an endless job.

Posted
Just now, BillsFanNC said:

 

But you see the FBI fixed all of those things internally. None of those things can happen again. The FBI said so. No need to punish anyone who broke the law here, things are fine going forward.

 

And #chigoose, the King, is more than willing to swallow that load and keep repeating it.

 

 

#Chigoose is just waiting for evidence, any evidence!

 

:lol:

These people are amazing. If this went to an actual court the judge would say… “wait, what, you mean the winner of the contract/bid is bringing a claim against the loser?”. And then…”Get the Fock out of my courtroom! We don’t have time for this.”

  • Eyeroll 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, BillStime said:


Then why do you support Conald who increased the size of federal government, increased our debt, and couldn’t keep out of court going after muslins and LGTBQ?

 

Look at what red states are doing ~ actual communists - going after women, blacks, LGTBQ and history - these actions couldn’t be more intrusive in every day life.

 

You cry about dirty laundry and embarrassment but you support this traitor who prioritizes Putin over America, Americans, and our own intelligence agencies.

 

Look at this disgrace:

 

image.thumb.jpeg.1fdbe85a7d335fa55860c0d21ab88b52.jpeg

 

Look at America’s dirtiest laundry that the you and the cult spend every day cleaning up after - an endless job.

 

 

I just don't view it that way. I'm not against Muslims and LGTBQ I just don't want offensive material in mine or my kids direct view. 

 

Trump 100% never prioritized Putin over America that's crazy. 

 

I just like conservative idealism as opposed to the rampant progressive "change just for the sake of change" agenda. 

 

I never meant to hurt you .. I never meant to make you cry.... 

Edited by TSOL
Oops
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

But they won't be.  As an example, the Clinton campaign funded and manufactured the Russian collusion hoax, fed the false story to the FBI, which then used it as pretext to acquire warrants to snoop on a Presidential campaign.  False statements, documents, payments laundered, and conspiracy.  They all walked.  

 

AG Garland names the Asst AG as special prosecutor for the Hunter Biden "investigation", the same guy that's been stonewalling the investigation for years, made a secret blanket immunity deal, and shut down investigators from other Federal agencies such as the IRS.  Special powers to delay it more and hide it better providing assistance to the administration in power.  The cops at the FBI are going to arrest themselves and the lawyers at DOJ are going to put themselves on trial?  Not a chance.  

 

 

 

This is a gross misstatement of the facts. Where in the world are you getting your information?

 

But in any case, did Hillary Clinton conspire to have people act as fraudulent electors to change the election outcome in any state? Did she pressure state officials to change the voting tallies? Was she told time and time again that she lost but despite this, act to overturn the outcome of the election?

 

This isn't even in the same ballpark as the Steele Dossier. Why are you all so obsessed with it? 

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Dislike 1
Posted
Just now, ChiGoose said:

 

This is a gross misstatement of the facts. Where in the world are you getting your information?

 

But in any case, did Hillary Clinton conspire to have people act as fraudulent electors to change the election outcome in any state? Did she pressure state officials to change the voting tallies? Was she told time and time again that she lost but despite this, act to overturn the outcome of the election?

 

This isn't even in the same ballpark as the Steele Dossier. Why are you all so obsessed with it? 

 

You are completely delusional.

  • Agree 1
Posted

In my long career I have personally reviewed and presided over literally hundreds of multi million dollar public bids. (Maybe thousands.) In each case those competing for the contract spend many months and many thousands of dollars trying to win the contract. If the results of the sealed bids are anywhere near close, the second place and sometimes even the third place bidders question literally everything about the low bidder’s paperwork. There’s almost always a “bid protest” submitted to the awarding agency, board, council and their attorneys…including the protesting entity making public statements in open forum at the night of the award. The board or council listen to the protest, ask staff and council if the protest has merit, and in 999 out of 1,000 they choose to move forward with the intended award. Nobody is indicted for the protest; no matter how ridiculous the claim may be seen to be. Everyone moves on and the unsuccessful bidder is NEVER disqualified from bidding the next time. You cannot tell me that in the Trump case it isn’t political, because it is! 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

In my long career I have personally reviewed and presided over literally hundreds of multi million dollar public bids. (Maybe thousands.) In each case those competing for the contract spend many months and many thousands of dollars trying to win the contract. If the results of the sealed bids are anywhere near close, the second place and sometimes even the third place bidders question literally everything about the low bidder’s paperwork. There’s almost always a “bid protest” submitted to the awarding agency, board, council and their attorneys…including the protesting entity making public statements in open forum at the night of the award. The board or council listen to the protest, ask staff and council if the protest has merit, and in 999 out of 1,000 they choose to move forward with the intended award. Nobody is indicted for the protest; no matter how ridiculous the claim may be seen to be. Everyone moves on and the unsuccessful bidder is NEVER disqualified from bidding the next time. You cannot tell me that in the Trump case it isn’t political, because it is! 


None of this is relevant to this case. 
 

He is not being indicted for complaining. He is being indicted for fraud. 

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:


None of this is relevant to this case. 
 

He is not being indicted for complaining. He is being indicted for fraud. 

It’s ALL relevant. In virtually every bid protest there is some allegation of fraud on somebody’s part. You’re clueless! 

Posted
5 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

It’s ALL relevant. In virtually every bid protest there is some allegation of fraud on somebody’s part. You’re clueless! 


This isn’t a bid. It isn’t a contract. It isn’t an allegation of fraud in a bidding. 
 

This is a conspiracy to commit fraud after the fact. 
 

Maybe talk to someone who actually knows anything about this before calling someone else clueless because you’re completely off base here. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, ChiGoose said:


This isn’t a bid. It isn’t a contract. It isn’t an allegation of fraud in a bidding. 
 

This is a conspiracy to commit fraud after the fact. 
 

Maybe talk to someone who actually knows anything about this before calling someone else clueless because you’re completely off base here. 

Ha! I’ve listened to every opinion there can be Goose and whether you want to hear it or not there’s tons of disagreement to go around. That’s why we don’t just agree with the government in a free, non-fascist society. And…. I didn’t say it was a bid. I was OBVIOUSLY making an analogy to a similar publicly governed competition. Fraud, my arse! 

Posted
50 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Ha! I’ve listened to every opinion there can be Goose and whether you want to hear it or not there’s tons of disagreement to go around. That’s why we don’t just agree with the government in a free, non-fascist society. And…. I didn’t say it was a bid. I was OBVIOUSLY making an analogy to a similar publicly governed competition. Fraud, my arse! 


I guess your arse is fraud then. 
 

Not sure what else you would call having people sign documents falsely claiming to be officials in order to subvert an election. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:


I guess your arse is fraud then. 
 

Not sure what else you would call having people sign documents falsely claiming to be officials in order to subvert an election. 

We’re going to find out Goose. By now you should’ve learned not to believe everything being reported. As an attorney I thought that’d be a freshman year course….no? 

Posted
11 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

We’re going to find out Goose. By now you should’ve learned not to believe everything being reported. As an attorney I thought that’d be a freshman year course….no? 


Maybe you should try reading primary sources and, in areas that aren’t in your wheelhouse, listening to experts. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...