Irv Posted August 20, 2022 Posted August 20, 2022 Please stop with this endless bull#### and lying. Just one disinformation scheme after another. What a mess.
Doc Posted August 20, 2022 Posted August 20, 2022 1 hour ago, Irv said: Please stop with this endless bull#### and lying. Just one disinformation scheme after another. What a mess. What else have they got? Have you seen Joke's approval ratings? 2
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted August 20, 2022 Posted August 20, 2022 1 hour ago, Irv said: Please stop with this endless bull#### and lying. Just one disinformation scheme after another. What a mess. The grand jury process offers excellent cover for this sort of thing. It’s typically one-sided, there is very little upside for targets of investigations to appear, and the grand jury simply decides if the matter can proceed. Big picture, the argument can be made that it’s in the public interest to take the next step. The hope is that all parties are acting ethically without animus to trust that the right thing is done, which sadly is a heavy list.
716er Posted August 20, 2022 Author Posted August 20, 2022 9 minutes ago, Doc said: What else have they got? Have you seen Joke's approval ratings? Go outside
Irv Posted August 20, 2022 Posted August 20, 2022 7 minutes ago, Doc said: What else have they got? Have you seen Joke's approval ratings? Sad but true. I’m sick of the misery this administration has been putting us through with their idiotic social experiments. Time for the amateurs to leave the room and let actual leaders take over again. What a mess. 2
Tommy Callahan Posted September 15, 2022 Posted September 15, 2022 12 minutes ago, BillStime said: LOL. where to start. the shady PAC that shared it. the shady site that posted it. and is referencing hearsay that like 3 layers removed. Heard all that from the same places so many times. let me know if this one is actually something. 1
Tiberius Posted September 15, 2022 Posted September 15, 2022 10 minutes ago, Chris farley said: LOL. where to start. the shady PAC that shared it. the shady site that posted it. and is referencing hearsay that like 3 layers removed. Heard all that from the same places so many times. let me know if this one is actually something. The long arm of the law is catching up to that criminal 1
Doc Posted September 15, 2022 Posted September 15, 2022 1 hour ago, Chris farley said: LOL. where to start. the shady PAC that shared it. the shady site that posted it. and is referencing hearsay that like 3 layers removed. Heard all that from the same places so many times. let me know if this one is actually something. They got them now part 59... 1 1
Tommy Callahan Posted September 16, 2022 Posted September 16, 2022 17 hours ago, Tiberius said: The long arm of the law is catching up to that criminal let me know when it actuall happens. you all been saying that non stop for years Whats the new high crime he is accused of. its hard to keep up.
Tiberius Posted September 16, 2022 Posted September 16, 2022 44 minutes ago, Chris farley said: let me know when it actuall happens. you all been saying that non stop for years Whats the new high crime he is accused of. its hard to keep up. I know, he is not just a pathological liar, but a serial criminal. Stealing government documents is the latest crime. I'll let you know when they indict, but it seems he wants to rile up a mob if that happens so buckle your chin strap!
Tommy Callahan Posted September 20, 2022 Posted September 20, 2022 On 9/16/2022 at 8:47 AM, Tiberius said: I know, he is not just a pathological liar, but a serial criminal. Stealing government documents is the latest crime. I'll let you know when they indict, but it seems he wants to rile up a mob if that happens so buckle your chin strap! Welp. you got him this time. Never mind the countless other times you all said the same thing, and then just moved on to the next thing when it fizzled
Tiberius Posted September 20, 2022 Posted September 20, 2022 1 hour ago, Chris farley said: Welp. you got him this time. Never mind the countless other times you all said the same thing, and then just moved on to the next thing when it fizzled Past performance is not indicative of future returns 👍
Tommy Callahan Posted September 20, 2022 Posted September 20, 2022 32 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Past performance is not indicative of future returns 👍 but shows the evidence that they are non stop, political and based on conspiracies vs actual facts. are we even on J6 still?
Tiberius Posted November 14, 2022 Posted November 14, 2022 https://www.brookings.edu/research/second-edition-fulton-county-georgias-trump-investigation/ The report sums up the damning facts in the case: [Trump] and those around him, including his chief of staff and others, made multiple attempts to intervene and overturn the state’s election results. His personal attorneys testified falsely in the state legislature. His campaign pursued a plan to organize false electors that included a bogus slate in Georgia. Trump attempted to replace his own attorney general to seek the unlawful intervention of the Georgia legislature. . . . Most notably, on Saturday, January 2, 2021, Trump placed a call to Georgia’s Republican Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. Trump urged and ultimately threatened Raffensperger to reverse the election outcome — including a demand that Raffensperger “find 11,780 votes” that could be deemed fraudulent and tossed out. That number was exactly one more vote than the margin of Joe Biden’s 11,779-vote victory in the state. If Raffensperger’s office complied with his request, Trump would be named the winner of the state’s presidential election, and presumably could use that development to seek a broader unraveling of the certified election results in other states confirming his defeat Trump’s call to Raffensperger is by no means the only action he took demonstrating his intentions. Indeed, the evidence presented in the Brookings report should remove any reasonable doubt the former president was out to steal the election. This includes: Trump’s repeated attempts to discredit the results, even before the election began and despite multiple investigations that found no evidence of fraud. Calls that Trump made, not only to Georgia officials, but to election officials in multiple states to devise slates of phony electors. Trump’s desperate ploy to have the Justice Department send out letters to states falsely indicating there was evidence of fraud. Trump’s attempt to fire then-acting attorney general Jeffrey Rosen when he refused to send out such letters. Trump’s enlistment of lawyers, including John Eastman and Cleta Mitchell, to work out a scheme to negate Georgia’s valid, certified electoral slates of electors. Trump’s decision to send his lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, to falsely testify at a Georgia hearing about already-refuted conspiracy theories. The Brookings report also notes that “Trump’s team continued to pressure Georgia legislators throughout the month of December, with Giuliani meeting again with the Georgia State Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Dec. 30, 2020.” Trump’s attempt to enlist Republican National Committee Chair Ronna McDaniel to help his efforts in Georgia. Trump’s refusal to heed pleas from Georgia officials that his bogus allegations were putting election workers and state officials at risk of violence.
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted November 14, 2022 Posted November 14, 2022 26 minutes ago, Tiberius said: https://www.brookings.edu/research/second-edition-fulton-county-georgias-trump-investigation/ The report sums up the damning facts in the case: [Trump] and those around him, including his chief of staff and others, made multiple attempts to intervene and overturn the state’s election results. His personal attorneys testified falsely in the state legislature. His campaign pursued a plan to organize false electors that included a bogus slate in Georgia. Trump attempted to replace his own attorney general to seek the unlawful intervention of the Georgia legislature. . . . Most notably, on Saturday, January 2, 2021, Trump placed a call to Georgia’s Republican Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. Trump urged and ultimately threatened Raffensperger to reverse the election outcome — including a demand that Raffensperger “find 11,780 votes” that could be deemed fraudulent and tossed out. That number was exactly one more vote than the margin of Joe Biden’s 11,779-vote victory in the state. If Raffensperger’s office complied with his request, Trump would be named the winner of the state’s presidential election, and presumably could use that development to seek a broader unraveling of the certified election results in other states confirming his defeat Trump’s call to Raffensperger is by no means the only action he took demonstrating his intentions. Indeed, the evidence presented in the Brookings report should remove any reasonable doubt the former president was out to steal the election. This includes: Trump’s repeated attempts to discredit the results, even before the election began and despite multiple investigations that found no evidence of fraud. Calls that Trump made, not only to Georgia officials, but to election officials in multiple states to devise slates of phony electors. Trump’s desperate ploy to have the Justice Department send out letters to states falsely indicating there was evidence of fraud. Trump’s attempt to fire then-acting attorney general Jeffrey Rosen when he refused to send out such letters. Trump’s enlistment of lawyers, including John Eastman and Cleta Mitchell, to work out a scheme to negate Georgia’s valid, certified electoral slates of electors. Trump’s decision to send his lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, to falsely testify at a Georgia hearing about already-refuted conspiracy theories. The Brookings report also notes that “Trump’s team continued to pressure Georgia legislators throughout the month of December, with Giuliani meeting again with the Georgia State Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Dec. 30, 2020.” Trump’s attempt to enlist Republican National Committee Chair Ronna McDaniel to help his efforts in Georgia. Trump’s refusal to heed pleas from Georgia officials that his bogus allegations were putting election workers and state officials at risk of violence. wait what?? Trump called somebody and asked them to do something stupid and illegal but worded it in such a way that he can wiggle out of it? and they didn’t do it? And he still would have lost the election? this is late breaking news we’ve all known for two years that the idiots in washington can’t seem to use to bring anything to closure. 1
Tiberius Posted November 14, 2022 Posted November 14, 2022 5 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said: wait what?? Trump called somebody and asked them to do something stupid and illegal but worded it in such a way that he can wiggle out of it? and they didn’t do it? And he still would have lost the election? this is late breaking news we’ve all known for two years that the idiots in washington can’t seem to use to bring anything to closure. It's not Washington, it's Georgia And I sure hope you are Trump's defense attorney!
Recommended Posts