BillsFanNC Posted August 30, 2023 Posted August 30, 2023 12 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: Maybe you should try reading primary sources and, in areas that aren’t in your wheelhouse, listening to experts. Listening to "experts" Good one. 1
BillStime Posted August 30, 2023 Posted August 30, 2023 9 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: Listening to "experts" Good one. And your experts?
TSOL Posted August 30, 2023 Posted August 30, 2023 10 minutes ago, BillStime said: And your experts? I'm an expert, you don't f'ckin listen to me 1
BillsFanNC Posted August 30, 2023 Posted August 30, 2023 Let me give Billsfu.kc a hint... When you hear "experts say..." "many experts tell us" " according to experts...." Accompanied by ZERO mention of who exactly those "experts" are, where they made such claims, and data to support the claims.... THEN YOU ARE BEING LIED TO. "experts say that despite the sky appearing to be blue, it's actually green." Question from sane people: What experts? Where is their data to back up the claim? Answer from useful idiots: Shut up. Experts say so. 1
SoCal Deek Posted August 30, 2023 Posted August 30, 2023 13 hours ago, ChiGoose said: Maybe you should try reading primary sources and, in areas that aren’t in your wheelhouse, listening to experts. Goose, I think you'll find that I'm willing to listen...please describe the 'fraud' you claim to have been perpetrated 2
T&C Posted September 8, 2023 Posted September 8, 2023 https://baynews9.com/fl/tampa/news/2023/09/08/can-1960-hawaii-election-get-ga--false-electors-off-the-hook- 1
All_Pro_Bills Posted September 8, 2023 Posted September 8, 2023 (edited) 3 hours ago, T&C said: https://baynews9.com/fl/tampa/news/2023/09/08/can-1960-hawaii-election-get-ga--false-electors-off-the-hook- In the brief, Willis summarily dismissed the comparison between the action of the Georgia defendants and “actions that did not result in prosecution 60 years ago in a different jurisdiction with different election code and criminal statutes, presided over by different prosecuting agencies, and with differing substantive evidence of criminal intent.” And most important and obvious but left unsaid.. that she's out to get Trump. Please excuse me if we're still playing that "rule of law" game of peek-a-boo. Edited September 8, 2023 by All_Pro_Bills 1
Tommy Callahan Posted September 8, 2023 Posted September 8, 2023 (edited) https://twitter.com/itoldyaso88/status/1628430599819067394 this clip seems to be as valid as ever. http://<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Emily khors is the forewoman of the Trump grand jury and she’s an absolute lunatic. She must think she’s the lead role in her head. <a href="https://t.co/67DDzPmN83">pic.twitter.com/67DDzPmN83</a></p>— Stephan (@itoldyaso88) <a href="https://twitter.com/itoldyaso88/status/1628430599819067394?ref_src=twsrc^tfw">February 22, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> wonder why they she isnt on those commentary sites any more. Edited September 8, 2023 by Chris farley
B-Man Posted September 10, 2023 Posted September 10, 2023 The ‘Why Not?’ grand jury: The Georgia final report should worry us all The Hill, by Jonathan Turley With the release of the special grand jury final report in Georgia, the nation finally was able to see what foreperson Emily Kohrs last February was giggling about in interviews. Call it the “Why not?” report. Back then, when Kohrs was asked if there were recommended charges, she chuckled and said, “Can you imagine doing this for eight months and not coming out with a whole list of recommended indictments? It’s not a short list. It’s not.'” In addition to nodding at an expected Trump indictment, she added, “There may be some names on that list that you wouldn’t expect.” After all, why not? https://thehill.com/opinion/criminal-justice/4194898-the-why-not-grand-jury-the-georgia-final-report-should-worry-us-all/ 1
B-Man Posted October 19, 2023 Posted October 19, 2023 LOL at the minnows here taking the bait. 10 minutes ago, BillStime said: 1 minute ago, TH3 said: The case is crumbling, but you lemmings can keep on celebrating. Quote She pleaded guilty on Thursday morning to six misdemeanor counts of conspiracy to commit intentional interference of election duties. Ms. Powell, who appeared in a downtown Atlanta courtroom, was sentenced to six years of probation for the charges, a significantly less-severe outcome than she would have faced if found guilty of the charges for which she was originally indicted, which included a violation of the state racketeering law 1
BillStime Posted October 19, 2023 Posted October 19, 2023 2 minutes ago, B-Man said: The case is crumbling, but you lemmings can keep on celebrating. If the case is crumbling; why bother plead guilty? 3
TH3 Posted October 20, 2023 Posted October 20, 2023 10 hours ago, B-Man said: LOL at the minnows here taking the bait. The case is crumbling, but you lemmings can keep on celebrating. Texas Lindsay is your source of insight? Pretty much sums you up
B-Man Posted October 20, 2023 Posted October 20, 2023 12 minutes ago, TH3 said: Texas Lindsay is your source of insight? Pretty much sums you up Another one with the same old mistake The information is right there, it was just posted by Texas Lindsey. The Fulton County prosecutor office and MSNBC. Pretty much sums up your mistake.
Warcodered Posted October 20, 2023 Posted October 20, 2023 (edited) 10 hours ago, B-Man said: LOL at the minnows here taking the bait. The case is crumbling, but you lemmings can keep on celebrating. Then why did she make a deal at all if she was so assured to beat those charges? I mean seriously what's your theory that she decided that instead of going through a trial that you think she'd apparently clearly win, she decided to make a deal for lesser charges while having to speak truthfully about her involvement in the criminal conspiracy and be prepared to testify. As well as the years of probation, the fine, and likely future loss of her law license. You think that's what that means? Or maybe and I'm just spit balling, but she was right before her trial was going to start, went "Oh *****! I'm about to go to prison." and made a deal to avoid it. I mean what do you think a plea deal is? Edited October 20, 2023 by Warcodered
Recommended Posts