Liz’s political calculus - next prez

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

Ugh, enough with the legacy politicians.  
 

Cheney will be incredibly popular with the Dems until she’s no longer necessary, at which point a story will break that she had farm-style relations with some old guy who’s kids she babysat when she was 15.  
 

Then again maybe she can be part of the über-unifying Liz/Hunter ticket with Chelsea Clinton as Sec State, Jenna Bush as press secretary with Sasha and Malika as jr Senators from Massachusetts.  
 

 

 

 

[Doc]

3 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

Not just daddy… big oil in general would absolutely bankroll her campaign. 
 

her entire foreign policy life, and it’s extensive has been about propping up the petrodollar.

 

Could you imagine a ticket with her and Desantis? They might win 60% of the vote against Biden. 

 

It’s true her political positions are all text book R, and I think all the real republicans out there would absolutely love her once this jan6 summer movie show is out of the way.  

 

Big oil won't bankroll her campaign because she's toxic and will only play to the never-Trumpers.  She's also a one-and-done term Senator who won't be in Congress for almost 2 years when the general election rolls around.  Why choose her over, say, DeSantis, who also wants big oil?

 

And there's no way DeSantis would choose her as VP.  While the other way around won't happen for the reasons mentioned above.

[Tiberius]

1 hour ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

That’s cute

I'm glad she is stepping up to investigate the attack on our government. Looks like you could care less. 

 

Do you wish Trump had succeed in stopping the peaceful transfer of power? 

[Over 29 years of fanhood]

3 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

I'm glad she is stepping up to investigate the attack on our government. Looks like you could care less. 

 

Do you wish Trump had succeed in stopping the peaceful transfer of power? 

I don’t wish anything about trump other than we stopped hearing about the dooosche that was purged almost 2 years ago. 
 

I really could care less a bunch of idiots had a stupid riot egged on by a stupid guy and got arrested for strolling through the capital. They didn’t even burn anything!!???
 

This “investigation” produced by a news executive is a sham. Nothing will come of it. What are they going to impeach donnie again??? This is all political theatre so they can hopefully run against the ghost of bad man past, since they can’t run on results. 

 

And btw, it’s cute innocent naivety that you think Cheney is just acting out of her heart and not political calculus. 

[Tiberius]

8 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

I don’t wish anything about trump other than we stopped hearing about the dooosche that was purged almost 2 years ago. 
 

I really could care less a bunch of idiots had a stupid riot egged on by a stupid guy and got arrested for strolling through the capital. They didn’t even burn anything!!???
 

This “investigation” produced by a news executive is a sham. Nothing will come of it. What are they going to impeach donnie again??? This is all political theatre so they can hopefully run against the ghost of bad man past, since they can’t run on results. 

 

And btw, it’s cute innocent naivety that you think Cheney is just acting out of her heart and not political calculus. 

Chill out man. If you don't care, then stop acting like you care so much. Chill out!! 

[Warcodered]

19 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

I don’t wish anything about trump other than we stopped hearing about the dooosche that was purged almost 2 years ago. 
 

I really could care less a bunch of idiots had a stupid riot egged on by a stupid guy and got arrested for strolling through the capital. They didn’t even burn anything!!???
 

This “investigation” produced by a news executive is a sham. Nothing will come of it. What are they going to impeach donnie again??? This is all political theatre so they can hopefully run against the ghost of bad man past, since they can’t run on results. 

 

And btw, it’s cute innocent naivety that you think Cheney is just acting out of her heart and not political calculus. 

I'd be more inclined to agree with this if there weren't so many people in/running for office that continue to parrot lies about the election, that is seriously dangerous.

[BillStime]

5 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Under Oath?

 

Oh, no?  Why not?

 

 

 

[Over 29 years of fanhood]

7 minutes ago, Warcodered said:

I'd be more inclined to agree with this if there weren't so many people in/running for office that continue to parrot lies about the election, that is seriously dangerous.

That’s true, and also in typical ‘merica fashion a new bar or “protest arrogance” we can call it has been set. 
 

But that’s hardly new, everyone has been lying about elections since at least the hanging Chad.

[Warcodered]

7 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

That’s true, and also in typical ‘merica fashion a new bar or “protest arrogance” we can call it has been set. 
 

But that’s hardly new, everyone has been lying about elections since at least the hanging Chad.

Gore conceded and he had a much stronger case than Trump ever did.

[Over 29 years of fanhood]

25 minutes ago, Warcodered said:

Gore conceded and he had a much stronger case than Trump ever did.

tah may toe

 

toe muh toe

[Warcodered]

4 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

tah may toe

 

toe muh toe

So are you saying a case where the election was really close and they ended up going through legal proceedings because it was so close, and the candidate that came out on the losing side of those proceedings concedes is the same as a case where it wasn't all that close there was a clear victor that also won the legal procedures that followed and the losing candidate not only doesn't concede but claims victory and continues to claim victory today?

[ChiGoose]

4 minutes ago, Warcodered said:

So are you saying a case where the election was really close and they ended up going through legal proceedings because it was so close, and the candidate that came out on the losing side of those proceedings concedes is the same as a case where it wasn't all that close there was a clear victor that also won the legal procedures that followed and the losing candidate not only doesn't concede but claims victory and continues to claim victory today?

 

GTFO with actual logic. You know it has no place here on PPP.

Edited June 29, 2022 by ChiGoose

[Tiberius]

Angry she chose country over the party. Wow. 

 

Those who follow political parties blindly are a big part of the problem today. 

[Over 29 years of fanhood]

24 minutes ago, Warcodered said:

So are you saying a case where the election was really close and they ended up going through legal proceedings because it was so close, and the candidate that came out on the losing side of those proceedings concedes is the same as a case where it wasn't all that close there was a clear victor that also won the legal procedures that followed and the losing candidate not only doesn't concede but claims victory and continues to claim victory today?

Just about every Every presidential   election outcome has been undermined since by the loser in one way or other. It’s been a slippery slope for sure. 
 

Wait until the dems lose WH next and they burn down DC and claim elon musk manipulated twitbookagram. It’s a vicious escalating cycle. 

Edited June 29, 2022 by Over 29 years of fanhood

[Warcodered]

1 minute ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

Just about every Every presidential   election outcome has been undermined since by the loser in one way or other. It’s been a slippery slope for sure. 
 

Wait until the dems lose WH next and they burn down DC. It’s a vicious escalating cycle. 

Some examples please?

[Over 29 years of fanhood]

Just now, Warcodered said:

Some examples please?

Go read the conspiracies/controversies  section in Wikipedia under every presidential election since.  It’s all there.

 

It s shows a perpetual acrimonious decline of the political stooges respecting election outcomes. It’s undeniable. 

16 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Angry she chose country over the party. Wow. 

 

Those who follow political parties blindly are a big part of the problem today. 

Yes you are!

[Tiberius]

6 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

Go read the conspiracies/controversies  section in Wikipedia under every presidential election since.  It’s all there.

 

It s shows a perpetual acrimonious decline of the political stooges respecting election outcomes. It’s undeniable. 

Yes you are!

You are complaining that she isn't following the party line, not me. 

 

You want her to kiss Trump's butt and you are angry she isn't. 

 

 

[Warcodered]

13 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

Go read the conspiracies/controversies  section in Wikipedia under every presidential election since.  It’s all there.

 

It s shows a perpetual acrimonious decline of the political stooges respecting election outcomes. It’s undeniable. 

Yes you are!

So, upon reviewing those elections the closest I could find was this one in 2016 where one of the candidates claimed that if they lost the election was rigged, but then they won, and their opponent still conceded.

Edited June 29, 2022 by Warcodered

[Over 29 years of fanhood]

3 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

You are complaining that she isn't following the party line, not me. 

 

You want her to kiss Trump's butt and you are angry she isn't. 

 

 

I’m not complaining at all.  I am commending her risk calculation and strategy. 

 

just laughing at the thought you live in a world where politicians do anything without ulterior motivation.
 

It’s a charming little trait. 

4 minutes ago, Warcodered said:

So, upon reviewing those elections the closest I could find was this one in 2016 where one of the candidates claimed that if they lost the election was rigged, but then they won, and their opponent still conceded.

Not questioning the last was the worst. Just saying it’s been a developing pattern. 
 

it’s really disappointing. 

[reddogblitz]

15 hours ago, Andy1 said:

She is a true conservative who values truth above party.

 

And where did she get this truthfulness trait? Her father?