Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 6/24/2022 at 8:20 PM, Gene Frenkle said:

When will they bring back slavery?

Expand  

Statements like this, while meant for dramatic effect are just a joke or display ignorance of the Constitution and the role played by the Supreme Court in our Republic and its three branches of government.  But the question is simply preposterous.  The court can't bring back slavery because there is a Constitutional amendment that prohibits and abolishes slavery.  The 13th Amendment. If abortion proponents want Constitutional protection, then introduce an amendment in Congress, pass the amendment, and send it to the States for consideration and ratification.  That's how our democracy works.  You know.  The one I see so many posts saying they revere and cherish.  As long as they get their way I guess.  So follow the rules and deal with it.  If you can't pass the Amendment in Congress and get enough States to ratify the Amendment, then that's just democracy in action.  

 

 

  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
  On 6/25/2022 at 11:42 PM, All_Pro_Bills said:

Statements like this, while meant for dramatic effect are just a joke or display ignorance of the Constitution and the role played by the Supreme Court in our Republic and its three branches of government.  But the question is simply preposterous.  The court can't bring back slavery because there is a Constitutional amendment that prohibits and abolishes slavery.  The 13th Amendment. If abortion proponents want Constitutional protection, then introduce an amendment in Congress, pass the amendment, and send it to the States for consideration and ratification.  That's how our democracy works.  You know.  The one I see so many posts saying they revere and cherish.  As long as they get their way I guess.  So follow the rules and deal with it.  If you can't pass the Amendment in Congress and get enough States to ratify the Amendment, then that's just democracy in action.  

 

 

Expand  

 

Irony is dead.......

 

af.thumb.JPG.68cdf6aa8e6275d8897957a85cb07b92.JPGsdf.thumb.JPG.402c9abe192de31083e74bf903da8681.JPGimage.thumb.jpeg.b1a826db1836357459ef12fa8db5f30b.jpegimage.thumb.jpeg.5de94f44d858004ec416f82e6df0e15b.jpegimage.thumb.jpeg.9536ba4eedaf7feac19fd39e9915b859.jpeg

Posted
  On 6/25/2022 at 2:19 PM, LeviF said:


“This is about the future of our children” is hilariously mealy-mouthed for someone who thinks children should be able to be cut up alive and sucked out of the womb on any whim of the “mother.”


Bought? Let’s say he isn’t arguing in good faith, which I’m not conceding. What makes you think he’s bought vs. out for revenge for the constant hit pieces and threats against his wife? 

Expand  

 

Because it's clear he has a list to complete. I'm wondering how far back he intends to turn the clock. When was rape legal?

  On 6/25/2022 at 11:42 PM, All_Pro_Bills said:

Statements like this, while meant for dramatic effect are just a joke or display ignorance of the Constitution and the role played by the Supreme Court in our Republic and its three branches of government.  But the question is simply preposterous.  The court can't bring back slavery because there is a Constitutional amendment that prohibits and abolishes slavery.  The 13th Amendment. If abortion proponents want Constitutional protection, then introduce an amendment in Congress, pass the amendment, and send it to the States for consideration and ratification.  That's how our democracy works.  You know.  The one I see so many posts saying they revere and cherish.  As long as they get their way I guess.  So follow the rules and deal with it.  If you can't pass the Amendment in Congress and get enough States to ratify the Amendment, then that's just democracy in action.  

 

 

Expand  

 

Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions.

Posted
  On 6/26/2022 at 12:40 AM, Gene Frenkle said:

 

Because it's clear he has a list to complete. I'm wondering how far back he intends to turn the clock. When was rape legal?

 

Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions.

Expand  

“I’m just acting ######ed to make fun of you!”

Posted
  On 6/27/2022 at 3:06 PM, Big Blitz said:

Omg!!!!!!   Noooooooooooooooo!!!

 

 

 

 

 

 

3 Justices continue to show what absolute trash they are.   

Expand  

 

At least those three justices understood what the facts of the case were instead of just making them up to get to their desired outcome...

  • Dislike 1
Posted
  On 6/27/2022 at 3:14 PM, Tiberius said:

They probably will. Murder incorporated, i.e. the Pro-Life court is all about misery and chaos 

 

If the country is in chaos it's easier to create a dictatorship 

Expand  


Anarchy is better than the weaponized incompetence currently oppressing America’s once-great cities. Imposing onerous laws only on the lawful, letting the underbelly get away with murder. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
  On 6/27/2022 at 3:18 PM, LeviF said:


Anarchy is better than the weaponized incompetence currently oppressing America’s once-great cities. Imposing onerous laws only on the lawful, letting the underbelly get away with murder. 

Expand  

Not to peace loving people, i.e., the majority of the country. We will get violent when we have to, and God have mercy on you when that happens

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
  On 6/25/2022 at 12:54 PM, Tiberius said:

Focus d-bag. Constitution. Hitler made trains run on time argument is not an argument for constitutional government. 

 

 

Expand  

I believe that was Mussolini, not Hitler.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
  On 6/27/2022 at 3:26 PM, Tiberius said:

Not to peace loving people, i.e., the majority of the country. We will get violent when we have to, and God have mercy on you when that happens

Expand  


Loving peace isn’t a virtue when you aren’t capable of war. 

Posted
  On 6/27/2022 at 3:41 PM, Big Blitz said:

 

 

 

Like Sebelius.  Just the facts.  

Expand  

 

  • Kennedy was not fire, he resigned
  • The District had no objection to him returning to the field after everyone had left to pray
  • Some students felt compelled to join in the prayers to stay connected to the team or ensure playing time

This isn't a case about someone trying to pray in private, it's about someone who only would pray in public when there would be plenty of people to watch and potentially join in. 

 

This guy is basically the definition of the people Jesus called out in Matthew 6:5-6:

  Quote

“And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by others. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full. But when you pray, go into your room, close the door and pray to your Father, who is unseen. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you."

Expand  

 

×
×
  • Create New...