SoCal Deek Posted June 17, 2022 Posted June 17, 2022 Just now, Tiberius said: But you could care less why he held a rally there at that time. Everyone knows why he had a rally. Are you the only one in the world that doesn’t?
Tiberius Posted June 17, 2022 Author Posted June 17, 2022 1 minute ago, SoCal Deek said: Everyone knows why he had a rally. Are you the only one in the world that doesn’t? . 1
All_Pro_Bills Posted June 17, 2022 Posted June 17, 2022 4 minutes ago, Tiberius said: You watched the hearings? I don't have a lot of free time anymore since I'm busy working and taking on a second job because of inflation and deteriorating economic conditions. 1 1
Tiberius Posted June 17, 2022 Author Posted June 17, 2022 1 minute ago, All_Pro_Bills said: I don't have a lot of free time anymore since I'm busy working and taking on a second job because of inflation and deteriorating economic conditions. So you are spouting ignorance to help a criminal
SoCal Deek Posted June 17, 2022 Posted June 17, 2022 9 minutes ago, Tiberius said: So you are spouting ignorance to help a criminal So I’m curious Tibs. It’s clear that you lean heavily Left. And it’s also pretty clear that the window for Trump to be charged for these so called crimes is closing in about 150 days. If he’s not charged…what does that say about what’s going on here?
Tiberius Posted June 17, 2022 Author Posted June 17, 2022 1 minute ago, SoCal Deek said: So I’m curious Tibs. It’s clear that you lean heavily Left. And it’s also pretty clear that the window for Trump to be charged for these so called crimes is closing in about 150 days. If he’s not charged…what does that say about what’s going on here? So you think only liberals care about the rule of law? Interesting. You do support a literal criminal. You guys REALLY hate our government!
Irv Posted June 17, 2022 Posted June 17, 2022 All smoke and mirrors to distract from Demented Joke Biden’s abject disaster he and his dopey buddies created. Destroying this country. What a mess. 2 1
Doc Posted June 17, 2022 Posted June 17, 2022 The majority of America doesn't care about J6 in so far as the "insurrection" claim goes because a) they have far more important things to worry about than a protest that turned violent and a one-off event a the Capitol that won't be repeated again and b) the Dems did the same thing over Trump's 4 years, and even beyond. He won't be arrested and he won't be convicted. There's actually a far better chance he's the next President of the US. So get your new fake scandals and ways to steal/overturn/delegitimize the election ready... 2
ChiGoose Posted June 17, 2022 Posted June 17, 2022 3 minutes ago, Doc said: The majority of America doesn't care about J6 in so far as the "insurrection" claim goes because a) they have far more important things to worry about than a protest that turned violent and a one-off event a the Capitol that won't be repeated again and b) the Dems did the same thing over Trump's 4 years, and even beyond. He won't be arrested and he won't be convicted. There's actually a far better chance he's the next President of the US. So get your new fake scandals and ways to steal/overturn/delegitimize the election ready... I would dispute that this was necessarily a one-time thing. All of the stolen election theories have been thoroughly debunked at this point, and yet across the country there are candidates running on the basis of the election being stolen. These people either: are too ignorant to realize that what they are saying is not true, or they know it's a lie but are pushing it for personal and political gain. So what happens if one of them is a governor or secretary of state in a battleground state in 2024? We already have one instance of someone not certifying a vote this election cycle based on a debunked conspiracy: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/gop-commission-refuses-to-certify-new-mexico-primary-results-over-distrust-of-voting-machines
SoCal Deek Posted June 17, 2022 Posted June 17, 2022 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: So you think only liberals care about the rule of law? Interesting. You do support a literal criminal. You guys REALLY hate our government! It was a simple question Tibs. I’ve generally enjoyed discussions with you. So let me ask it again, if the clock is rapidly running out on the Democrats grip on this committee, and believe me they know that, then what’s going on here? 1
Tiberius Posted June 17, 2022 Author Posted June 17, 2022 2 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: It was a simple question Tibs. I’ve generally enjoyed discussions with you. So let me ask it again, if the clock is rapidly running out on the Democrats grip on this committee, and believe me they know that, then what’s going on here? What do you think?
SoCal Deek Posted June 17, 2022 Posted June 17, 2022 Just now, Tiberius said: What do you think? Well since you’re clearly afraid to answer….I will. I believe Nancy miscalculated and got this thing rolling when she thought everything would be humming right along in the country with Uncle Joe at the helm. The plan was to milk this all the way until late 2023 when candidates were starting to position themselves for the next presidential primary season. With the country now a total mess, and viewership for the hearings a predictable flop, they’re simply stuck. 2 1
Tiberius Posted June 17, 2022 Author Posted June 17, 2022 1 minute ago, SoCal Deek said: Well since you’re clearly afraid to answer….I will. I believe Nancy miscalculated and got this thing rolling when she thought everything would be humming right along in the country with Uncle Joe at the helm. The plan was to milk this all the way until late 2023 when candidates were starting to position themselves for the next presidential primary season. With the country now a total mess, and viewership for the hearings a predictable flop, they’re simply stuck. Oh no!
LeGOATski Posted June 17, 2022 Posted June 17, 2022 52 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: I would dispute that this was necessarily a one-time thing. All of the stolen election theories have been thoroughly debunked at this point, and yet across the country there are candidates running on the basis of the election being stolen. These people either: are too ignorant to realize that what they are saying is not true, or they know it's a lie but are pushing it for personal and political gain. So what happens if one of them is a governor or secretary of state in a battleground state in 2024? We already have one instance of someone not certifying a vote this election cycle based on a debunked conspiracy: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/gop-commission-refuses-to-certify-new-mexico-primary-results-over-distrust-of-voting-machines That's frustrating. No specific reason to not certify the results, just "I know in my heart that it's not right."
SoCal Deek Posted June 17, 2022 Posted June 17, 2022 36 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Oh no! That’s an odd response.
ChiGoose Posted June 17, 2022 Posted June 17, 2022 59 minutes ago, LeGOATski said: That's frustrating. No specific reason to not certify the results, just "I know in my heart that it's not right." We are going to be seeing more of that. If Mastriano wins in PA, I would doubt it would be possible for a Dem presidential candidate to win there in 2024. Mastriano will just claim fraud and throw out the electors.
Doc Posted June 18, 2022 Posted June 18, 2022 11 hours ago, ChiGoose said: I would dispute that this was necessarily a one-time thing. All of the stolen election theories have been thoroughly debunked at this point, and yet across the country there are candidates running on the basis of the election being stolen. These people either: are too ignorant to realize that what they are saying is not true, or they know it's a lie but are pushing it for personal and political gain. So what happens if one of them is a governor or secretary of state in a battleground state in 2024? We already have one instance of someone not certifying a vote this election cycle based on a debunked conspiracy: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/gop-commission-refuses-to-certify-new-mexico-primary-results-over-distrust-of-voting-machines Specifically, the Capitol will not be broken-into again (unless allowed to by Schiff ). They will from here on out take any threat seriously, especially now that the "defund the police" stupidity has passed.
Tiberius Posted June 20, 2022 Author Posted June 20, 2022 On 6/17/2022 at 9:28 PM, Doc said: Specifically, the Capitol will not be broken-into again (unless allowed to by Schiff ). They will from here on out take any threat seriously, especially now that the "defund the police" stupidity has passed. Do you think the court house of a Trump trial would be attacked? Or there will be threats/attacks on judges and jurors in a Trump trial? What do you think would be the response of Trump nation is he is indicted and put on trial?
SoCal Deek Posted June 20, 2022 Posted June 20, 2022 9 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Do you think the court house of a Trump trial would be attacked? Or there will be threats/attacks on judges and jurors in a Trump trial? What do you think would be the response of Trump nation is he is indicted and put on trial? My two cents: I think you over estimate the allegiance to Trump; the person. The vast vast majority of his supporters like what he stood for…which was shining a light on Washington’s political class, and returning the focus to the American working class. 2
Recommended Posts