Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

And his excuse to the committee as to why he was urging people on the 5th and morning of the 6th was because he thought the Capitol would be open.  He also told them that breaking the law isn't in his DNA.

 

Then he ends up being among the first people to breech the outer perimeter at the Capitol. A barricade with police standing behind it is typically indicative that whatever is behind it is closed, but ole Ray didn't stop the group and say you know what, it turns out that the Capitol is closed today, my bad, we can't go in.  But he moved beyond the barricade anyway, because you know breaking the law isn't in his DNA or anything.

 

All they had to do is charge him like the others or not charge the others who did far less than him. But they didn't and are choosing to die on this ridiculously inconsistent and suspicious hlll.

 

He told them "he thought the Capitol would be open"...and yet is on video telling people "we gotta break into the Capitol"?  And those idiots bought that?  Yeah, not suspicious at all.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
12 hours ago, Doc said:

 

He told them "he thought the Capitol would be open"...and yet is on video telling people "we gotta break into the Capitol"?  And those idiots bought that?  Yeah, not suspicious at all.

Maybe the answer is on THAT laptop! 

Posted
16 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Perhaps! 

 

I hear there is a message from Satan himself on that laptop 

 

Probably.  That's who they dance with...

Posted

Why no conspiracy charge?

 

Because Epps is the sole solitary MAGA insurrectionist that the left/FBI/DOJ/committee/media choose to defend.

 

Just leave the poor guy alone!

 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

This clip only scratches the surface.  His testimony is a massive set of contradictions and inconsistencies that the committee and leftists just nod along to. 

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, BillsFanNC said:

This clip only scratches the surface.  His testimony is a massive set of contradictions and inconsistencies that the committee and leftists just nod along to. 

 

 

 

Of course they do.  Epps is more responsible for the break-in of the Capitol than Trump.  But that's not who they are/were after.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

Of course they do.  Epps is more responsible for the break-in of the Capitol than Trump.  But that's not who they are/were after.

and therefore Trump IS responsible.  ya know, I think Hilary was wrong.  Les miserables would have ben much more apt than deplorables.

Posted
2 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

and therefore Trump IS responsible.  ya know, I think Hilary was wrong.  Les miserables would have ben much more apt than deplorables.

 

No he's not.  Otherwise charges would have been filed, especially now since he's a private citizen.  But keep up the fantasy.

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

Yes, Epps is.  Because he was actually there telling people to break-into the Capitol and helping it happen. 

More responsible logically implies some responsibility, non?  Rehl was too. Why not target him?

Edited by redtail hawk
Posted
12 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

Perhaps a better question is "Who is Zach Rehl?

https://www.inquirer.com/news/philadelphia/proud-boys-trial-zach-rehl-enrique-tarrio-sedition-philadelphia-20230109.html

you just said "more responsible than Trump"

 

You know who would be a great resource to tell us more about Zach Rehl?

 

Any or all of the eight FBI informants who infiltrated the Proud Boys in the months leading up to J6.

 

Also in two photos in the article you linked to you can see the orange neon hat Proud Boys. None have been arrested. Perhaps they could tell us more as well?

  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

More responsible logically implies some responsibility, non?  Rehl was too. Why not target him?

 

Yes and I gave reasons why he's more responsible than Trump.  As for Rehl, he was arrested, non?

  • Eyeroll 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Doc said:

 

Yes and I gave reasons why he's more responsible than Trump.  As for Rehl, he was arrested, non?

So Trump is responsible.  logic's not your thing.  Yes, Rehl's trial started today but I don't see many MAGA's attacking or blaming him.

Edited by redtail hawk
Posted
1 hour ago, redtail hawk said:

So Trump is responsible.  logic's not your thing.  Yes, Rehl's trial started today but I don't see many MAGA's attacking or blaming him.

 

Um, no he's not.  He never said anything close to "we gotta enter the Capitol" and even told people to be peaceful and patriotic.  Until/unless you can find him saying that, he's not responsible and there will never be charges brought against him for it.  If that's your example of "logic," yes it's not my thing.

 

And I've said all along that anyone who committed crimes that day were stupid and should get what's coming to them.  To call it an "insurrection" is laughable but emblematic of the loony left.

Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

Um, no he's not.  He never said anything close to "we gotta enter the Capitol" and even told people to be peaceful and patriotic.  Until/unless you can find him saying that, he's not responsible and there will never be charges brought against him for it.  If that's your example of "logic," yes it's not my thing.

 

And I've said all along that anyone who committed crimes that day were stupid and should get what's coming to them.  To call it an "insurrection" is laughable but emblematic of the loony left.

ok, i'll diagram your logic:

Premise:  Ray Epps is responsible for Jan 6

Premise:  Epps is MORE responsible than trump for Jan 6

Conclusion:Trump is also responsible

 

Epps can not be more responsible if trump is not responsible at all.

Conversely, trump most be somewhat responsible if he's less responsible than Epps

The word "more" in this context logically implies "some" from Trump

 

It's  kinda like grade school mathematics but a lot more fun.  Hope that helps.

Edited by redtail hawk
×
×
  • Create New...