Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey look here @ChiGoose answers to many of your previous questions from the organization that analyzed the data. No need to go to WaPo or Bulwark.

 

https://www.truethevote.org/ttv-2000mules-faqs/

 

Questions about geospatial data:

 

Geospatial data can be purchased from a variety of places, curated for a variety of purposes. A great resource to learn about geospatial data can be found here https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/12/19/opinion/location-tracking-cell-phone.html

 

What about the Fact-Checkers?

 

We think you will find this article interesting: https://www.truethevote.org/true-the-vote-and-2000-mules-fact-check-the-fact-checkers/

 

Has True the Vote told law enforcement, the FBI, elected officials?

 

We did involve federal and state officials and law enforcement and are working with those who wish to act. Unfortunately, some are not willing to work with us which is why we are encouraging all Americans to take action in their state to ensure free and fair elections.

 

Why doesn’t 2000 Mules show the same person going to multiple drop boxes as claimed?

 

We do have video showing the same person at multiple drop boxes. Some of that footage was shown in the first trailer. It was taken out because the video is extremely poor quality.

We address this issue in the film. Most jurisdictions had no video or if they did, it was (illegally) destroyed. Of what does exist, 85% of it is bad; the camera poorly positioned, out of focus, the video compiled out of chronological sequence, inexplicably missing blocks of days and times. 

This is why the geospatial evidence is the key. 

One thing this exercise proved to us is that drop box surveillance video was never monitored, as voters expected it would be. Like so many other election processes, it was a false promise of security. 

We will soon be releasing all of the raw video footage so America can see for itself. Hold the line patriots: we always keep our promises. 

 

What happens next? #Ripcord

 

We are now preparing the next phase of our project: pulling the #Ripcord!

Since 2020, we’ve collected a tremendous amount of data and video, along with thousands of pages of documents from open records requests. Our plan is to release it all publicly for crowdsourced review and research. We’ve only analyzed the tip of the iceberg, and there’s far more that will be revealed with the public’s help.

We will post all video and data as soon as possible. Everything must be reformatted, compressed, and organized for easier access. This is a priority for us, but it will take time. We appreciate your patience while we prepare and we share your excitement for what comes next!

If research isn’t your thing, that’s a-ok. This is just step one. There’s a lot more work to be done.

Please stay tuned. We’ll communicate via email. More information will follow.

https://rumble.com/v13zwyp-true-the-vote-this-is-not-the-end.html

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, DRsGhost said:

Hey look here @ChiGoose answers to many of your previous questions from the organization that analyzed the data. No need to go to WaPo or Bulwark.

 

https://www.truethevote.org/ttv-2000mules-faqs/

 

Questions about geospatial data:

 

Geospatial data can be purchased from a variety of places, curated for a variety of purposes. A great resource to learn about geospatial data can be found here https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/12/19/opinion/location-tracking-cell-phone.html

 

What about the Fact-Checkers?

 

We think you will find this article interesting: https://www.truethevote.org/true-the-vote-and-2000-mules-fact-check-the-fact-checkers/

 

Has True the Vote told law enforcement, the FBI, elected officials?

 

We did involve federal and state officials and law enforcement and are working with those who wish to act. Unfortunately, some are not willing to work with us which is why we are encouraging all Americans to take action in their state to ensure free and fair elections.

 

Why doesn’t 2000 Mules show the same person going to multiple drop boxes as claimed?

 

We do have video showing the same person at multiple drop boxes. Some of that footage was shown in the first trailer. It was taken out because the video is extremely poor quality.

We address this issue in the film. Most jurisdictions had no video or if they did, it was (illegally) destroyed. Of what does exist, 85% of it is bad; the camera poorly positioned, out of focus, the video compiled out of chronological sequence, inexplicably missing blocks of days and times. 

This is why the geospatial evidence is the key. 

One thing this exercise proved to us is that drop box surveillance video was never monitored, as voters expected it would be. Like so many other election processes, it was a false promise of security. 

We will soon be releasing all of the raw video footage so America can see for itself. Hold the line patriots: we always keep our promises. 

 

What happens next? #Ripcord

 

We are now preparing the next phase of our project: pulling the #Ripcord!

Since 2020, we’ve collected a tremendous amount of data and video, along with thousands of pages of documents from open records requests. Our plan is to release it all publicly for crowdsourced review and research. We’ve only analyzed the tip of the iceberg, and there’s far more that will be revealed with the public’s help.

We will post all video and data as soon as possible. Everything must be reformatted, compressed, and organized for easier access. This is a priority for us, but it will take time. We appreciate your patience while we prepare and we share your excitement for what comes next!

If research isn’t your thing, that’s a-ok. This is just step one. There’s a lot more work to be done.

Please stay tuned. We’ll communicate via email. More information will follow.

https://rumble.com/v13zwyp-true-the-vote-this-is-not-the-end.html

 

Who runs Amistad Project's True the Vote?

Posted

 

 

True.

 

 

Wireless Services CEO Destroys Ignorant Attacks by Fake Fact-Checkers on “2000 Mules” — The Fact-Checkers
“Don’t Have the Technical Foundation for the Comments They’re Making”

by Jim Hoft

 

With the release of 2,000 Mules, patriots around the country are seeing the truth about the obvious voter fraud that was caught on video at designated ballot boxes. The Mules are those who were dropping fraudulent ballots into drop boxes. We know about the ones that were recorded and who were sloppy enough to keep their phones with them as they committed systemic voter fraud.There is much more voter fraud evidence from the 2020 election emerging.

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/05/exclusive-wireless-services-ceo-destroys-weak-attacks-fake-fact-checkers-2000-mules-fact-checkers-dont-technical-foundation-comments-making/

 

 

 

Posted

Hey, they were just walking by drop boxes 20 times.  After visiting Democrat offices.  Totally coincidental.

Posted

Minimum criteria to be considered a mule by True the vote organization data set summarized in 2000 mules.

 

10 or more STOPS at drop boxes. The signal has to stop there, not just move past it, as people just moving past a drop box could legitimately be on their way to someplace else during their normal daily routine.

 

AND

 

5 or more visits to known Democrat non profits between the drop box stops.

 

BOTH of the above criteria need to be true in order to be included in the data set.

 

I challenge anyone to find even one "fact check" that describes the above criteria in a way that's even remotely close to accurate. 

 

Keep in mind they claim that there are some mules in Philly going to 50 plus drop boxes and some of those cross the bridge into NJ to go to Democrat non-profits and then come back to Philly area drop boxes.

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted

 

You can repeat "most secure election in US history" and "the big lie" all you want, but the reality is that when the majority of voters feel like there's cheating to an extent that it affects outcomes then that ls a major problem for the republic.

  • Shocked 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
49 minutes ago, DRsGhost said:

 

You can repeat "most secure election in US history" and "the big lie" all you want, but the reality is that when the majority of voters feel like there's cheating to an extent that it affects outcomes then that ls a major problem for the republic.


Trump lost.

 

 

 

Posted
3 hours ago, DRsGhost said:

 

You can repeat "most secure election in US history" and "the big lie" all you want, but the reality is that when the majority of voters feel like there's cheating to an extent that it affects outcomes then that ls a major problem for the republic.

 

 

 

Wow, more than a third of Democrats !

 

looks like there are some democrats with sense.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
On 5/25/2022 at 4:47 PM, BillStime said:

 

Who runs Amistad Project's True the Vote?


@DRsGhost - is there a reason why you don’t want to answer this question?

 

What else is the Amistad Project - aka True the Vote - aka 2000 Mules - aka Catherine Engelbrecht - up to?

 

 


F’n fascist - destroying our country 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
6 hours ago, BillStime said:


@DRsGhost - is there a reason why you don’t want to answer this question?

 

What else is the Amistad Project - aka True the Vote - aka 2000 Mules - aka Catherine Engelbrecht - up to?

 

 


F’n fascist - destroying our country 

Yup, they will try and disrupt Democratic precincts and then declare victory. Evil, just pure evil 

Posted
27 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Yup, they will try and disrupt Democratic precincts and then declare victory. Evil, just pure evil 

Why are you worried if there are challenges at voting time?  Surely you know the history of such challenges.  We’re a year and a half past the Biden election, there have been no criminal charges filed against the Trump campaign.  The 1/6 committee is languishing and another poster shared today that a substantial percentage of Dems have concerns about election security.  
 

If there is no wrongdoing or funny business, there is nothing to be concerned about.  

  • Agree 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Why are you worried if there are challenges at voting time?  Surely you know the history of such challenges.  We’re a year and a half past the Biden election, there have been no criminal charges filed against the Trump campaign.  The 1/6 committee is languishing and another poster shared today that a substantial percentage of Dems have concerns about election security.  
 

If there is no wrongdoing or funny business, there is nothing to be concerned about.  

Did you read the article? 

Posted
4 hours ago, Tiberius said:

Did you read the article? 

Yes.  It’ describes a grassroots campaign designed to work within the framework of election laws to ensure a fair election.  Volunteers are suddenly a bad thing?  Working at a granular level is a problem? Folks engaged in the political process is a bad thing?   Are we not Barracking a vote anymore? 
 

What are you worried about that’s specifically outlined here?  2020 was the safest election ever—everyone knows this.  Why would 2022 suddenly be an issue? 

Posted
1 hour ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Yes.  It’ describes a grassroots campaign designed to work within the framework of election laws to ensure a fair election.  Volunteers are suddenly a bad thing?  Working at a granular level is a problem? Folks engaged in the political process is a bad thing?   Are we not Barracking a vote anymore? 
 

What are you worried about that’s specifically outlined here?  2020 was the safest election ever—everyone knows this.  Why would 2022 suddenly be an issue? 


I love when these idiots play dumb 

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted
On 5/27/2022 at 2:42 PM, DRsGhost said:

Minimum criteria to be considered a mule by True the vote organization data set summarized in 2000 mules.

 

10 or more STOPS at drop boxes. The signal has to stop there, not just move past it, as people just moving past a drop box could legitimately be on their way to someplace else during their normal daily routine.

 

AND

 

5 or more visits to known Democrat non profits between the drop box stops.

 

BOTH of the above criteria need to be true in order to be included in the data set.

 

I challenge anyone to find even one "fact check" that describes the above criteria in a way that's even remotely close to accurate. 

 

Keep in mind they claim that there are some mules in Philly going to 50 plus drop boxes and some of those cross the bridge into NJ to go to Democrat non-profits and then come back to Philly area drop boxes.

 

 

 

 

 


🎯

 

 

Posted
On 5/22/2022 at 10:22 PM, DRsGhost said:

“… down ballot …. with Rs gaining 13 seats in the house…”


This fact alone is proof positive whatever fraud did or didn’t happen was immaterial. Biden won handily running as a moderate and many tried to balance the ticket down ballet 

Posted
47 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:


This fact alone is proof positive whatever fraud did or didn’t happen was immaterial. Biden won handily running as a moderate and many tried to balance the ticket down ballet 

Yep... I didn't vote for Trump or Biden, but mostly voted Republican down ballet. A lot of Republicans said "F that" after seeing 4 years of Trump. You could see it in the polls. I myself didn't vote for him in 2016, either. I would never want that type of person leading the free world and representing the US. First time I ever didn't vote republican.

×
×
  • Create New...