Augie Posted April 25, 2022 Posted April 25, 2022 1 minute ago, The Wiz said: Your services will be missed. Ugh, that’s embarrassing! But the internet is forever. I’ve learned my lesson! Quote
JohnNord Posted April 25, 2022 Posted April 25, 2022 3 hours ago, 78thealltimegreat said: Going to miss the man who in 2019 pro football focus famously said was better then Josh Allen. May he have many future Steelers-Bills duels on Madden. That should never be lived down. He made this statement 14 weeks into Allen’s second year too. It was ridiculous then and looks worse now Quote
BarleyNY Posted April 25, 2022 Posted April 25, 2022 56 minutes ago, Buffalo716 said: The link is blocked behind a paywall? And saying duck is better, then putting a caveat that it's only been three games is BS That's why they have no merit .. you either stand by your convictions or you don't It's not TMZ, they try to put themselves out as legitimate football people.. you can't just write joke articles I did not realize it is behind a paywall. (I subscribe.) Honestly, it’s not their fault if people looking for an excuse to be outraged cherry pick one sentence that fits their agenda. Quote
Buffalo716 Posted April 25, 2022 Posted April 25, 2022 (edited) 5 minutes ago, BarleyNY said: I did not realize it is behind a paywall. (I subscribe.) Honestly, it’s not their fault if people looking for an excuse to be outraged cherry pick one sentence that fits their agenda. Pff has notoriously had it out for Allen since draft day Almost starting the article with that sentence makes anything after irrelevant Cuz that is clickbait at its best And PFF has been known for clickbait articles How do we get views? Let's start the article with duck Hodges is better than Josh Allen Edited April 25, 2022 by Buffalo716 1 Quote
Old Man Posted April 25, 2022 Posted April 25, 2022 I was at the game in 2019 here in Pittsburgh, I couldn't understand why he kept throwing at Tre White, after game was just great Quote
BarleyNY Posted April 25, 2022 Posted April 25, 2022 43 minutes ago, Buffalo716 said: Pff has notoriously had it out for Allen since draft day Almost starting the article with that sentence makes anything after irrelevant Cuz that is clickbait at its best And PFF has been known for clickbait articles How do we get views? Let's start the article with duck Hodges is better than Josh Allen That’s ridiculous. The people at PFF absolutely expected Allen to fail in the NFL. That’s what the historical data pointed to as a near certainty. But Allen has succeeded. And guess what? The people at PFF have not only acknowledged that, they’ve changed their methodology to try to account for players like him. But don’t let any of that temper your outrage. Quote
Buffalo716 Posted April 25, 2022 Posted April 25, 2022 (edited) 34 minutes ago, BarleyNY said: That’s ridiculous. The people at PFF absolutely expected Allen to fail in the NFL. That’s what the historical data pointed to as a near certainty. But Allen has succeeded. And guess what? The people at PFF have not only acknowledged that, they’ve changed their methodology to try to account for players like him. But don’t let any of that temper your outrage. I mean I could care less about PFF.. and they do have nice advanced statistics Somebody mentioned them saying duck Hodges was better And to everybody who cannot subscribe to PFF.. the only sentence you have is duck Hodges is better than Josh Allen That's a fact There is no historical data for quarterbacking because things like completion percentage don't measure accuracy.. it doesn't account for team talent... Or scheme... pass attempts...You look for traits Tons of football scouts had Josh Allen as a tremendous talent.. that's why he was coveted.. talked about as a potential number one pick While most analytic sites don't like him because analytic people aren't football coaches or scouts Sometimes you need to be able to use your eye and say hey that's a good football player.. not just use numbers or data PFF is nice with all the advanced Data it gives you but they're not the best talent evaluators Edited April 25, 2022 by Buffalo716 1 1 Quote
Heavy Kevi Posted April 26, 2022 Posted April 26, 2022 Well I guess now I'll have to change my avatar 1 Quote
Hapless Bills Fan Posted April 26, 2022 Posted April 26, 2022 6 hours ago, Buffalo716 said: The link is blocked behind a paywall? And saying duck is better, then putting a caveat that it's only been three games is BS That's why they have no merit .. you either stand by your convictions or you don't It's not TMZ, they try to put themselves out as legitimate football people.. you can't just write joke articles Sam Monson admitted on Twitter that nobody at PFF really believed that Duck Hodges was better. The strong implication is it was just something they said to "stir the *****" and rile up Bills mafia Quote
Buffalo716 Posted April 26, 2022 Posted April 26, 2022 2 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said: Sam Monson admitted on Twitter that nobody at PFF really believed that Duck Hodges was better. The strong implication is it was just something they said to "stir the *****" and rile up Bills mafia I think that was part of my point of why i don't take them too seriously That's something that pundits do or journalists do not scouts I could do without clickbait, now all the advanced stats are good Quote
K-9 Posted April 26, 2022 Posted April 26, 2022 37 minutes ago, Buffalo716 said: I think that was part of my point of why i don't take them too seriously That's something that pundits do or journalists do not scouts I could do without clickbait, now all the advanced stats are good Not sure how anyone can find PFF credible after admitting they undermine their reporting integrity by deliberately trolling fans with takes they admit are untrue. It’s always been amateur hour at PFF and Monson proves it. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.