Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Tanning nude > tanning covered. I’m not sure there’s even a debate to be had here. 

Posted

Tucker is the poster child for the rights masculinity.   I don't know if I can think of anyone that exemplifies manliness more than him.  Too bad he ditched the bowtie.   Tan yo nuts g.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
7 hours ago, LeviF said:

Tanning nude > tanning covered. I’m not sure there’s even a debate to be had here. 


Not a tanner but don’t most folks in it for the bronze look tan their whole bodies and not just their ballsack?

Posted
4 minutes ago, 716er said:


Not a tanner but don’t most folks in it for the bronze look tan their whole bodies and not just their ballsack?

 

I'm in it for the vitamin D.

 

Exposure to sunlight in general can help boost testosterone production in men. Since testosterone is produced in the genitals, bro science would figure that genitals exposed to sunlight would help boost production even more. But who knows whether that is actually the case. The brain ultimately controls production so maybe not.

  • 5 months later...
Posted

Tucker is a weirdo. He’s a wanna be tough guy who is a actually a wimp who craves attention and has never had to struggle in his life. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

I’ve never seen him as a tough guy at all. He’s a guy (and of course we all know it’s just a TV show) that likes to ask questions, take a different angle, and push back on the standard government narrative. His approach applies to everything from politics to UFOs. There was a time in a galaxy seemingly far far away when journalists did just that. Not any more. 

  • Agree 2
Posted
31 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

I’ve never seen him as a tough guy at all. He’s a guy (and of course we all know it’s just a TV show) that likes to ask questions, take a different angle, and push back on the standard government narrative. His approach applies to everything from politics to UFOs. There was a time in a galaxy seemingly far far away when journalists did just that. Not any more. 


Man crush, eh?

 

Jim will be upset.

 

 

 

 

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, BillStime said:


Man crush, eh?

 

Jim will be upset.

 

 

 

 

 

Nope. Just a simple, unemotional comment based on what I’ve seen; not an agenda I’m trying to push, or a smear campaign I’m desperate to promote. Nothing more, nothing less. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Nope. Just a simple, unemotional comment based on what I’ve seen; not an agenda I’m trying to push, or a smear campaign I’m desperate to promote. Nothing more, nothing less. 

 

Millionaires for billionaires... of which you are neither.

 

image.thumb.jpeg.ce672ab1801eeb51e552cd29e3305d5c.jpeg

 

 

 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, BillStime said:

 

Millionaires for billionaires... of which you are neither.

 

image.thumb.jpeg.ce672ab1801eeb51e552cd29e3305d5c.jpeg

 

 

 

 

Don’t be so quick to assume there dude or dudet. Of the two us, I’m guessing I’m the only one who’ll be sitting on Malibu Beach later today. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Don’t be so quick to assume there dude or dudet. Of the two us, I’m guessing I’m the only one who’ll be sitting on Malibu Beach later today. 

 

Awe, that's so cute...

 

I stand by my comment. Millionaires for billionaires... of which you are neither.

 

 

 

 

Posted
11 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

Awe, that's so cute...

 

I stand by my comment. Millionaires for billionaires... of which you are neither.

 

 

 

 

What’s cute about it? I don’t pretend to know whether you’re a man or a woman. No disrespect intended whatsoever. Care to let me know? It’ll make things simpler.
 

And ….your assumption is still incorrect. 

  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...