Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 hours ago, Precision said:

I could see a scenario of something like a combination of increasing the maximum Social Security taxable wages faster than inflation and an inflation adjusted reduction in non-discretionary spending.  Over time this could at least balance the budget.  The solution will no doubt have higher earners almost exclusively paying more with minor spending cuts.  I think the debt hangs around forever and becomes a smaller number (and issue) compared to GDP over time. 

 

I don't think most Americans care or are smart enough to understand the repercussions of a default.  I do think there is a "class" of Americans that understand how truly terrible a default or austerity measures could be economically and regarding civil unrest.  Hopefully these people can influence the executive and legislative branches into at least running a balanced budget for a few years. 

Unfortunately, most of the debate about the debt is centered on pointing fingers at which party is more irresponsible than the other along with who is threatening to take away people's "benefits". 

 

It's like two guys arguing over how to split the dinner check on the deck of the Titanic while the ship is sinking.  

  • Like (+1) 3
  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...
Posted
On 10/19/2023 at 2:59 AM, Tommy Callahan said:

Lefty fear mongering 

I really don’t understand how you can say that whenever it’s literally coming out of their mouths

 

It’s one of the few things that I give Donald Trump credit for at least for now he’s not for messing with old peoples money

Posted
12 hours ago, John from Riverside said:

I really don’t understand how you can say that whenever it’s literally coming out of their mouths

 

It’s one of the few things that I give Donald Trump credit for at least for now he’s not for messing with old peoples money

Cause the game has been played out a million times.  

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, BillStime said:

 

The embedded tweet actually softballs it. He didn't just "imply" that he thinks cutting Social Security and Medicare is necessary. He flat-out said it. By the way, this seems to have been in early 2019 as he's identified as "Chairman Elect" of the Republican Study Committee, and he became Chairman in 2019.

So while I don't think he's wrong - in my opinion, we do need to consider how to rein in spending on all entitlement programs - there's no denying that he does want to cut these programs.

Interesting what will happen when this runs up against Trump's "pretend the problem doesn't exist" campaign.

Posted
4 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

Trump's "pretend the problem doesn't exist" campaign.

Always the orange guy.

 

Never mind we are sure the dems will never talk about those realities. cause they believe they can just tax their way out of it.  you know, the rich need to pay their fair share talking point, while ignoring the rich pay the majority of said receipts.

 

 

 

Since 2020 alone, federal receipts have gone up 25% or a billion dollars per quarter.

 

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/FGRECPT

 

 

 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Tommy Callahan said:

Always the orange guy.

 

Never mind we are sure the dems will never talk about those realities. cause they believe they can just tax their way out of it.  you know, the rich need to pay their fair share talking point, while ignoring the rich pay the majority of said receipts.

 

 

 

Since 2020 alone, federal receipts have gone up 25% or a billion dollars per quarter.

 

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/FGRECPT

 

 

 

 

I agree with you.

But you're missing my point.

Dems = consistent position on cuts to entitlements: No cuts. We will deal with it (tax increases, probably, plus other things like raising the full social security entitlement age again) when the crisis comes.

Repubs = inconsistent position. Deficit hawks in control of the House, a big-time deficit spender as the presidential candidate. It is fair to question "so what DO you want the government to do if you win?"

Posted
7 minutes ago, Tommy Callahan said:

Always the orange guy.

 

Never mind we are sure the dems will never talk about those realities. cause they believe they can just tax their way out of it.  you know, the rich need to pay their fair share talking point, while ignoring the rich pay the majority of said receipts.

 

 

 

Since 2020 alone, federal receipts have gone up 25% or a billion dollars per quarter.

 

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/FGRECPT

 

The "Trump's "pretend the problem doesn't exist" campaign" is pretty funny considering that's what the Dems are doing with entitlements. 

 

But that also begs the question what else did Trump "pretend didn't exist"?

  • Thank you (+1) 1
  • 1 month later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
×
×
  • Create New...