The $2 BILLION dollar question: Why would MBS invest in Jared Kushner?

[All_Pro_Bills]

33 minutes ago, BillStime said:

🎯

What’s funny - this doesn’t even include the amount of money/bribes Trump made off his resorts around the world and his hotel down the street from the WH.

 

Wonder why he sold his license to that hotel after he left the WH?

 

He knows he has no chance in hell of winning the presidency again.

 

 

But Conald will still grift and his pathetic base will pay his way.

 

You're really at the end of your rope here and obviously willing to jump through hoops and bend light to avoid admitting Biden is involved in influence racketeering. Your false comparison of what Trump's kids did or didn't do and the legal and ethical implications vs. the influence peddling racket the Biden's have created in no way absolves Joe and Hunter Biden of running an extortion operation while he was VP and the legal consequences of their payoff operation.   The two have nothing to do with each other.

 

If Kushner's deal stinks then DOJ under the control of Democrats led by AG Garland are free to investigate.  I suggest you ask Merrick why he hasn't.  One reason might be that while throwing up some red flags concerning conflict of interest none of what transpired was hidden or secret.

Edited August 10, 2023 by All_Pro_Bills

[Doc]

2 hours ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

You're really at the end of your rope here and obviously willing to jump through hoops and bend light to avoid admitting Biden is involved in influence racketeering. Your false comparison of what Trump's kids did or didn't do and the legal and ethical implications vs. the influence peddling racket the Biden's have created in no way absolves Joe and Hunter Biden of running an extortion operation while he was VP and the legal consequences of their payoff operation.   The two have nothing to do with each other.

 

If Kushner's deal stinks then DOJ under the control of Democrats led by AG Garland are free to investigate.  I suggest you ask Merrick why he hasn't.  One reason might be that while throwing up some red flags concerning conflict of interest none of what transpired was hidden or secret.

 

Yup.  You'd think they've even come up with some contrived charge at least.

[BillStime]

4 hours ago, Chris farley said:

^^^^^^^^^^^^   A+ logic ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You can’t square it Chris.

 

Its not even close.

 

But continue with your faux outrage hack!

[BillStime]

6 hours ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

end of your rope

oh - ok awe poo- lmao

 

6 hours ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

Biden is involved in influence racketeering

Oh he is? Did you find a receipt under your bed yet?

 

lmao

 

6 hours ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

Trump's kids

Where did Ivanka work?

 

What influence did the POTUS have over those expedited CHINESE patents?

 

Why did the CHINESE rent office space at TRUMP Tower during Conald’s entire tenure?

 

6 hours ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

their payoff operation.

Trump Org

 

6 hours ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

If Kushner's deal stinks then DOJ under the control of Democrats led by AG Garland are free to investigate.  I suggest you ask Merrick why he hasn't.  One reason might be that while throwing up some red flags concerning conflict of interest none of what transpired was hidden or secret.

Don’t you worry - the $2 BILLION DOLLARS to Kushner will blow up in your face just like everything else does for you pathetic sorry people.

 

6 hours ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

end of your rope here and obviously willing to jump through hoops

Still laughing at this one - it must really suck to keep running into concrete walls awwwwweeee pooooh

 

[BillStime]

 

What was Kush Kush doing while working at the WH?

 

 

 

[John from Riverside]

The Trump kids are the thing that Republicans don’t want to talk about
 

How much taxpayer money has been spent on these Hunter Biden investigations not five minutes has been spent on the Trump’s who literally took foreign money right out in the open after having security clearance is in the White House that their daddy had to give them because they shouldn’t have had them

[Doc]

8 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

The Trump kids are the thing that Republicans don’t want to talk about
 

How much taxpayer money has been spent on these Hunter Biden investigations not five minutes has been spent on the Trump’s who literally took foreign money right out in the open after having security clearance is in the White House that their daddy had to give them because they shouldn’t have had them

The Joke Admin is willing to indict Trump for anything and everything.  What's stopping them from going after his kids?  Nothing.  Which tells me there's no there there.

[BillStime]

 

[BillStime]

Oh - what did Hunter do now?

 

 

[BillStime]

Oh!

 

 

[The Frankish Reich]

On 8/16/2023 at 7:18 PM, Doc said:

The Joke Admin is willing to indict Trump for anything and everything.  What's stopping them from going after his kids?  Nothing.  Which tells me there's no there there.

Oh, there's a there there all right.

This is not to excuse Hunter's shady deals and dad's possible role in them. 

But it's not like First Son In Law is all on the up and up. And we all know how his dad just loves the Saudi regime.

[BillsFanNC]

On 8/16/2023 at 9:18 PM, Doc said:

The Joke Admin is willing to indict Trump for anything and everything.  What's stopping them from going after his kids?  Nothing.  Which tells me there's no there there.

 

Or in this case if there actually is something there, going after Kushner would also implicate friends of the regime.

 

Can't have that.

[BillStime]

17 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

Or in this case if there actually is something there, going after Kushner would also implicate friends of the regime.

 

Can't have that.

 

Someone sounds concerned.

[All_Pro_Bills]

18 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

Or in this case if there actually is something there, going after Kushner would also implicate friends of the regime.

 

Can't have that.

One of the village idiots started this topic as a distraction and to present an apples to apples argument of an apples to oranges situation suggesting taking bribes and payoffs from foreign entities in return for as yet unknown political favors while laundering those payments through various shell companies and accounts and then distributing those funds to multiple  parties, including the former VP's son and to the former VP himself, to use the funds for personal use and supporting a lavish lifestyle was equivalent to managing a registered private equity investment fund which took in investment money from a specific foreign official, namely Saudi MBS. 

 

Might there be an 'ethical" issue with the latter?  Perhaps, but there is most likely no legal problem where the former is clearly criminal.  But hey, even though they know its true, nothing short of torturing a confession out of them will ever convince some folks to admit it.  I don't need to name them, do I?   

 

There's nothing more to say here and the moderators, if they exist, should close this topic.

Edited August 31, 2023 by All_Pro_Bills

[The Frankish Reich]

6 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

 

Might there be an 'ethical" issue with the latter?  Perhaps, but there is most likely no legal problem where the former is clearly criminal. 

It's not that dissimilar.

The suggestion - and it came from a WSJ report, not from AOC or something - is that the payments to Kushner, who has yet to come up with any actual investments in Israel, could be seen as a kind of payoff for his father-in-law's unprecedented level of support for the Saudi regime.

So there's legitimate questions: was an advisor deal for Jared discussed during the course of the Trump admin? (Remember, Jared had an official post) What value is Jared providing in exchange for the extraordinarily lucrative deal?

And then on the political side: if Trump is elected, what does he propose to do about his son in law, sometime business associate, and prior White House official being under retainer by the Saudi regime?

6 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

 

There's nothing more to say here and the moderators, if they exist, should close this topic

Well that would be a bit selective, wouldn't it

Edited August 31, 2023 by The Frankish Reich

[BillStime]

6 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

unknown political favors

 

Jamal Khashoggi

[All_Pro_Bills]

Just now, The Frankish Reich said:

It's not that dissimilar.

 

You're kidding me, right?  Secret payoffs and bribes are completely different from investing in a registered fund.  When you pay bribes you expect favors, when you invest money you expect a monetary return.  What else can I tell you?  

[BillStime]

8 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

One of the village idiots started this topic as a distraction and to present an apples to apples argument of an apples to oranges situation suggesting taking bribes and payoffs from foreign entities in return for as yet unknown political favors while laundering those payments through various shell companies and accounts and then distributing those funds to multiple  parties, including the former VP's son and to the former VP himself, to use the funds for personal use and supporting a lavish lifestyle was equivalent to managing a registered private equity investment fund which took in investment money from a specific foreign official, namely Saudi MBS. 

 

Might there be an 'ethical" issue with the latter?  Perhaps, but there is most likely no legal problem where the former is clearly criminal.  But hey, even though they know its true, nothing short of torturing a confession out of them will ever convince some folks to admit it.  I don't need to name them, do I?   

 

There's nothing more to say here and the moderators, if they exist, should close this topic.

 

Concerned much? lmao

 

[The Frankish Reich]

Just now, All_Pro_Bills said:

when you invest money you expect a monetary return.

Except the Saudis have seen no monetary return, and have not closed on any investment opportunities Jared has (in theory) brought to them.

On any level, it is a weird deal. And remember: this is the Saudi sovereign wealth fund. In other words, Saudi royal funds. Government funds. Not a private company.

It's wrong to ask about the origins of this curious deal and what exactly Saudi Arabia expects to get out of it?

[All_Pro_Bills]

1 minute ago, BillStime said:

 

Concerned much? lmao

 

Yes.  Concerned about your ability to comprehend reality.