Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
50 minutes ago, glazeduck said:

There's a lot to like, physically. It's fair to wonder though, why he didn't absolutely dominate in lower division CFB. That's what's keeping me from getting fully onboard. NFL draft history is littered with tons of height/weight/speed freaks who couldn't play WR.

 

At 25 he'd be a pass for me. Moving down (or up from our 2) and he'd be more interesting...

I think averaging 20 yards a catch for your career average  is dominate to me.

Posted
36 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

I have been doing some re-watches over the weekend and I moved Watson up AGAIN on my board. He is now my 23rd overall player. I can see a scenario where he is the guy I want at #25. 

Are you sure that you aren’t talking yourself into him?  A lot of talent AND questions in my opinion.

 

Is he in the conversation at 25?  Maybe, based on test scores and Senior Bowl, but is he a better prospect than, say Booth, Elam, Gordon at CB or Smith, Green, Zion Johnson or prospects that could be available at other positions?


Im not saying that he might not be good or even great, but he is not a sure thing (as no other prospects are, too many either.  Still, can’t help but think his floor is lower than guys from major colleges.  Is he better than George Pickens, for example?  How about Jahan Dotson?  

 

  • Agree 1
Posted

Not a first round prospect.

In the clips posted... or really any of his highlights, take a look at his stride length.

That's a very good thing for straight line speed (i.e. 40 time) but horrible for short and intermediate routes.

 

Any scout will tell you the same. Unpolished routes and can't get in and out of his breaks quickly:

https://www.nfl.com/prospects/christian-watson/32005741-5431-6591-b680-d3a3d3536d62

https://thedraftnetwork.com/player/christian-watson

https://www.profootballnetwork.com/christian-watson-ndsu-wr-nfl-draft-scouting-report-2022/

 

That limits him to posts and go-routes to find his production.

He also doesn't pluck the ball out of the air. More of a body catcher, which you hate to see.

 

Still valuable, but not 1st round valuable. Like DK Metcalf without the power.

He would be a good long-ball guy short term and a decent gamble late 2nd round if he can develop his short-intermediate game.

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)

I would light the table on fire and jump on multiple times if we could get Watson!     The guy's intelligence and intangibles are through the roof--which to me, is what separate the tuely great receivers from the good ones.   

 

Having top-end RAS abilities is the cherry on the cake, as only Stevenson has that kind of speed on the roster right now (and I'm not at all sold on him as a WR).

 

That said, I'm not sure about picking Watson at #25.  I know he's a late riser, based on his senior bowl week, but I'd feel more comfortable at the #30-#40 range.   Still, he'd be a perfect compliment to Diggs and Davis, IMO.

Edited by Shake_My_Head
Posted
Just now, OldTimer1960 said:

Are you sure that you aren’t talking yourself into him?  A lot of talent AND questions in my opinion.

 

Is he in the conversation at 25?  Maybe, based on test scores and Senior Bowl, but is he a better prospect than, say Booth, Elam, Gordon at CB or Smith, Green, Zion Johnson or prospects that could be available at other positions?


Im not saying that he might not be good or even great, but he is not a sure thing (as no other prospects are, too many either.  Still, can’t help but think his floor is lower than guys from major colleges.  Is he better than George Pickens, for example?  How about Jahan Dotson?  

 

 

Booth, no. Gordon, tie. Elam, yes. And the three guards, yes. 

 

I have him WR6, Dotson WR7 and Pickens WR8. I agree he is a lower floor guy. But man, the ceiling is astronomical. He explodes off of press coverage and gets deep fast. I think he is a bit of a one trick pony in a sense but that one trick is winning vertically and scoring touchdowns. 

 

 

Posted

I just don’t understand the receiver at 25 crowd. I mean, are you drafting a guy who will push Davis down the depth chart? Or Crowder out of the lineup? That’s fine, but if not you are drafting a part time player. Like why? 

Posted
Just now, MrEpsYtown said:

I just don’t understand the receiver at 25 crowd. I mean, are you drafting a guy who will push Davis down the depth chart? Or Crowder out of the lineup? That’s fine, but if not you are drafting a part time player. Like why? 

 

That is partly why I hated the Emmanuel Sanders deal. We should have known by now is Gabe a legit #2 receiver. I still think he can be but we don't know because we pissed about for half a season with a geriatric running about out there and Gabe on the bench. 

 

The worry I have is if Gabe isn't up to it as a full time workload or if he or Stef go down we have Jake Kumerow playing outside receiver. That is not something I ever wish to see. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Sad 1
  • Agree 3
Posted (edited)
55 minutes ago, Vickveto said:

Everybody wants him in the second round. That means his value is going to go up he will not make it out of the first round he might not even make it till 25.

Stop it please this guy will be there in the middle of the second round  maybe even 3rd round 

Edited by Putin
  • Disagree 3
  • Agree 1
Posted
Just now, Coach Tuesday said:

He will be 23 when the season starts.  The history of senior WRs transitioning to the NFL is littered with busts.  Would be a very risky pick in Round 1.

 

Oh it is a risky pick. It is a big swing for the fences. I do think he is slightly different from the normal senior WRs though. They are normally guys who are technically proficient and have racked up big numbers in college but then are not athletically gifted enough for the pros. Watson is the opposite of that. 

 

But no doubt it is risky.

Posted
8 minutes ago, Rigotz said:

Not a first round prospect.

In the clips posted... or really any of his highlights, take a look at his stride length.

That's a very good thing for straight line speed (i.e. 40 time) but horrible for short and intermediate routes.

Gotta disagree.  He's a very fluid runner even with that stride, much like Moss was.   He can change direction at speed, without downshifting, which is very unique for a 6'4" guy.   There's a ton of highlight video with him weaving through DBs after the catch and he'll be a RAC monster, IMO. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, Rigotz said:

Not a first round prospect.

In the clips posted... or really any of his highlights, take a look at his stride length.

That's a very good thing for straight line speed (i.e. 40 time) but horrible for short and intermediate routes.


Literally came here to post that the kid has “Josh Allen strides”.

 

I wonder if having long strides at top speed means a player necessarily isn’t as good of a short/intermediate runner. 
 

Maybe the long strides only happen once he has hit top speed?

 

10 minutes ago, MrEpsYtown said:

I just don’t understand the receiver at 25 crowd. I mean, are you drafting a guy who will push Davis down the depth chart? Or Crowder out of the lineup? That’s fine, but if not you are drafting a part time player. Like why? 


Outside of - and maybe including depending on Dane Jackson or FA additions to come - CB2, that might describe any player we draft given our roster-wide depth. 

Edited by JohnBonhamRocks
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Oh it is a risky pick. It is a big swing for the fences. I do think he is slightly different from the normal senior WRs though. They are normally guys who are technically proficient and have racked up big numbers in college but then are not athletically gifted enough for the pros. Watson is the opposite of that. 

 

But no doubt it is risky.


But at the very least you’d expect him to dominate lower-level competition he played against and he didn’t even do THAT.  Twice the risk, really.

  • Agree 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

That is partly why I hated the Emmanuel Sanders deal. We should have known by now is Gabe a legit #2 receiver. I still think he can be but we don't know because we pissed about for half a season with a geriatric running about out there and Gabe on the bench. 

 

The worry I have is if Gabe isn't up to it as a full time workload or if he or Stef go down we have Jake Kumerow playing outside receiver. That is not something I ever wish to see. 


100% we need to draft guys there, but does it have to be a 1? I guess if its BPA that’s fine, or if a guy like Williams falls. I don’t hate the idea of Watson because I don’t know how much he can help us this year anyway. But it certainly adds a high upside development piece who could in theory replace Diggs eventually. But yeah we need a corner bad, and unless all those 1st round corners are all gone, I can’t see us going anywhere else in round 1. 

Posted
7 minutes ago, MrEpsYtown said:

I just don’t understand the receiver at 25 crowd. I mean, are you drafting a guy who will push Davis down the depth chart? Or Crowder out of the lineup? That’s fine, but if not you are drafting a part time player. Like why? 

 

 

I'll go back to me tryna' sell TSW on the Bills standing pat and drafting the best defensive player in the 2014 draft....... Aaron Donald........when the Bills already had a stacked DL.........they didn't "need" one right then..........but first round picks aren't necessarily about 1st year results.   Dude became the best defensive player of this century so far and is still playing at a superstar level.

 

And Gabe Davis doesn't have the All Pro track record of those Bills DL .......... he is a 500-something yard receiver the past 2 seasons.    

 

He is a projection who failed to beat out a tired Emmanuel Sanders,  struggled with a foot injury yet again,  had a terrible in-season game where he had like 3 catches on 13 targets and also had a costly drop in the Jags loss and missed the second NE game entirely because he wore too much tinfoil under his helmet.   

 

People are so fixated on the playoff game vs KC that they think the Bills have the best 1-2 combo in the league or something.    They don't.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Vomit 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, JohnBonhamRocks said:


Literally came here to post that the kid has “Josh Allen strides”.

 

I wonder if having long strides at top speed means a player necessarily isn’t as good of a short/intermediate runner. 
 

Maybe the long strides only happen once he has hit top speed?

 


Outside of - and maybe including depending on Dane Jackson or FA additions to come - CB2, that might describe any player we draft given our roster-wide depth. 


Really good point here. That’s why I think you should package some picks and try to move up a bit to add one of those top corners. 
 

My hope is that these teams overdraft QBs and go bonkers for these offensive linemen letting the corners slip. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
32 minutes ago, OldTimer1960 said:

Are you sure that you aren’t talking yourself into him?  A lot of talent AND questions in my opinion.

 

Is he in the conversation at 25?  Maybe, based on test scores and Senior Bowl, but is he a better prospect than, say Booth, Elam, Gordon at CB or Smith, Green, Zion Johnson or prospects that could be available at other positions?


Im not saying that he might not be good or even great, but he is not a sure thing (as no other prospects are, too many either.  Still, can’t help but think his floor is lower than guys from major colleges.  Is he better than George Pickens, for example?  How about Jahan Dotson?  

 

I’m taking Jahan Dotson over him that’s just personal choice 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
35 minutes ago, OldTimer1960 said:

Are you sure that you aren’t talking yourself into him?  A lot of talent AND questions in my opinion.

 

Is he in the conversation at 25?  Maybe, based on test scores and Senior Bowl, but is he a better prospect than, say Booth, Elam, Gordon at CB or Smith, Green, Zion Johnson or prospects that could be available at other positions?


Im not saying that he might not be good or even great, but he is not a sure thing (as no other prospects are, too many either.  Still, can’t help but think his floor is lower than guys from major colleges.  Is he better than George Pickens, for example?  How about Jahan Dotson?  

 

I agree with this.  That’s said….as a fan, I’d be happy with Watson, Dotson or Pickens, especially if we land a vet corner.  

  • Like (+1) 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...