Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

I dont understand how any of this works.....my math is broken


 

We won’t know until we see the entire contract, but the idea is that the Bears had a little over 8.8 million for the first 2 years - so if split evenly- 4.4 in year 1 would be his cost.

 

Currently the Bills had to save a placeholder for his Tendered money of 2.8 million in the salary cap. 
 

So they new deal would only add the difference between 4.4 (new cost) and 2.8 already accounted for.  
 

So an increase of around 2 million depending upon the final contract numbers.

 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

I dont understand how any of this works.....my math is broken

The tender he was under already counted against the cap so only the difference between the two is being added.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Rochesterfan said:


 

We won’t know until we see the entire contract, but the idea is that the Bears had a little over 8.8 million for the first 2 years - so if split evenly- 4.4 in year 1 would be his cost.

 

Currently the Bills had to save a placeholder for his Tendered money of 2.4 million in the salary cap. 
 

So they new deal would only add the difference between 4.4 (new cost) and 2.4 already accounted for.  
 

So an increase of around 2 million depending upon the final contract numbers.

 

 

FYP.

Posted

What would the Bills be paying him if they had offered him a second-round tender? Just wondering if that was just a flat-out mistake not to. 

  • Disagree 1
Posted
Just now, finn said:

What would the Bills be paying him if they had offered him a second-round tender? Just wondering if that was just a flat-out mistake not to. 

$3.98M for 1 year. 

 

Then he'd be a UFA next season with a good chance he gets a bigger deal than he did here.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, HappyDays said:

 

At this point I'd be surprised if our 1st round pick is anything other than CB or WR. That seems to be where the need will match the value.

 

Yep, fill the CB void, add a solid new/cheap guy to the WR room…….and move to the NFC and we have NAILED the off-season!   :)

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
1 minute ago, finn said:

What would the Bills be paying him if they had offered him a second-round tender? Just wondering if that was just a flat-out mistake not to. 

 

I believe the figure was $3.9M.

 

Beane lost the battle........that shouldn't be contested..........but if Bates pans out he will have won the war. 

 

My big issue with letting Bates walk is that it's so often lamented that even early drafted OL stink for the first few years in the league............so losing Bates on the cheap only to have to replace him with an early pick after you spent all that time seasoning him would have been a SMH situation.

 

(Actual footage of Bates being seasoned)

 

seasoning.gif

Posted

The Pegulas have really opened the purse strings. We are really going for it this year before Josh’s contract means a fair bit of shedding other players.
Two CB’s and a WR or pass-catching RB in first three rounds of the draft.

Posted
2 hours ago, Steptide said:

So does that mean bates has to sign back with the bills? Or does he have the option to sign with bears also 

 

No, the whole point of the "right of first refusal" is if the Bills match the Bears offer, he has to sign with the Bills

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, DabillsDaBillsDaBills said:

Final grades on this situation will be pending the contract details, but I have to say it looks like a minor mistake on Beane's part to not go for the 2nd rd tender. 

 

It will be interesting. IF he plays really good this year we'll have him locked in for a bit.

 

Still, def a gamble and something that could backfire.

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...