Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
42 minutes ago, ganesh said:

I think Bates continues to play at LG and Saffold moves in to RG.

They will need two as it si not clear when White will be back


Saffold said he’ll be playing LG. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Rochesterfan said:

Because instead of 5 games as a starter - after next year - he has hopefully over 20 games as a starter and as an unrestricted FA with prices going up - most likely cashes in at a bigger rate.

 

Bates is a nice fit with Kromer - who like athletic lineman and should be an excellent fit and benefit from better coaching in a better scheme fit.

 

Basically your idea is a very short term savings of 250K for this year and then hope you can get something done as a FA next year.

 

Beane decided that a small increase this year might be worth the long term stability of the added 3 years he got on this deal.

 

Short term and I mean very short term your contract saves a tiny bit.  Long term planning - Beane has you beat badly in this.  
 

Sorry, but you are just wrong as far as most seem to be concerned.

 

In fact Beane likely got Bates more offers including longer term offer without 2nd round pick since teams were not required to give Bills a 2nd round pick.

With a 2nd pick required less teams will be bringing him in offer and less competition.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, Doc said:


Saffold said he’ll be playing LG. 

I'm not sure how definite he was about it, he did also clarify that he's played everywhere on the line.

Edited by Warcodered
Posted
1 minute ago, Warcodered said:

I'm not sure how definite he was about he did also clarify that he's played everywhere on the line.

 

IIRC he said something to the effect, he's willing to play either guard position but for now, he's been told to plan on LG

Posted
1 minute ago, Limeaid said:

 

In fact Beane likely got Bates more offers including longer term offer without 2nd round pick since teams were not required to give Bills a 2nd round pick.

With a 2nd pick required less teams will be bringing him in offer and less competition.


 

With the 2nd round tender - no one was going to make an offer.  
 

The 2nd round tender for a guard was the stupidest way to go because it meant paying him 3.9 million for the year AND then he gets to be a FA next year with and entire year of film available.

 

Instead we get a 4 year deal locked into place with a touch more up front and a better bargain later on.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Agree 4
Posted
1 minute ago, Doc said:


Saffold said he’ll be playing LG. 

 

I thought offense line coach Aaron Kromer was in charge of who plays where? 

He may have been told he is going to play LG but if he believes Bates as LG and Saffold is RG is better combination that is what they will go with.

 

Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

IIRC he said something to the effect, he's willing to play either guard position but for now, he's been told to plan on LG

Beane also said that Saffold would be playing next to Dion Dawkins

Edited by YoloinOhio
Posted
7 minutes ago, Rochesterfan said:

With the 2nd round tender - no one was going to make an offer.  

 

I disagree there was not a chance no one would make an offer.  Teams do make offers I cannot believe.

But odds were better this way.

Posted
6 hours ago, BillsFanForever19 said:

 

At first I was confused as to why they didn't put him on a 2nd round tender so they could have had him for cheaper with no competition.

 

But now that I think about it, I wonder if this was what Beane wanted all along. He wanted Bates to sign a long term deal with another team so that he could get Bates locked up long term at what his market is now after a small sample size. As opposed to what he perceives his market will be after a full year as a starter.

 

Caution:  LAMP

 

It's what I have posted numerous times in these Bates threads.

Beane played this perfect.

 

IF Beane put a 2nd Round Tender on Bates no teams would of bid on him.  Then the Bills would of had him as a starter at $4M for

1 year.  Next year after Bates was starting he would be an UFA wanting a LOT more.

 

Beane is playing "Pinochle" and the rest are playing "Go Fish".

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 5
  • Eyeroll 1
  • Agree 1
Posted

Reading through this thread and realizing that this was Beane's plan all along, I have to say he is probably the best financial GM in the league. His drafts and overall talent evaluation haven't been stellar. But he knows better than anyone how to structure contracts and manipulate the salary cap to win now without sacrificing the future. He uses rules that most of us didn't even know existed to his advantage. All of us are panicking about the interior OL, meanwhile Beane is sitting back waiting patiently to lock up a young OG with upside for 4 years with a more than reasonable AAV. His moves don't always work out but they always make a lot of sense, which is a quality that has been lacking at OBD for the past 20+ years.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Disagree 1
  • Agree 4
Posted
1 minute ago, HappyDays said:

Reading through this thread and realizing that this was Beane's plan all along, I have to say he is probably the best financial GM in the league. His drafts and overall talent evaluation haven't been stellar. But he knows better than anyone how to structure contracts and manipulate the salary cap to win now without sacrificing the future. He uses rules that most of us didn't even know existed to his advantage. All of us are panicking about the interior OL, meanwhile Beane is sitting back waiting patiently to lock up a young OG with upside for 4 years with a more than reasonable AAV. His moves don't always work out but they always make a lot of sense, which is a quality that has been lacking at OBD for the past 20+ years.


He really needs to nail this draft. They might only have 4 or 5 guys drafted who make the final 53 so they need to make them count. Quality over quantity should be his approach to the draft this year, as they really don’t have any major holes, assuming he adds at least 1 corner before the draft, which I am expecting. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Motor26 said:


He really needs to nail this draft. They might only have 4 or 5 guys drafted who make the final 53 so they need to make them count. Quality over quantity should be his approach to the draft this year, as they really don’t have any major holes, assuming he adds at least 1 corner before the draft, which I am expecting. 

 

Agree with quality of quantity but with the exception of CB. P and a KR none of these rookies will probably crack a starter role.

They will be in the mix later in the season and next year.  It's about filing the pipeline.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, Motor26 said:

Quality over quantity should be his approach to the draft this year, as they really don’t have any major holes, assuming he adds at least 1 corner before the draft, which I am expecting. 

 

I have come around to the idea that we should give up our 3rd rounder to move up in the 2nd. Based on the draft value chart that could get us from pick 57 to picks 43 or 44 with Atlanta and Cleveland respectively. Both of those teams could use the extra draft capital. Give me 2 players between 25 and 45 that have a good chance of contributing this year, ideally a CB and a WR in either order. No hesitation I'd sacrifice the 3rd round for that return.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, ColoradoBills said:

 

Agree with quality of quantity but with the exception of CB. P and a KR none of these rookies will probably crack a starter role.

They will be in the mix later in the season and next year.  It's about filing the pipeline.


Looking at the depth chart the only real holes are WR4, backup IOL, number 3 TE, CB, and P. Could always use edge rushers and more DBs, but starters wise I agree with you. WR4 could end up being WR2 next year, and TE3 could be TE2 or even 1 if they can’t keep Knox, and backup IOL will replace Saffold so even though they aren’t starters, they’re going to be important pieces to have for the future. I doubt Tre is ready week 1 and I don’t want them to rush him back if they can get by with Dane + early draft pick on the outside. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
4 hours ago, BullBuchanan said:

my bad, I read through the first 5 or so pages and the last couple. That said, I don't at all agree it was correct.

 

I don't see the argument that this was a bad move. Why would you take a solid OLman for 1 year $4m and then they hit free agency, over 4 years $17m? Is it just the small sample size or what?

Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, ColoradoBills said:

Shout out for the Sabres with a game winning goal with 10 seconds left.

 

Team is turning around!

We forget, even with Eichel and Reinhart they were drafting #1 overall multiple years. There’s a lot of talented young players in the system. This time it’s more about team building. Goalie is the piece they’re missing:

Edited by Buffalo_Stampede
  • Agree 2
Posted

Glad to hear Bates will be back. Somewhat surprised it will cost so little.

 

Good news.

 

As for the whole "It's down to CB" movement, there's lots of time left and lots of FAs available before the draft. 

  • Like (+1) 2
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...