Jump to content

Is Clarence Thomas conflicted?  

43 members have voted

  1. 1. Is Clarence Thomas conflicted?

    • Yes
      27
    • No
      16


Recommended Posts

Posted
22 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

At the bottom of it all.

 

The left hates conservative people of color

 

 

They hate when they escape from the plantation...

  • Agree 1
Posted
11 hours ago, Big Blitz said:


Who’s still paying for Cable or HBO Max and why?  

 

I do.  I hate paying for a millions streaming services which end up costing about the same.  And Oliver is an idiot with one of the most punchable faces ever.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
On 2/19/2024 at 8:18 AM, BillStime said:

 

The John Oliver clip is funny. 

But as is all too often the case, his 15 minutes of picking apart how corrupt and compromised Clarence Thomas really is does a far better job than the mainstream media accounts. It's just a staggering record of taking huge gifts from powerful people who are very interested (in a financial sense) in the rulings of the Supreme Court.

Posted (edited)
On 2/19/2024 at 6:55 PM, B-Man said:

 

 

At the bottom of it all.

 

The left hates conservative people of color

 

 

 

I'm going to guess John Oliver and many lefties were not paying attention during the high tech lynching of uppity blacks by Senators Biden and Kennedy (like he had any room to talk) and others.  I guess maybe I can somewhat understand John since he was in Junior High at the time.  I do remember cuz I watched or listened to most of it.  Supreme Court hearings were never like this til these 2 clowns got in charge.

 

But after Justice Thomas won, he testified to the committee that he was 42 years old and would serve as a Supreme Court Justice for 42 years.  He's still got 9 years to go so suck it up if you don't like him.  It's payback time and it's a B word.

 

I think Senators Biden and Kennedy and others attempted the high tech lynching of uppity blacks cuz he is black.  He replaced Justice Thurgood Marshall who was nominated by President Johnson.  Only Democrats should be able to put blacks on the Supreme Court so as to keep the black vote and to perpetuate the myth they aren't racists and do nice things for black people.  So they attempted to ruin him.  Nice try Uncle Joe.  You reap what you sow.

 

Edited by reddogblitz
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
On 2/20/2024 at 7:17 PM, Big Blitz said:


Who’s still paying for Cable or HBO Max and why?  

More bad hot legal takes from MAGA world. This time from a guy with a profile pic that looks like he's about 14 years old.

 

It is perfectly legal. It is no different than a law firm saying that Clarence Thomas will have a million dollar a year job as soon as he retires. That law firm would have to then avoid taking any cases before the Supreme Court until Thomas retires, just as John Oliver should hope he never personally has a case before the Supreme Court. But there's nothing illegal about it. It's not a bribe because there is no inducement to take any kind of official act. The money would be paid only when Thomas resigns.

Posted
8 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said:

More bad hot legal takes from MAGA world. This time from a guy with a profile pic that looks like he's about 14 years old.

 

It is perfectly legal. 


 

Nah bro.  
 

It definitely was a coup.  
 

The best coup.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

 

 

They just can't stop embarrassing themselves.  :w00t:

 

 

One of the big stories in the New York Times today is another Clarence Thomas smear, but with a twist:

“Justice Thomas Hires Law Clerk Accused of Sending Racist Text Messages.”

 

The story is about Crystal Clanton, who graduated from the Antonin Scalia Law School at George Mason University in 2022. She is coming off a clerkship with Judge William Pryor of the 11th Circuit, who calls her “an outstanding law clerk.” Justice Thomas has now hired her to clerk on the Supreme Court.

 

For the last seven years, Crystal Clanton has been dogged by reports of an email that she allegedly wrote, in which she supposedly said, “I hate black people.” The Times story admits that they have not seen any such message, and are relying on reporting by the New Yorker’s Jane Mayer, perhaps the least trustworthy source in America.

 

{snip}

 

Clanton didn’t respond to the Times’s request for comment in the story they published today, but back in 2017 she told The New Yorker that “I have no recollection of these messages and they do not reflect what I believe or who I am, and the same was true when I was a teenager.”

 

So there the matter rests. The moral of the story, I suppose, is that the Left never forgets. No matter that she was cleared by an investigation by one of the nation’s courts of appeals; once the Left gets its hands on a smear it never lets go. It will never stop trying to destroy your life. And of course, The New Yorker and the New York Times are two of the worst offenders.

 

Also, what makes this old story worthy of the Times’s A section? Only the fact that Justice Thomas is involved. The Times doesn’t care about a law clerk of whom few people have heard, but it cares deeply about smearing the country’s top conservative African-American. But what, exactly, are we supposed to infer from the Times story? That Clarence Thomas is weirdly favorable to those who hate black people?

 

 

A final irony: Supreme Court justices have no doubt hired any number of clerks who have written and spoken favorably about DEI, which actually is racist. But there is no controversy there: on the contrary, endorsing that form of racism is a badge of honor.

 

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2024/02/clarence-thomas-racist.php

 

 

 

.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

And this is why the Supreme Court will play a role in the upcoming election.

 

These two crooks no longer wish to continue in their current roles and need Trump to win to maintain their majority.

 

 

×
×
  • Create New...