Doc Posted February 12 Posted February 12 53 minutes ago, wnyguy said: And in fact after Trump said that the NATO allies decided they would pony up their fair share. Funny how that worked out, ain't it ? Yup. That was Trump "trying to destroy NATO." By making everyone pay more into it. 3
All_Pro_Bills Posted February 12 Posted February 12 51 minutes ago, wnyguy said: And in fact after Trump said that the NATO allies decided they would pony up their fair share. Funny how that worked out, ain't it ? Logic isn't a strong suit of the left. How could it be? Most of what they believe is based denial of reality. In this case not understanding the concept of conditional logic. If, Then, Else. 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: Live free or die? Give me liberty or give me death? In your fairy tale is the hero of the story a guy from New Hampshire impersonating Patrick Henry? 4
Tiberius Posted February 12 Posted February 12 5 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said: Logic isn't a strong suit of the left. How could it be? Most of what they believe is based denial of reality. In this case not understanding the concept of conditional logic. If, Then, Else. In your fairy tale is the hero of the story a guy from New Hampshire impersonating Patrick Henry? In your fairy tale of appeasement, do the Russians always win?
BillStime Posted February 12 Author Posted February 12 1 hour ago, wnyguy said: And in fact after Trump said that the NATO allies decided they would pony up their fair share. Funny how that worked out, ain't it ? Trump has a history of wanting to pull the US out of NATO. When he knew he politically couldn't do that (during his first term) - he decided to embarrass our allies about their dues. July 21, 2016 | Donald Trump Remarks on NATO Trigger Alarm Bells in Europe
All_Pro_Bills Posted February 12 Posted February 12 6 minutes ago, Tiberius said: In your fairy tale of appeasement, do the Russians always win? You should concern yourself with the fact that almost every intervention run out of Washington have been failures. And do some objective thinking about why? The fact in this situation is nobody appeased Russia. If I'm wrong tell me who is appeasing them? My belief that the Washington uni-party screws up everything it touches doesn't mean I'm an isolationist or an appeaser. It means I think the people making the decisions are idiots. Unfortunately this is another failure. As for all intents and purposes the war in Ukraine is already over. You'll figure that out eventually.
sherpa Posted February 12 Posted February 12 5 hours ago, Tiberius said: This is what you said: It was an ill-considered, unnecessary, almost flippant comment deeply criticizing our best ally and only democracy in the region, a region a spark away from conflagration. I'd say the exact same thing now. It was senseless, and he has no way of knowing what he was talking about.
BillStime Posted February 12 Author Posted February 12 6 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said: You should concern yourself with the fact that almost every intervention run out of Washington have been failures. Don't let the door hit you on the way out... enjoy Moscow.
Tiberius Posted February 12 Posted February 12 6 minutes ago, sherpa said: I'd say the exact same thing now. It was senseless, and he has no way of knowing what he was talking about. Glad he wasn't calling troops losers and suckers
sherpa Posted February 12 Posted February 12 5 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Glad he wasn't calling troops losers and suckers I spent a little time looking at the evidence of this. It seems there really isn't any. The man says enough goofy stuff, but I think this is fiction. Either way it is completely unrelated to judging one of our greatest allies actions as being indiscriminate; actions he is incapable of knowing the details about. 1
Tiberius Posted February 12 Posted February 12 6 minutes ago, sherpa said: I spent a little time looking at the evidence of this. It seems there really isn't any. The man says enough goofy stuff, but I think this is fiction. Either way it is completely unrelated to judging one of our greatest allies actions as being indiscriminate; actions he is incapable of knowing the details about. Ya, sure he didn't say it. You saying General Kelly is liar? No one who thinks that way about American servicemen and women should be President Those defending this guy are twisted individuals
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted February 12 Posted February 12 3 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Ya, sure he didn't say it. You saying General Kelly is liar? No one who thinks that way about American servicemen and women should be President Those defending this guy are twisted individuals Well u defend a turnip any chance you get so......... 1
Pokebball Posted February 12 Posted February 12 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: In your fairy tale of appeasement, do the Russians always win? signed, Iran
Niagara Bill Posted February 13 Posted February 13 6 hours ago, BillStime said: Carlson, Trumps Sec of State appointment or Putins PR man. Maybe both😁
JaCrispy Posted February 13 Posted February 13 (edited) 7 hours ago, BillStime said: Trump has a history of wanting to pull the US out of NATO. When he knew he politically couldn't do that (during his first term) - he decided to embarrass our allies about their dues. July 21, 2016 | Donald Trump Remarks on NATO Trigger Alarm Bells in Europe What’s worse- embarrassing our allies, or blowing up their oil pipeline? 😎 Edited February 13 by JaCrispy 1
BillStime Posted February 13 Author Posted February 13 10 minutes ago, JaCrispy said: What’s worse- embarrassing our allies, or blowing up their oil pipeline? 😎 Oh precious you’re trying real hard tonight - lmao
Recommended Posts