BillStime Posted February 10 Author Posted February 10 3 minutes ago, sherpa said: He isn't my buddy, and that has nothing to do with Russia invading Poland and Germany. You will have something when that occurs and you can quote my claim that it is preposterous. Until then, you can throw stupid stuff at the wall and be laughed at. Your boy has upstaged you idiots every single day. Keep spinning
BillStime Posted February 10 Author Posted February 10 4 hours ago, sherpa said: There is zero chance Russia does what you have suggested It didn’t take very long for Trump to stick his foot in your mouth. Idiots
All_Pro_Bills Posted February 10 Posted February 10 (edited) 1 minute ago, BillStime said: It didn’t take very long for Trump to stick his foot in your mouth. Idiots Given its aggressive tone it's more likely NATO attacks Russia. Edited February 10 by All_Pro_Bills
BillStime Posted February 10 Author Posted February 10 Just now, All_Pro_Bills said: Given its aggressive tone it's more likely NATO attacks Russia. Aggressive tone? What tone?
All_Pro_Bills Posted February 10 Posted February 10 Just now, BillStime said: Aggressive tone? What tone? War games on Russia's border with 90k troops and equipment. That tone.
BillStime Posted February 10 Author Posted February 10 Just now, All_Pro_Bills said: War games on Russia's border with 90k troops and equipment. That tone. ~TWO YEARS after Putin invaded a sovereign country? GTFOH you freakn Putin ball washer. jfc 3
sherpa Posted February 10 Posted February 10 4 minutes ago, BillStime said: It didn’t take very long for Trump to stick his foot in your mouth. Idiots You are obviously too stupid to figure this out, nor capable of reading. Everything I have said here relates to Russia invading Poland or Germany. You continue to suggest I am talking about Trump, which has not occurred. To be responded to, you have to make sense. You don't. 1 1
BillStime Posted February 10 Author Posted February 10 Just now, BillsFanNC said: T. D. S. Truth hurts Karen Psyop - doesn’t? 3 minutes ago, sherpa said: You are obviously too stupid to figure this out, nor capable of reading. Everything I have said here relates to Russia invading Poland or Germany. You continue to suggest I am talking about Trump, which has not occurred. To be responded to, you have to make sense. You don't. It all comes down to Trump you idiot - he gets in power again kiss NATO goodbye. idiots everywhere
Doc Posted February 10 Posted February 10 1 hour ago, sherpa said: You are obviously too stupid to figure this out, nor capable of reading. Everything I have said here relates to Russia invading Poland or Germany. You continue to suggest I am talking about Trump, which has not occurred. To be responded to, you have to make sense. You don't. Never mind that in the clip it provides, Trump was talking about countries that don't pay into NATO. Not countries that do. It's the same stupid ***** with them. 1 1
All_Pro_Bills Posted February 11 Posted February 11 3 hours ago, BillStime said: ~TWO YEARS after Putin invaded a sovereign country? GTFOH you freakn Putin ball washer. jfc Triggered? But please don't cry. And your fake outrage? Don't care and don't flatter yourself. Anybody that's been in a fight knows it started before the first punch. This war started on 2014. 10 years ago with the coup in Kyev. You morons have yourselves believing Russia is going to invade the rest of Europe. But I'm at a loss to identify just what they want with those failing countries? Sadly and regardless of his actions Putin is running circles around old senile Joe Biden. We need some real leadership and let grandpa Joe take a nap. And by how cranky you sound you need a nap or maybe a timeout in the corner. 1 1 1
Doc Posted February 11 Posted February 11 38 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said: Triggered? But please don't cry. And your fake outrage? Don't care and don't flatter yourself. Anybody that's been in a fight knows it started before the first punch. This war started on 2014. 10 years ago with the coup in Kyev. You morons have yourselves believing Russia is going to invade the rest of Europe. But I'm at a loss to identify just what they want with those failing countries? Sadly and regardless of his actions Putin is running circles around old senile Joe Biden. We need some real leadership and let grandpa Joe take a nap. And by how cranky you sound you need a nap or maybe a timeout in the corner. They're hoping everyone forgets...because it started under Barry. I wonder if Barry knew beforehand, which is what led him to tell Medvedev on a hot mic for Putin to wait until he gets re-elected? And they've been told to believe Putin will start invading NATO countries. Because he's doing such a great job with a corrupt non-NATO one...
Tiberius Posted February 11 Posted February 11 16 hours ago, sherpa said: You are obviously too stupid to figure this out, nor capable of reading. Everything I have said here relates to Russia invading Poland or Germany. You continue to suggest I am talking about Trump, which has not occurred. To be responded to, you have to make sense. You don't. What do you think of Trump's comments about encouraging Russia? You complained that Biden's comments about Israel were dangerous, how about Trump, NATO and Russia?
Joe Ferguson forever Posted February 11 Posted February 11 Manchurian candidate propped up by Manchurian posters here: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13070181/Donald-Trump-encourage-Russia-attack-NATO.html
B-Man Posted February 11 Posted February 11 Did The Guardian properly paraphrase Trump here: "Donald Trump says he would encourage Russia to attack Nato allies who pay too little." I'm skeptical. Let's find the actual quote in the text of the article. On Saturday, Trump claimed that during an unspecified Nato meeting he told a fellow head of state that the US under his leadership would not defend any countries who were “delinquent”.“One of the presidents of a big country stood up and said, ‘Well, sir, if we don’t pay, and we’re attacked by Russia, will you protect us?’” Trump said, adding “I said, ‘You didn’t pay, you’re delinquent?’” “No, I would not protect you. In fact, I would encourage them to do whatever the hell they want. You got to pay. You got to pay your bills.” 1. It may have been said during a private meeting, but he's repeating it out loud, so Russia can hear it. 2. The statement, in context, is made to pressure the president of France to pay up, and, as the story is retold, it was in response to the French president, who revealed that he was counting on us to protect his country whether he paid or not. One might say, this is "art of the deal" back-and-forth, showing Trump is a tough negotiator, and who knows if he's bluffing? The point is, you don't want to find out. But, of course, it's a distressingly big-stakes bluff. That's how Trump does it. And we know that Trump got the payments. https://althouse.blogspot.com/2024/02/did-guardian-properly-paraphrase-trump.html 1 2
Doc Posted February 11 Posted February 11 27 minutes ago, B-Man said: Did The Guardian properly paraphrase Trump here: "Donald Trump says he would encourage Russia to attack Nato allies who pay too little." I'm skeptical. Let's find the actual quote in the text of the article. On Saturday, Trump claimed that during an unspecified Nato meeting he told a fellow head of state that the US under his leadership would not defend any countries who were “delinquent”.“One of the presidents of a big country stood up and said, ‘Well, sir, if we don’t pay, and we’re attacked by Russia, will you protect us?’” Trump said, adding “I said, ‘You didn’t pay, you’re delinquent?’” “No, I would not protect you. In fact, I would encourage them to do whatever the hell they want. You got to pay. You got to pay your bills.” 1. It may have been said during a private meeting, but he's repeating it out loud, so Russia can hear it. 2. The statement, in context, is made to pressure the president of France to pay up, and, as the story is retold, it was in response to the French president, who revealed that he was counting on us to protect his country whether he paid or not. One might say, this is "art of the deal" back-and-forth, showing Trump is a tough negotiator, and who knows if he's bluffing? The point is, you don't want to find out. But, of course, it's a distressingly big-stakes bluff. That's how Trump does it. And we know that Trump got the payments. https://althouse.blogspot.com/2024/02/did-guardian-properly-paraphrase-trump.html This is what I said in the other thread. 1
aristocrat Posted February 11 Posted February 11 4 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Manchurian candidate propped up by Manchurian posters here: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13070181/Donald-Trump-encourage-Russia-attack-NATO.html Should other nato countries pay their fair share? Yes or no
sherpa Posted February 11 Posted February 11 6 hours ago, Tiberius said: What do you think of Trump's comments about encouraging Russia? You complained that Biden's comments about Israel were dangerous, how about Trump, NATO and Russia? Foolish, unnecessary and undisciplined. Same as always. It's what he does when he gets wound up while speaking. The performance of some of our NATO allies has been disgraceful, but there are other ways to bring that point into the light.
Tiberius Posted February 11 Posted February 11 19 minutes ago, sherpa said: Foolish, unnecessary and undisciplined. Same as always. It's what he does when he gets wound up while speaking. The performance of some of our NATO allies has been disgraceful, but there are other ways to bring that point into the light. Not dangerous though? So Biden makes a comment, and its a threat to peace, Trump invites a psychopathic, murderous dictator to attack our allies and its just foolish Ok
Recommended Posts