Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
11 minutes ago, Kemp said:

On page 96, still no evidence of Joe Biden taking a bribe.

Enjoy.

You guys screamed for years to see Trump’s tax returns. How about the Biden’s volunteering to show us their bank records? That’d put an end to all of this.Β 

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
14 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

You guys screamed for years to see Trump’s tax returns. How about the Biden’s volunteering to show us their bank records? That’d put an end to all of this.Β 

what about if it snows in June in FloridaΒ 

Posted
25 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

You guys screamed for years to see Trump’s tax returns. How about the Biden’s volunteering to show us their bank records? That’d put an end to all of this.Β 

Would it? Β This scenario involves the leader of the free world. Β We would need a deep dive into every aspect of his and the good doctor’s financial records, by an organization capable to that sort of forensic investigation.Β 
Β 

What you’re suggesting would be a great place to start, and JB certainly has nothing to fear by providing all these records if he’s clean. Β 
Β 

This is why it’s important to pursue Hunter aggressively. Β Perhaps if he faced real time in jail, he would consider exchanging information for a reduced sentence. Β If there’s nothing to share, no harm or foul.
Β 

Β 

Posted
4 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Would it? Β This scenario involves the leader of the free world. Β We would need a deep dive into every aspect of his and the good doctor’s financial records, by an organization capable to that sort of forensic investigation.Β 
Β 

What you’re suggesting would be a great place to start, and JB certainly has nothing to fear by providing all these records if he’s clean. Β 
Β 

This is why it’s important to pursue Hunter aggressively. Β Perhaps if he faced real time in jail, he would consider exchanging information for a reduced sentence. Β If there’s nothing to share, no harm or foul.
Β 

Β 

It should, if anyone actually wanted to put an end to all of this outright corruption. But they don’t. They just want to score ridiculous political points. Looking into Joe Biden’s personal finances is simply not that difficult.Β 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

It should, if anyone actually wanted to put an end to all of this outright corruption. But they don’t. They just want to score ridiculous political points. Looking into Joe Biden’s personal finances is simply not that difficult.Β 


Isn’t the House investigating this? They can subpoena Biden’s financial records. They even have a very recent SCOTUS decision that gives them ammo to do so.Β 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
47 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:


Isn’t the House investigating this? They can subpoena Biden’s financial records. They even have a very recent SCOTUS decision that gives them ammo to do so.Β 

And they should.Β 

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, SoCal Deek said:

You guys screamed for years to see Trump’s tax returns. How about the Biden’s volunteering to show us their bank records? That’d put an end to all of this.Β 

Β 

You might recall that the committee said they HAD the proof months ago.

Obviously, they were lying, unless it's your contention that they're total morons.

At least it's finally good to hear you say that the heading of this thread remains unproven, at best, an outright lie, at worst.

Now, Deek will pivot because he knows I'm being accurate and what else can he or the other Trumpers do, besides pivot?

I admit that this is kinda fun for me.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Kemp said:

Β 

You might recall that the committee said they HAD the proof months ago.

Obviously, they were lying, unless it's your contention that they're total morons.

At least it's finally good to hear you say that the heading of this thread remains unproven, at best, an outright lie, at worst.

Now, Deek will pivot because he knows I'm being accurate and what else can he or the other Trumpers do, besides pivot?

I admit that this is kinda fun for me.

You’re a partisan hack. They have all they need, but the burden of proof is, or should be, very high when you’re going to accuse the President of high crimes. (Of course Adam Schiff put an end to that.) Now with that said…I am NOT a partisan hack. I question everything all of these political actors do, on both sides of the aisle. Can you say the same?

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 3
  • Haha (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
26 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

You’re a partisan hack. They have all they need, but the burden of proof is, or should be, very high when you’re going to accuse the President of high crimes. (Of course Adam Schiff put an end to that.) Now with that said…I am NOT a partisan hack. I question everything all of these political actors do, on both sides of the aisle. Can you say the same?

They’re useful idiots. Poor simps don’t know any better.

  • Agree 2
Posted
3 hours ago, SoCal Deek said:

You’re a partisan hack. They have all they need, but the burden of proof is, or should be, very high when you’re going to accuse the President of high crimes. (Of course Adam Schiff put an end to that.) Now with that said…I am NOT a partisan hack. I question everything all of these political actors do, on both sides of the aisle. Can you say the same?

Β 

And still Deek avoids the point.

The weak can never take on a question directly.

As of now, there is absolutely zero proof of the allegation that Joe Biden took a bribe.

No wonder Deek is getting so frustrated.

Deek is weak.

Posted
3 hours ago, SoCal Deek said:

You’re a partisan hack. They have all they need, but the burden of proof is, or should be, very high when you’re going to accuse the President of high crimes. (Of course Adam Schiff put an end to that.) Now with that said…I am NOT a partisan hack. I question everything all of these political actors do, on both sides of the aisle. Can you say the same?

Why do all you cons pretend to be someone you're not. Β Are you embarrassed to be linked to MAGA's? Β I know I would be.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, Kemp said:

And still Deek avoids the point.

The weak can never take on a question directly.

As of now, there is absolutely zero proof of the allegation that Joe Biden took a bribe.

No wonder Deek is getting so frustrated.

Deek is weak.

Β 

So what?Β  They'll just "Russian collusion" it and "phone call" impeach him.

Posted
3 hours ago, Doc said:

Β 

Yeah, well, except that...


I honestly have a hard time understanding why anyone still believes this is evidence that Biden was trying to help Hunter.Β 
Β 

All of the public evidence goes against it and firing Shokin meant it was *more* likely that Burisma would face investigations.Β 
Β 

It’s just willful ignorance at this point.Β 

  • Haha (+1) 3
×
×
  • Create New...