Kemp Posted August 13, 2023 Posted August 13, 2023 On page 96, still no evidence of Joe Biden taking a bribe. Enjoy.
SoCal Deek Posted August 13, 2023 Posted August 13, 2023 11 minutes ago, Kemp said: On page 96, still no evidence of Joe Biden taking a bribe. Enjoy. You guys screamed for years to see Trumpβs tax returns. How about the Bidenβs volunteering to show us their bank records? Thatβd put an end to all of this.Β 3
Joe Ferguson forever Posted August 13, 2023 Posted August 13, 2023 14 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: You guys screamed for years to see Trumpβs tax returns. How about the Bidenβs volunteering to show us their bank records? Thatβd put an end to all of this.Β what about if it snows in June in FloridaΒ
SoCal Deek Posted August 13, 2023 Posted August 13, 2023 12 minutes ago, redtail hawk said: what about if it snows in June in FloridaΒ Donβt you have a high stakes exam to study for? π³ 1
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted August 13, 2023 Posted August 13, 2023 25 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: You guys screamed for years to see Trumpβs tax returns. How about the Bidenβs volunteering to show us their bank records? Thatβd put an end to all of this.Β Would it? Β This scenario involves the leader of the free world. Β We would need a deep dive into every aspect of his and the good doctorβs financial records, by an organization capable to that sort of forensic investigation.Β Β What youβre suggesting would be a great place to start, and JB certainly has nothing to fear by providing all these records if heβs clean. Β Β This is why itβs important to pursue Hunter aggressively. Β Perhaps if he faced real time in jail, he would consider exchanging information for a reduced sentence. Β If thereβs nothing to share, no harm or foul. Β Β
SoCal Deek Posted August 13, 2023 Posted August 13, 2023 4 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: Would it? Β This scenario involves the leader of the free world. Β We would need a deep dive into every aspect of his and the good doctorβs financial records, by an organization capable to that sort of forensic investigation.Β Β What youβre suggesting would be a great place to start, and JB certainly has nothing to fear by providing all these records if heβs clean. Β Β This is why itβs important to pursue Hunter aggressively. Β Perhaps if he faced real time in jail, he would consider exchanging information for a reduced sentence. Β If thereβs nothing to share, no harm or foul. Β Β It should, if anyone actually wanted to put an end to all of this outright corruption. But they donβt. They just want to score ridiculous political points. Looking into Joe Bidenβs personal finances is simply not that difficult.Β 2
ChiGoose Posted August 13, 2023 Posted August 13, 2023 5 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: It should, if anyone actually wanted to put an end to all of this outright corruption. But they donβt. They just want to score ridiculous political points. Looking into Joe Bidenβs personal finances is simply not that difficult.Β Isnβt the House investigating this? They can subpoena Bidenβs financial records. They even have a very recent SCOTUS decision that gives them ammo to do so.Β 1
SoCal Deek Posted August 13, 2023 Posted August 13, 2023 47 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: Isnβt the House investigating this? They can subpoena Bidenβs financial records. They even have a very recent SCOTUS decision that gives them ammo to do so.Β And they should.Β 1
Kemp Posted August 13, 2023 Posted August 13, 2023 1 hour ago, SoCal Deek said: You guys screamed for years to see Trumpβs tax returns. How about the Bidenβs volunteering to show us their bank records? Thatβd put an end to all of this.Β Β You might recall that the committee said they HAD the proof months ago. Obviously, they were lying, unless it's your contention that they're total morons. At least it's finally good to hear you say that the heading of this thread remains unproven, at best, an outright lie, at worst. Now, Deek will pivot because he knows I'm being accurate and what else can he or the other Trumpers do, besides pivot? I admit that this is kinda fun for me. 1
SoCal Deek Posted August 13, 2023 Posted August 13, 2023 9 minutes ago, Kemp said: Β You might recall that the committee said they HAD the proof months ago. Obviously, they were lying, unless it's your contention that they're total morons. At least it's finally good to hear you say that the heading of this thread remains unproven, at best, an outright lie, at worst. Now, Deek will pivot because he knows I'm being accurate and what else can he or the other Trumpers do, besides pivot? I admit that this is kinda fun for me. Youβre a partisan hack. They have all they need, but the burden of proof is, or should be, very high when youβre going to accuse the President of high crimes. (Of course Adam Schiff put an end to that.) Now with that saidβ¦I am NOT a partisan hack. I question everything all of these political actors do, on both sides of the aisle. Can you say the same? 2 3 3 1
Westside Posted August 13, 2023 Posted August 13, 2023 26 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: Youβre a partisan hack. They have all they need, but the burden of proof is, or should be, very high when youβre going to accuse the President of high crimes. (Of course Adam Schiff put an end to that.) Now with that saidβ¦I am NOT a partisan hack. I question everything all of these political actors do, on both sides of the aisle. Can you say the same? Theyβre useful idiots. Poor simps donβt know any better. 2
Doc Posted August 13, 2023 Posted August 13, 2023 3 hours ago, Unforgiven said: Oldie but goodie Β Yeah, well, except that...
Kemp Posted August 13, 2023 Posted August 13, 2023 3 hours ago, SoCal Deek said: Youβre a partisan hack. They have all they need, but the burden of proof is, or should be, very high when youβre going to accuse the President of high crimes. (Of course Adam Schiff put an end to that.) Now with that saidβ¦I am NOT a partisan hack. I question everything all of these political actors do, on both sides of the aisle. Can you say the same? Β And still Deek avoids the point. The weak can never take on a question directly. As of now, there is absolutely zero proof of the allegation that Joe Biden took a bribe. No wonder Deek is getting so frustrated. Deek is weak.
Joe Ferguson forever Posted August 13, 2023 Posted August 13, 2023 3 hours ago, SoCal Deek said: Youβre a partisan hack. They have all they need, but the burden of proof is, or should be, very high when youβre going to accuse the President of high crimes. (Of course Adam Schiff put an end to that.) Now with that saidβ¦I am NOT a partisan hack. I question everything all of these political actors do, on both sides of the aisle. Can you say the same? Why do all you cons pretend to be someone you're not. Β Are you embarrassed to be linked to MAGA's? Β I know I would be. 1
reddogblitz Posted August 13, 2023 Posted August 13, 2023 5 hours ago, redtail hawk said: what about if it snows in June in FloridaΒ Β Global.warming.
Joe Ferguson forever Posted August 13, 2023 Posted August 13, 2023 4 minutes ago, reddogblitz said: Β Global.warming. duh
Doc Posted August 13, 2023 Posted August 13, 2023 18 minutes ago, Kemp said: And still Deek avoids the point. The weak can never take on a question directly. As of now, there is absolutely zero proof of the allegation that Joe Biden took a bribe. No wonder Deek is getting so frustrated. Deek is weak. Β So what?Β They'll just "Russian collusion" it and "phone call" impeach him.
ChiGoose Posted August 13, 2023 Posted August 13, 2023 3 hours ago, Doc said: Β Yeah, well, except that... I honestly have a hard time understanding why anyone still believes this is evidence that Biden was trying to help Hunter.Β Β All of the public evidence goes against it and firing Shokin meant it was *more* likely that Burisma would face investigations.Β Β Itβs just willful ignorance at this point.Β 3
Recommended Posts