Westside Posted July 28, 2023 Posted July 28, 2023 48 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: What a total POS family. How can anyone defend these criminals? 1
BillsFanNC Posted July 28, 2023 Author Posted July 28, 2023 (edited) 8 hours ago, Big Blitz said: It's all one big hoax. Hunter didn't say anything about having to give his father Joe half his salary. Joe Biden isn't on tape admitting that he leveraged holding up US loan guarantees in order to get a prosecutor fired who was investigating the very same company where his unqualified son sat on the board at a healthy $80k per month salary. Biden family business partners haven't publicly stated that Joe Biden is indeed the big guy who is to recieve 10% of his sons foreign payments. None of these things are true. They aren't and can't be true even when there are documents and videos that show, without doubt, that they are true. Edited July 28, 2023 by BillsFanNC 1
Doc Posted July 28, 2023 Posted July 28, 2023 9 hours ago, Westside said: What a total POS family. How can anyone defend these criminals? Because Trump sent mean tweets. 1
BillsFanNC Posted July 28, 2023 Author Posted July 28, 2023 9 hours ago, Westside said: What a total POS family. How can anyone defend these criminals? Useful idiots. They defend them because their masters demand that they do so.
SoCal Deek Posted July 28, 2023 Posted July 28, 2023 9 hours ago, Westside said: What a total POS family. How can anyone defend these criminals? Simple! You have to break some eggs to fundamentally transform an entire country. So if a few crooked politicians get rich in the meantime, that’s a small price to pay on the road to universal healthcare and a massive redistribution of wealth. 1
BillsFanNC Posted July 30, 2023 Author Posted July 30, 2023 But, but it's all.... rUsSiAN diSiNForMatIoN!! 1
John from Riverside Posted July 30, 2023 Posted July 30, 2023 Still not a damn thing that incriminate Joe Biden 1
All_Pro_Bills Posted July 30, 2023 Posted July 30, 2023 9 minutes ago, John from Riverside said: Still not a damn thing that incriminate Joe Biden The Comer committee is going to bundle their findings into criminal referrals. Not make any grand public statements. If we use Trump-like criteria to assess "evidence" they'd all have been tried and convicted months ago. What's really missing is any clear understanding of who is the "brains" of their racket. We can cross off Hunter's name and play process of elimination to identify the most likely suspect. 1
BillStime Posted July 30, 2023 Posted July 30, 2023 8 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said: The Comer committee is going to bundle their findings into criminal referrals 3 hours ago, BillsFanNC said: But, but it's all.... rUsSiAN diSiNForMatIoN!! 🎯
John from Riverside Posted July 30, 2023 Posted July 30, 2023 39 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said: The Comer committee is going to bundle their findings into criminal referrals. Not make any grand public statements. If we use Trump-like criteria to assess "evidence" they'd all have been tried and convicted months ago. What's really missing is any clear understanding of who is the "brains" of their racket. We can cross off Hunter's name and play process of elimination to identify the most likely suspect. If they had some thing, they would be putting it out there because they have been flailing and look horrible They got nothing 13 hours ago, BillsFanNC said: Is it free-speech wonderful these people are allowed to say things that are not true with no recourse Yay, freedom
All_Pro_Bills Posted July 30, 2023 Posted July 30, 2023 (edited) 5 hours ago, John from Riverside said: If they had some thing, they would be putting it out there because they have been flailing and look horrible Why would they put it out there? In the middle of 2023 15 months away from the election. Strategically that makes no sense. You'll get greater impact closer to the 2024 election. Let the Democrats make the first move. Which is decide to run Joe, or not. My guess is not and most likely they'll run Newsome while dressing him up as some moderate rather than a raging leftist aristocrat. Also, Joe and Jill filed 2017 tax return totally over over $9 million of income. Can anyone rationalize what source, or service, or product the Biden's provided to account for that income? About 35 times thier 2026 filing. You're not the least bit suspicious? As the bribe money trail lines up well timing-wise. Are we to believe all these whistle blowers, former business associates, foreign actors, bank transaction records and suspicious activity reports to authorities are involved in some grand conspiracy hatched by Russian intelligence? This theory from the very people that habitually mock believers of such things. But of course, trust them here and ignore the fact that protecting Biden has been demonstrated to be a clear vital interest of these folks. So lying and deception are required. On top of all this, can it get any more obvious the leadership at DOJ and FBI along with the permanent Washington beauracracy are running a massive protection racket? If it was you or me our ass would be in the slammer already. It's counter to your interests as a citizen to support these crooks. What hits me the most here is how people let themselves get hoodwinked by these grifters. Edited July 30, 2023 by All_Pro_Bills 1
John from Riverside Posted July 30, 2023 Posted July 30, 2023 1 hour ago, All_Pro_Bills said: Why would they put it out there? In the middle of 2023 15 months away from the election. Strategically that makes no sense. You'll get greater impact closer to the 2024 election. Let the Democrats make the first move. Which is decide to run Joe, or not. My guess is not and most likely they'll run Newsome while dressing him up as some moderate rather than a raging leftist aristocrat. Also, Joe and Jill filed 2017 tax return totally over over $9 million of income. Can anyone rationalize what source, or service, or product the Biden's provided to account for that income? About 35 times thier 2026 filing. You're not the least bit suspicious? As the bribe money trail lines up well timing-wise. Are we to believe all these whistle blowers, former business associates, foreign actors, bank transaction records and suspicious activity reports to authorities are involved in some grand conspiracy hatched by Russian intelligence? This theory from the very people that habitually mock believers of such things. But of course, trust them here and ignore the fact that protecting Biden has been demonstrated to be a clear vital interest of these folks. So lying and deception are required. On top of all this, can it get any more obvious the leadership at DOJ and FBI along with the permanent Washington beauracracy are running a massive protection racket? If it was you or me our ass would be in the slammer already. It's counter to your interests as a citizen to support these crooks. What hits me the most here is how people let themselves get hoodwinked by these grifters. All that you’re lacking is the actual proof Because it doesn’t exist
Buffarukus Posted July 30, 2023 Posted July 30, 2023 (edited) 1 hour ago, John from Riverside said: All that you’re lacking is the actual proof Because it doesn’t exist I guess it is dependent what you concider actual. If your looking for concrete prosecutable proof by " name your legitamate agency or reporter" your very rarely going to get that for the powerful. Your most likely just going to get a scratch of the surface and a well timed "resignation' as a finality. There is a reason basically none of them face prosecution yet we all know their is rampant corruption. Seems as trump is repeatedly the only one who is facing true reprocussions. that in itself should tell you SOMETHING other then he is the ONLY politician worthy of facing deep investigation and judgment. To many here it tells them he is the ONLY one guilty of crimes. Sure. Edited July 30, 2023 by Buffarukus 2
All_Pro_Bills Posted July 30, 2023 Posted July 30, 2023 1 hour ago, John from Riverside said: All that you’re lacking is the actual proof Because it doesn’t exist Well, I'd suggest we examine the process of investigating a crime. What is most common is the investigators, detectives, officers, prosecutors, and others don't generally have "proof" that connects a specific suspect to the crime when the investigation is at the beginning. There is suspicion and an effort to gather evidence which will identify a suspect and place them at the scene of the crime. As events go forward the case becomes stronger (or could be dropped) and might reveal enough evidence to result in an arrest and an indictment. I assume your definition of proof is being in the process of presenting testimony and evidence to a court with prosecution, defense, judge, and jury. My expectation is we're getting there. Otherwise, I'm not in personal possession of "proof" as I'm not an investigator looking into the affairs of the Biden family. Or member of Congress or staff that has direct control of evidence. And I wasn't personally involved in any business dealings with Hunter, his business partners, the parties extending payments to him, or a party to any conversations. But I do believe anyone with good critical thinking and reasoning skills and a high level of objective thinking will conclude there's something to this story. I do follow along with the story. I listen to and read the testimony of witnesses, understand the activities of the committee gathering information, evidence, and data like bank transaction records, the identify of shell companies, and other artifacts. I understand the process of payments and transactions that are typically employed in money laundering schemes and how what is said to have been gathered about of transactions related to Biden family are consistent with the laundering process. I also believe I have a good understanding of what is customarily legal and what might be illegal. And following along with the story, events, statements, and activities of the House committee, the whistle blowers that have come forward, and statements from business partners, and foreign officials involved in the alleged payments I conclude its highly likely they're running a bribery and extortion operation. How else to explain a lavish lifestyle absent any employment or income sources that would generate the funds to support it?. Large amounts of income unaccounted for from legitimately understood sources. What else is there but to conclude the Biden's have been receiving income from illegal activities which in this case is an influence peddling and bribery operation. These allegations of receiving millions in payments from foreign officials in exchange for political favors is as real as it gets. What I'm beginning to come around to is the revelation that these kinds of scams and operations are more common than not in Washington. 2
BillsFanNC Posted July 30, 2023 Author Posted July 30, 2023 As of this moment there's 1000000x more solid "proof" that Joe Biden is a corrupt foreign agent who collected millions from foreign adversaries around the world via his bag man son Hunter... Than there is or was about Trump colluding with Russia to steal the 2016 election. The Biden situation is a raging Canadian forest fire spewing smoke over the continent. The Trump situation was a never ending series of attempts to start a fire with wet flint and kindling. 1
Doc Posted July 30, 2023 Posted July 30, 2023 There's more there to at least impeach Joke than there was to impeach Trump. There won't be any indictments because he's POTUS and by the time he leaves office it won't be worth it given his declining state.
Recommended Posts