Jump to content

๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Biden's Corruption: $20M+ bribes. All the evidence that isn't evidence.


Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, SoCal Deek said:

So you agree that any potential โ€˜security problemโ€™ was therefore remedied when they physically retrieved the documents (as it was with Clinton, Biden, and Pence) and the discussion regarding the unique dispute can then continue by constitutional scholars. The indictment is purely political at that point.ย 

There are still missing documents
The only reason why they were able to retrieve them is because they raided his place

Not exactly what I would call turning them in

Posted
1 minute ago, John from Riverside said:

Youโ€™re just not gonna let that go are you ๐Ÿค“

To be honest, that was a horrible take. I know you took it back, but the fact that you actually believed it says a lot.

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

Youโ€™re just not gonna let that go are you ๐Ÿค“

It was an outrageously absurd claim that had zero point to it and you repeated it more than once. It goes in the Hall of Fame of ridiculousness. Sorry.ย 
ย 

Powerline is operated by some well-respected conservative attorneys. Why donโ€™t you consider broadening your horizons and then come back and tell us what you disagree with from their writings. It will make you appear to be marginally independent and less Tiberius-ish.ย 

Edited by JDHillFan
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

It was an outrageously absurd claim that had zero point to it and you repeated it more than once. It goes in the Hall of Fame of ridiculousness. Sorry.ย 
ย 

Powerline is operated by some well-respected conservative attorneys. Why donโ€™t you consider broadening your horizons and then come back and tell us what you disagree with from their writings. It will make you appear to be marginally independent and less Tiberius-ish.ย 

After seeing powerline's writer Hinderaker (weirdly misspelled in some secondhand quote here) mentioned -- yes, he is a retired attorney who had a very respectable career and a sideline as a blogger.

He would have been characterized (perhaps unfairly?) as a "Country Club Republican" back in the day. But like so many of that type, he gave up and gave in and learned to love the Trump Party.

Posted
3 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

After seeing powerline's writer Hinderaker (weirdly misspelled in some secondhand quote here) mentioned -- yes, he is a retired attorney who had a very respectable career and a sideline as a blogger.

He would have been characterized (perhaps unfairly?) as a "Country Club Republican" back in the day. But like so many of that type, he gave up and gave in and learned to love the Trump Party.

Which of his writings do you take exception to?

Posted
3 hours ago, John from Riverside said:

There are still missing documents
The only reason why they were able to retrieve them is because they raided his place

Not exactly what I would call turning them in

Geez Johnโ€ฆ.what I said was that the government already remedied the dispute by getting the documents back. Thereโ€™s literally no need to go the extra step and indict your political rival. You cannot possibly be this partisan!ย 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Westside said:

But the โ€œbig guyโ€ doesnโ€™t know anything about that. Weโ€™re dealing with intellectually dishonest people on this board.ย 


Where did they find the term Big Guy?

Posted

ย 

ย 

4 hours ago, John from Riverside said:

ย 

Who the ***** is powerline? Are they so right wing that I havenโ€™t even heard of them

ย 

ย 

ย 

4 hours ago, John from Riverside said:

Itโ€™s not reliable

ย 

ย 

Which is it John ?

ย 

ย 

ย 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

๐Ÿ‘†๐Ÿคกย 

ย 

Karen Psyop probably doesnโ€™t remember that the GOP tried to spin Devon Archer during Trumpโ€™s first impeachment.

ย 


You think Trumpโ€™s DOJ already didnโ€™t exhaust this?

ย 

image.thumb.jpeg.39dbb07dda00f90450cf6398662c6a00.jpeg

Posted

The very same questions that @ChiGooseย so easily dismisses with his strict adherence to logic...

ย 

:lol:

ย 

The King of Kings!

ย 

Why did Joe Biden previously say he'd never spoken to his "son about his business," but now you're saying Joe was never IN BUSINESS with Hunter? Big difference KJP!

ย 

Why is Devon Archer testifying that in at least a dozen instances, Hunter put his then-VP father on the phone with his overseas associates. ย 

ย 

Why does the FD-1023 form allege that Burisma owner Mykola Zlochevsky bribed the Bidens with $10 million?

ย 

Why does Zlochevsky claim he has 17 phone recordings of Joe and Hunter Biden?

ย 

Why did Victor Shokin get fired while investigating Burisma and after he'd already seized 4 houses in Kyiv, 2 plots of land and a Rolls-Royce all belonging to Zlochevsky?

ย 

Why is there a text message from Hunter saying, โ€œI am sitting here with my father and WE would like to understand why the commitment made has not been fulfilled"?

ย 

Why did two Burisma executives explicitly ask Hunter, โ€œCan you ring your dad?โ€

ย 

Why do multiple witnesses now say that the "Big Guy" is in fact Joe Biden?ย 

ย 

Why did up to 9 Biden family members receive funds from overseas deals?ย 

ย 

Why did the Bidens set up a web of multiple bank accounts and 20+ LLCs to conceal funding sources and then funnel that $$ to Biden family members?

ย 

Why did the Bidens conveniently have business deals in Kazakhstan, Ukraine, Romania, Russia, and Chinaโ€”all countries overseen by then-VP Joe Biden?

ย 

Why did Ukrainian oligarchs and CCP aligned energy firms pay the Bidens money if they had zero skills other than proximity to power?

ย 

ย 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
59 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

The very same questions that @ChiGooseย so easily dismisses with his strict adherence to logic...

ย 

:lol:

ย 

The King of Kings!

ย 

Why did Joe Biden previously say he'd never spoken to his "son about his business," but now you're saying Joe was never IN BUSINESS with Hunter? Big difference KJP!

ย 

Why is Devon Archer testifying that in at least a dozen instances, Hunter put his then-VP father on the phone with his overseas associates. ย 

ย 

Why does the FD-1023 form allege that Burisma owner Mykola Zlochevsky bribed the Bidens with $10 million?

ย 

Why does Zlochevsky claim he has 17 phone recordings of Joe and Hunter Biden?

ย 

Why did Victor Shokin get fired while investigating Burisma and after he'd already seized 4 houses in Kyiv, 2 plots of land and a Rolls-Royce all belonging to Zlochevsky?

ย 

Why is there a text message from Hunter saying, โ€œI am sitting here with my father and WE would like to understand why the commitment made has not been fulfilled"?

ย 

Why did two Burisma executives explicitly ask Hunter, โ€œCan you ring your dad?โ€

ย 

Why do multiple witnesses now say that the "Big Guy" is in fact Joe Biden?ย 

ย 

Why did up to 9 Biden family members receive funds from overseas deals?ย 

ย 

Why did the Bidens set up a web of multiple bank accounts and 20+ LLCs to conceal funding sources and then funnel that $$ to Biden family members?

ย 

Why did the Bidens conveniently have business deals in Kazakhstan, Ukraine, Romania, Russia, and Chinaโ€”all countries overseen by then-VP Joe Biden?

ย 

Why did Ukrainian oligarchs and CCP aligned energy firms pay the Bidens money if they had zero skills other than proximity to power?

ย 

ย 


And againย itโ€™s telling that Shokin, who was fired for allegedly being corrupt and not prosecuting corruption, was never charged with corruption. And neither was anyone else for that matter, despite him allegedly protecting people. ย Merely firing him was enough for people to say โ€œheโ€™s corrupt, but weโ€™re goodโ€? ย 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, BillStime said:


Well, as far as I know youโ€™re not @Westsideย but youโ€™re welcome to answer it for him.

You seem to have a VERY ODD understanding of what a message board is. Please tell us youโ€™re aware that youโ€™re not having private conversations with people here. And if your self proclaimed goal is to be ignored on a message board, the easiest way to accomplish it is to leave.ย 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, Doc said:


And againย itโ€™s telling that Shokin, who was fired for allegedly being corrupt and not prosecuting corruption, was never charged with corruption. And neither was anyone else for that matter, despite him allegedly protecting people. ย Merely firing him was enough for people to say โ€œheโ€™s corrupt, but weโ€™re goodโ€? ย 

No, but it was the required first step if they had any hopes of joining NATO. NATO wanted the guy gone because he was a Putin puppet.

ย 

And whaddya know, a few short years later theyโ€™re joining NATO. Looks like the decision turned out to be the right one for the future ย of Ukraine.

ย 

ย 

Edited by Governor
  • Haha (+1) 3
×
×
  • Create New...