All_Pro_Bills Posted June 16, 2023 Posted June 16, 2023 4 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: What? Russians paying Hunter? The committee wants Archer to provide information about his transactions with Russian billionaire Elena Baturina, who sent a $3.5 million payment to a company linked to Archer and Hunter Biden. Joe Biden knows NOTHING about his son's business dealings. Archer met with Mr. Biden in the White House in April 2014, just a few days before the vice president was dispatched to Ukraine to offer U.S. assistance with energy production and other economic aid. Shortly after Mr. Biden’s Ukraine trip, Archer was hired to the board of Burisma, a Ukrainian energy company. Hunter Biden was named to the Burisma board just a few weeks later. Dare I ask. Why isn't the DOJ/FBI asking the same questions? Instead Garland is doing his best Sgt. Schultz imitation. I love this guy's work. Today he names the names and connects the dots. Doing what an extinct creature that once roamed the news rooms of the national media used to do when professionalism and getting the story ruled the business. Something called investigative journalism. https://kunstler.com/cluster*****-nation/call-the-exorcists/ 2
John from Riverside Posted June 16, 2023 Posted June 16, 2023 All these accusations absolutely no proof
All_Pro_Bills Posted June 16, 2023 Posted June 16, 2023 1 hour ago, John from Riverside said: All these accusations absolutely no proof That depends on your definition of proof. Should statements by House Oversight committee chairman James Comer that he concludes evidence exists that some $20 to $30 million in illegal payments have been made to Biden & family be dismissed? Or should we be curious and pay closer attention? Witnesses with firsthand involvement, recordings of conversations, records of bank transactions and fund transfers. That's what they're gathering. What we should be asking is we're is the DOJ and the standard crying about national security concerns? Sadly and more specific, those thing remain conditional based on who is being scrutinized. 1
BillsFanNC Posted June 16, 2023 Author Posted June 16, 2023 Something tells me @John from Riverside hung on every word of what the sham partisan j6 committee told him was true....and that was surely more than enough evidence for him.
Pokebball Posted June 16, 2023 Posted June 16, 2023 2 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said: That depends on your definition of proof. Should statements by House Oversight committee chairman James Comer that he concludes evidence exists that some $20 to $30 million in illegal payments have been made to Biden & family be dismissed? Or should we be curious and pay closer attention? Witnesses with firsthand involvement, recordings of conversations, records of bank transactions and fund transfers. That's what they're gathering. What we should be asking is we're is the DOJ and the standard crying about national security concerns? Sadly and more specific, those thing remain conditional based on who is being scrutinized. There's a reason the DOJ and FBI have stonewalled on releasing documents. There's a reason they redacted info from documents they did release. The only ones that know what those reasons are are the DOJ and FBI. No one should be surprised that folks on both sides of the aisle are concluding in ways that best serve their agendas. This coming at a time where many Americans are losing trust in these two institutions. It's most unfortunate. 1
Doc Posted June 16, 2023 Posted June 16, 2023 Considering Trump's impeachment over the phone call, there's more than enough to impeach Biden even without evidence of bribery.
The Frankish Reich Posted June 17, 2023 Posted June 17, 2023 2 hours ago, All_Pro_Bills said: Should statements by House Oversight committee chairman James Comer that he concludes evidence exists that some $20 to $30 million in illegal payments have been made to Biden & family be dismissed? He chairs the committee. The Republicans control the House. They promised hearings. Let's have a hearing! Put up or shut up. 1
Wacka Posted June 17, 2023 Posted June 17, 2023 (edited) No proof of bribes. Saw on twitter today that ther are emails on Hunter's laptop from the CEO of Burisma setting up a Maltese account that had $10 mil deposited in it. Edited June 17, 2023 by Wacka 1
John from Riverside Posted June 17, 2023 Posted June 17, 2023 3 hours ago, BillsFanNC said: Something tells me @John from Riverside hung on every word of what the sham partisan j6 committee told him was true....and that was surely more than enough evidence for him. Only what the video actually showed and what people actually testified to I would’ve liked to of seen a couple of Republicans on the committee. The problem is the republican party only wanted to put people under investigation on the committee. They could’ve easily put a couple of Republicans that would not have been objected to. 2 minutes ago, B-Man said: Republicans love their memes Actual evidence be damned 3 hours ago, All_Pro_Bills said: That depends on your definition of proof. Should statements by House Oversight committee chairman James Comer that he concludes evidence exists that some $20 to $30 million in illegal payments have been made to Biden & family be dismissed? Or should we be curious and pay closer attention? Witnesses with firsthand involvement, recordings of conversations, records of bank transactions and fund transfers. That's what they're gathering. What we should be asking is we're is the DOJ and the standard crying about national security concerns? Sadly and more specific, those thing remain conditional based on who is being scrutinized. My definition of proof is proof Nothing has been presented just a lot of accusations wouldn’t go to court with this unless you wanted to get laughed at
aristocrat Posted June 17, 2023 Posted June 17, 2023 Here’s the problem. Triune was not part of the political lifer club that all the other pols want to be part of. They won’t go after joe cause they want their 20 million. If you think joe didn’t take bribes you’re an idiot. If you think the republicans don’t take bribes you’re an idiot. But the left claiming they’re not taking money is hilarious to hear 1
BillsFanNC Posted June 17, 2023 Author Posted June 17, 2023 (edited) The question that both the Bidens and their pathetic leftist sycophants STILL ignore and can't answer... What products or services does the Biden family business provide? We know through bank records that several Biden family members have received foreign funds through a labyrinth of LLCs and foreign shell companies. To be paid in that fashion all by itself is suspect, but it's extremely suspect when you have no business service that you can point to that you provided in exchange for those millions. Edited June 17, 2023 by BillsFanNC 1
Governor Posted June 17, 2023 Posted June 17, 2023 (edited) 6 hours ago, John from Riverside said: All these accusations absolutely no proof Their own members are quietly telling people here that there’s nothing there, but they’re 3 years down the rabbit hole and refuse to believe it. They want an “alternative” investigation running alongside Trump’s trials so incredibly badly even if none of it is true. It no longer matters what the story is as long as there’s an investigation. They’re about to lose the House back, a few senate seats, and the presidential, so it really is their last desperate attempt for power. The party is already a rotting corpse and they refuse to change the platform to make themselves electable in the future. “It is what it is” as they say. https://www.thedailybeast.com/republicans-admit-they-dont-know-if-biden-bribery-tapes-really-exist Edited June 17, 2023 by Governor 1 1
SoCal Deek Posted June 17, 2023 Posted June 17, 2023 The Biden case seems simple to me. The US Constitution does NOT say that impeachment is based on the President accepting a bribe. It only lists bribery as an impeachable offense. So in what universe is Biden purposefully and specifically withholding $1 billion of US taxpayer money for the benefit of his own family not a bribe?
BillsFanNC Posted June 17, 2023 Author Posted June 17, 2023 5 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: The Biden case seems simple to me. The US Constitution does NOT say that impeachment is based on the President accepting a bribe. It only lists bribery as an impeachable offense. So in what universe is Biden purposefully and specifically withholding $1 billion of US taxpayer money for the benefit of his own family not a bribe? The universe of the left where allegations are perpetually allegations and can never be bolstered by mounting evidence, let alone proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Also in this world, words mean different things on any given day. Therefore Biden didn't do anything wrong.
BillsFanNC Posted June 18, 2023 Author Posted June 18, 2023 They're just allegations. No smoke at all. 1 1
Wacka Posted June 18, 2023 Posted June 18, 2023 (edited) "The stuff that dreams are made of." Edited June 18, 2023 by Wacka
Recommended Posts