Biden is Mentally Fit Posted October 10, 2023 Posted October 10, 2023 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Tommy Callahan said: Dang. Biden was interviewed by the special council. Β https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2023/10/09/president-joe-biden-classified-documents-special-counsel-robert-hur/71125258007/ Β Β They are just trying to figure out which low-level aide made all this classified info spillage happen to Biden. I would not want to be that person! Edited October 10, 2023 by JDHillFan Spelling 1 1
All_Pro_Bills Posted October 10, 2023 Posted October 10, 2023 13 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: They are just trying to figure out which low-level aide made all this classified info spillage happen to Biden. I would not want to be that person! Kill the messenger!Β I've learned that In almost all situations in life whether personal or professional its a good idea to avoid being the messenger. 2 1
Doc Posted October 10, 2023 Posted October 10, 2023 "I didn't know they were there"...in my garage next to my car that I see every weekend.Β Β 2
B-Man Posted October 27, 2023 Posted October 27, 2023 Β Β Biden-appointed prosecutor ADMITS he declined to prosecute Hunter for tax crimes because he was 'short-staffed' Β by Kelly Laco Β California U.S. Attorney Martin Estrada confirmed claims by whistleblowers that he declined to prosecute Hunter Biden for tax crimesΒ Estrada told congressional investigators he didn't have enough lawyers to pursue the president's son A top Biden-appointed prosecutor verified whistleblower claims that he declined to prosecute Hunter Biden for tax crimes, but bizarrely blamed being 'resource-strapped' as the main reason behind his decision. DailyMail.com reviewed the transcript of a closed-door House Judiciary Committee interview with U.S. Attorney Martin Estrada for the Central District of California. Estrada's interview comes after IRS whistleblowers Gary Shapley and Joseph Ziegler testified under oath that Hunter Biden received 'special' treatment in the investigation into his financial dealings. Β https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12677775/Biden-appointed-prosecutor-ADMITS-declined-prosecute-Hunter-tax-crimes-short-staffed.html 1 2 1
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted October 31, 2023 Posted October 31, 2023 On 10/27/2023 at 12:26 PM, B-Man said: Β Β Biden-appointed prosecutor ADMITS he declined to prosecute Hunter for tax crimes because he was 'short-staffed' Β by Kelly Laco Β California U.S. Attorney Martin Estrada confirmed claims by whistleblowers that he declined to prosecute Hunter Biden for tax crimesΒ Estrada told congressional investigators he didn't have enough lawyers to pursue the president's son A top Biden-appointed prosecutor verified whistleblower claims that he declined to prosecute Hunter Biden for tax crimes, but bizarrely blamed being 'resource-strapped' as the main reason behind his decision. DailyMail.com reviewed the transcript of a closed-door House Judiciary Committee interview with U.S. Attorney Martin Estrada for the Central District of California. Estrada's interview comes after IRS whistleblowers Gary Shapley and Joseph Ziegler testified under oath that Hunter Biden received 'special' treatment in the investigation into his financial dealings. Β https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12677775/Biden-appointed-prosecutor-ADMITS-declined-prosecute-Hunter-tax-crimes-short-staffed.html βNo one is above the lawβ except those that are.Β 1 1 1
BillsFanNC Posted October 31, 2023 Author Posted October 31, 2023 (edited) Nonsense! Β Just ask the useful idiots here, the King in particular.Β They can hand wave their way around dozens of legitimate reasons why a sitting vice president is using pseudonyms to discuss his sons business that he never discussed with his son. Β Β Edited October 31, 2023 by BillsFanNC 2
Wacka Posted October 31, 2023 Posted October 31, 2023 15 hours ago, BillStime said: Β BS- nice picture of you and your harem, ...err sisters. 1
Doc Posted October 31, 2023 Posted October 31, 2023 5 hours ago, BillsFanNC said: Nonsense! Β Just ask the useful idiots here, the King in particular.Β They can hand wave their way around dozens of legitimate reasons why a sitting vice president is using pseudonyms to discuss his sons business that he never discussed with his son. Β Β Β Ron Mexico agrees. 2
BillsFanNC Posted November 1, 2023 Author Posted November 1, 2023 Remember that bank records that show a clear money trail isn't evidence! Β Β 2
BillsFanNC Posted November 1, 2023 Author Posted November 1, 2023 Funny that the "loan repayment" only became possible after receiving CCP money funneled through shell companies... Β Β 2
BillsFanNC Posted November 1, 2023 Author Posted November 1, 2023 King, JFR....... Bueller? Β π Β Β 2
BillsFanNC Posted November 1, 2023 Author Posted November 1, 2023 58 minutes ago, Doc said: The walls are closing... Β No they're not.Β Β The memo line on the canceled check didn't say: "bribe payment" or "10% for the big guy".... Β Therefore not evidence. Β Β 1 1
wnyguy Posted November 1, 2023 Posted November 1, 2023 If these are "loan repayments" it should be pretty easy to show the original "loan" transactions. Have they shown that somewhere? I may have missed it with all this war stuff going on. 1
Recommended Posts