John from Riverside Posted July 30, 2023 Posted July 30, 2023 1 hour ago, Buffarukus said: I guess it is dependent what you concider actual. If your looking for concrete prosecutable proof by " name your legitamate agency or reporter" your very rarely going to get that for the powerful. Your most likely just going to get a scratch of the surface and a well timed "resignation' as a finality. There is a reason basically none of them face prosecution yet we all know their is rampant corruption. Seems as trump is repeatedly the only one who is facing true reprocussions. that in itself should tell you SOMETHING other then he is the ONLY politician worthy of facing deep investigation and judgment. To many here it tells them he is the ONLY one guilty of crimes. Sure. Perhaps if Trump was directly involved in the crimes that he commits I’m talking about evidence that can be used in an actual trial to convict. It’s not there for Joe Biden. Did he take a bribe? No one really knows no one’s ever going to know because there is no evidence of it however, in a trial, you were presumed innocent until proven guilty 2
B-Man Posted July 30, 2023 Posted July 30, 2023 Comer Lays out Why Those 170 Biden Suspicious Activity Reports Are So Bad by Nick Arama The House Oversight Committee is accumulating a lot of evidence regarding Joe Biden and the Biden family’s foreign business dealings scandal. On Thursday, Chairman James Comer revealed that the IRS whistleblowers were indicating they had evidence of offshore accounts that could be related to Joe Biden. If they have the records of those accounts and can link Joe Biden to foreign payments, that may be the smoking gun right there if the Republicans get around to an impeachment trial. Our friends at Townhall pointed out how Comer laid out more information about the 170 “Suspicious Activity Reports” and how significant it was that there were 170 of them about the Bidens. .https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2023/07/28/comer-lays-out-why-those-170-biden-suspicious-activity-reports-are-so-bad-n783853
BillsFanNC Posted July 30, 2023 Author Posted July 30, 2023 (edited) In the interview with Cruz Comer stated he used to be a banking executive for 10 years. In those 10 years the bank he worked for issued "maybe two" suspicious activity reports. They are exceedingly rare. Furthermore, why would a bank want to draw attention to millions of dollars flowing through it unless absolutely necessary? More money is good for business at a bank, right? Now consider that there are 170. 170! SARs relating to the Bidens and their associates. And leftists will STILL tell you with a straight face that there's nothing to see here. Edited July 30, 2023 by BillsFanNC
Doc Posted July 30, 2023 Posted July 30, 2023 3 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: In the interview with Cruz Comer stated he used to be a banking executive for 10 years. In those 10 years the bank he worked for issued "maybe two" suspicious activity reports. They are exceedingly rare. Furthermore, why would a bank want to draw attention to millions of dollars flowing through it unless absolutely necessary? More money is good for business at a bank, right? Now consider that the are 170. 170! SARs relating to the Bidens and their associates. And leftists will STILL tell you with a straight face that there's nothing to see here. They pretty much have to at this point. But even they know, deep down, it's true.
B-Man Posted July 30, 2023 Posted July 30, 2023 10 minutes ago, John from Riverside said: Redstate.com, lol John, as I have explained frequently to Billstime and Tiberius. Adults don't accept that "I don't approve of your site" childishness" anymore. There are a world of news/opinion sources out there now, and they have proven to be just as, if not more, reliable than the mainstream media. There are usually links in each of these stories to their sources to validate their article You can continue your bias or try to learn more about the world outside your California cocoon. . 2
John from Riverside Posted July 30, 2023 Posted July 30, 2023 1 minute ago, B-Man said: John, as I have explained frequently to Billstime and Tiberius. Adults don't accept that "I don't approve of your site" childishness" anymore. There are a world of news/opinion sources out there now, and they have proven to be just as, if not more, reliable than the mainstream media. There are usually links in each of these stories to their sources to validate their article You can continue your bias or try to learn more about the world outside your California cocoon. . You’re seeking confirmation bias it’s nothing more than that. If you can’t find some thing from a neutral new station to post on here and continue to post right wing propaganda, no one is going to take you seriously except for other right wing propagandists sit in your echo chamber if you like
SoCal Deek Posted July 30, 2023 Posted July 30, 2023 27 minutes ago, John from Riverside said: Perhaps if Trump was directly involved in the crimes that he commits I’m talking about evidence that can be used in an actual trial to convict. It’s not there for Joe Biden. Did he take a bribe? No one really knows no one’s ever going to know because there is no evidence of it however, in a trial, you were presumed innocent until proven guilty Did he take a bribe? He ARRANGED for them!
John from Riverside Posted July 30, 2023 Posted July 30, 2023 14 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: In the interview with Cruz Comer stated he used to be a banking executive for 10 years. In those 10 years the bank he worked for issued "maybe two" suspicious activity reports. They are exceedingly rare. Furthermore, why would a bank want to draw attention to millions of dollars flowing through it unless absolutely necessary? More money is good for business at a bank, right? Now consider that there are 170. 170! SARs relating to the Bidens and their associates. And leftists will STILL tell you with a straight face that there's nothing to see here. It’s not evidence Just now, SoCal Deek said: Did he take a bribe? He ARRANGED for them! Prove it
All_Pro_Bills Posted July 30, 2023 Posted July 30, 2023 2 minutes ago, John from Riverside said: You’re seeking confirmation bias it’s nothing more than that. If you can’t find some thing from a neutral new station to post on here and continue to post right wing propaganda, no one is going to take you seriously except for other right wing propagandists sit in your echo chamber if you like While we can debate the reliability of sources, but the actual question is reliability of the information. Does the House Oversight Committee have records of suspicious bank transactions reported to the IRS and cited by the IRS whistle blowers that their investigations identified as suspect transactions involving funds that found their way into accounting belonging to the Biden's or not? https://oversight.house.gov/release/comer-probes-hunter-bidens-suspicious-foreign-business-transactions-flagged-by-u-s-banks/
John from Riverside Posted July 30, 2023 Posted July 30, 2023 2 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said: While we can debate the reliability of sources, but the actual question is reliability of the information. Does the House Oversight Committee have records of suspicious bank transactions reported to the IRS and cited by the IRS whistle blowers that their investigations identified as suspect transactions involving funds that found their way into accounting belonging to the Biden's or not? https://oversight.house.gov/release/comer-probes-hunter-bidens-suspicious-foreign-business-transactions-flagged-by-u-s-banks/ Well, now that would be an example of evidence Not somebody saying they have it, but actually having it
Buffarukus Posted July 30, 2023 Posted July 30, 2023 (edited) 1 hour ago, John from Riverside said: Perhaps if Trump was directly involved in the crimes that he commits I’m talking about evidence that can be used in an actual trial to convict. It’s not there for Joe Biden. Did he take a bribe? No one really knows no one’s ever going to know because there is no evidence of it however, in a trial, you were presumed innocent until proven guilty Thats exactly what im talking about. You think on the ground level your going to get that type of proof? If you did then explain to me which president had it verifiably up to your standard and did not face charges. Id argue every single one. But clinton had nothing going on with their shell charities. Barrack never illegally ordered drone strikes of civilians. Hillary never destroyed evidence in a investigation. Bush and his Iraq war was simply a mistake of intelligence. The banking sector commited no fraud in the crisis. Weres the proof? Just a propoderence of suggestions and info but no prosicutable concrete proof that you require. Its all legit. I mean, alot of these were "investigated" and "mistakes" were found, people were shuffled but no crimes commited? Right? Its how it works. Your world the DA found damning evidence for trumps top secret papers but nothing for biden. Thats the story. You see evidence in trump tampering in ukrain but biden..nothing to see. No proof. You have trump indicted, right before a campain for president but fbi just cant seem to reach a conclusion on "ongoing investigations" from 2019 and before. Very slow to prosecute. Lol If theres nothing to see then be transparent. Same way they were "unsure" the labtop was hunters. Same way they found "mistakes" in russiagate. Same story. Same way whoops! hunter was so close to accidently getting sweeping immunity for his sweetheart deal for crimes others are in a cell for years. Just a mistake. No proof the DA and defendents on the case are in bed trying to protect power. On and on. Edited July 30, 2023 by Buffarukus
snafu Posted July 30, 2023 Posted July 30, 2023 51 minutes ago, John from Riverside said: You’re seeking confirmation bias it’s nothing more than that. If you can’t find some thing from a neutral new station to post on here and continue to post right wing propaganda, no one is going to take you seriously except for other right wing propagandists sit in your echo chamber if you like Can you point me to a news station that’s generally accepted as being neutral? Just like people say that Redsatate.com is right wing propaganda, there’s about half the country who’d claim that NYTimes.com is the opposite. It is a real problem.
BillsFanNC Posted July 30, 2023 Author Posted July 30, 2023 This whole saga illustrates how the left has flipped standards on its head. 1. What IS supposed to happen is you investigate suspected crimes to lead to finding and charging, if appropriate, those responsible. This is what should be happening with the Biden family, but it's not. 2. What's NOT supposed to happen is exhaustively investigating people in search of crimes. This is what should not be happening to Trump, but it is. Leftists scream that #1 is wrong and without merit, while #2 is completely justified. This is because they live under a green sky in a clown world. 1
SoCal Deek Posted July 30, 2023 Posted July 30, 2023 The funny thing about evidence is that law enforcement finds exactly 0% of the evidence they were purposefully never looking for. 1
Doc Posted July 30, 2023 Posted July 30, 2023 33 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: The funny thing about evidence is that law enforcement finds exactly 0% of the evidence they were purposefully never looking for. Wayne Gretzky would be proud.
B-Man Posted July 31, 2023 Posted July 31, 2023 Hunter Biden investigation: Why the Devon Archer testimony is so important by Sarah Edford When Devon Archer sits down on Monday with the House Oversight Committee, the Hunter Biden investigation could enter a new and more significant phase. That’s because Archer, a former business partner of Hunter Biden’s and a former friend to the family, is expected to testify about the extent of President Joe Biden’s involvement in his son’s foreign business dealings, potentially roping the president more deeply into a scandal he has thus far studiously avoided. Archer will be the closest business associate of Hunter Biden’s to speak with Congress to date. The two served together on the board of Burisma, a Ukrainian energy company, and handled a range of other business deals together through Rosemont Seneca, their investment firm. While other witnesses have discussed the evidence that Hunter Biden engaged in illegal activity during his time working for overseas companies, Archer’s testimony could be the first that directly links Joe Biden to the lobbying his son did. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/house/hunter-biden-investigation-why-devon-archer-testimony-important . 1
SoCal Deek Posted July 31, 2023 Posted July 31, 2023 On 7/30/2023 at 9:24 AM, Doc said: Wayne Gretzky would be proud. I’ve gotta admit I don’t know what that means…but since he lives up the street from me, I guess I could go over ask him. 😉 1 1
Recommended Posts