Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, newcam2012 said:

I fully understand your point. Let me try to unbottle your mind. I  overreacted to the signing. I just saw headlines of 6 years 20 mil without knowing the details. My mistake. Several here have pointed justly made that point. Some nice and professional others not so much. 

 

As I've stated I don't hate the signing. My eyeball test as stated before doesn't see Miller as elite but 2021 statistics show that he is. So it's probably safer to say my eyes aren't seeing things accurately. However, stats can be deceiving.

 

It remains to be seen how good he will be as a Bill. 

 

Hope that helps 

The “eyeball test”….. so it’s safe to assume you didn’t watch him in the playoffs?  He was a savage all postseason.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, nucci said:

how is it fantastic? He admitted the dead cap hits are pure guess

 

I dunno about fantastic, but the some of the points are germaine about the difference between how a cap-rich team will structure a contract to hit heavily in the first year and perhaps evenly over 3 years, but how a cap-tight team will "roll the can down the road" to trade a low initial cap hit for the risk of the cap/performance ratio going out of whack in later years. 

 

I think the germaine point is that if the contract contains $45M guaranteed at signing, $51.5M guaranteed overall, it's not unreasonable to look at it as a 3 year, $51.5M contract ($17M/yr) where some of the cost is "kicked down the road" into the final years. 

 

Beane has shown himself good at managing this kind of risk, and our S&C staff has shown itself to be adept at keeping players healthy and productive (sprinkle in some luck and knock wood). 

 

As for "opportunity  cost", we have to consider that there's been "opportunity cost" in many of the contracts the Bills have had over the last several years, including Hughes, Addison, and Lotulelei.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
34 minutes ago, aristocrat said:

 

I mean the state just gave them a billion dollars so they can make more money off the team so this is the splash they wanted to distract us all from the new stadium. 

 

Yes, that's why they did this.  🙄

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, Scott7975 said:

Some Bills fans will be pissed off about anything.  Beane sucks, he has no big signings.  Beane sucks he over paid.  Big signings are usually over paid.  Contracts are also not always contracts.  Von Miller won't see 6 years.  Just sit back and relax. This team could have won a super bowl last year and they just got better.

Agree Scott. Reminds some people I know where I live. Always blame others but never about the positive helping or solution. Totally agree with Bills off season. Glad beane and McDermott are here.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted


I loved this bit about Miller from Rams reporter Jordan Rodrigue in The Athletic today:

 

https://theathletic.com/3191131/2022/03/17/von-miller-joins-the-bills-what-will-he-bring-to-buffalo-and-what-do-the-rams-do-now/?source=twitterhq

 

It’s an interesting thing to compare the acquisition of Miller by either of these teams, at the time they did. When the Rams traded for Miller in November, they did so knowing they were contenders who needed to get a little extra “oomph” in their outside pass rush, especially with the way coaches were scheming double- and triple-teams against Aaron Donald and chipping against Leonard Floyd.

 

That worked out for the Rams, and then some. Miller’s presence allowed them to rush only four when needed. Their numbers in this regard increased through the second half of the season, which allowed them to get more creative with their coverage and rotations in the middle and defensive backfield. And then when the playoffs arrived, they were able to do a lot of creative things specifically up front with Donald and Miller working off each other and also opening blitz space.

 

What I think needs to be talked about as it pertains to the Bills, though, is what Miller lent to the locker room as a (then one-time) Super Bowl champion. He literally brought a replica Lombardi Trophy to the Rams facilities, set it on the training room table that everybody walked by each morning and wrote daily notes next to it about what it would take to hold the real thing. He reached Donald in a way not many people can and actually helped Donald find another gear to his game — which, let’s face it, we didn’t realize was even possible. There are only a few teams who truly contend each year, and the Rams are one of them. Now, the Bills certainly are as well. But the difference between constant playoff appearances and an actual championship comes down to the little details on the field, and off it.

  • Like (+1) 8
  • Thank you (+1) 3
Posted
45 minutes ago, Mikie's Bills said:

The trade-off is that Von's 1st year of the deal will be a low cap hit for us so we can fit it into our limited cap space (spreading the signing bonus over 6 years instead of 3). We will have dead cap on the books (how much remains to be seen) for the last 2-3 years of the deal when it's likely he'll be cut because he is no longer worth the money.

 

Chandler's deal is more friendly to a team that can afford his large cap number this year. And obviously the Raiders don't have to worry about any dead money if he remains productive and healthy for the next 3 years.

 

Assuming we get 3 years out of Von we could be looking at dead cap hits of $15M in year 4, $10M in year 5, $5M in year 6 (pure guesses). Obviously not ideal but Beane is banking on the cap going up dramatically over the next few years so those numbers will hurt less than they do now. Still, opportunity cost is that we will most likely miss out on signing some of our own and other FAs as dead money starts to pile up in future years.


Thank you! I guess it is fair to assume he will play the 4th year as the dead cap hit could be close to his salary cap hit?
 

What if he retires? 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
15 hours ago, patzen said:

Hmmm...LA hosting Buffalo to start the season just got a little more interesting. I wasn't expecting that to be the matchup but this signing makes it pretty intriguing.

That is a possibility.

 

Although I think they will go with Denver. They'll want to highlight Russell Wilson's debut with the Broncos.

Posted
1 hour ago, hondo in seattle said:

I hate to be Eeyore - that's not usually the role I play - but I don't like this signing.   

 

Look at the production of pass rushers post 33yo.  Von Miller is still a great player but the decline is inevitable.  

 

And then there's the opportunity cost.  What players will we pass up because  so much money is tied up in Von?   That's my worry.

 

But, as others have pointed out, the devil is in the (contract) details.  If VM averages 10 sacks for the next few years and the real deal is 4 years at 17mill/year....  maybe Von is almost worth his price.

 

 

 

 

Sacks in the regular season is really irrelevant to me. If Miller shows up in the playoffs & SB, then he will be well worth it… and there’s no reason to believe he wouldn’t.

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
1 minute ago, Rico said:

Sacks in the regular season is really irrelevant to me. If Miller shows up in the playoffs & SB, then he will be well worth it… and there’s no reason to believe he wouldn’t.

 

You sign a guy like that for the one play in a game that you absolutely need him to make.  You'll know when it happens.  Bruce was like that.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
42 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

I dunno about fantastic, but the some of the points are germaine about the difference between how a cap-rich team will structure a contract to hit heavily in the first year and perhaps evenly over 3 years, but how a cap-tight team will "roll the can down the road" to trade a low initial cap hit for the risk of the cap/performance ratio going out of whack in later years. 

 

I think the germaine point is that if the contract contains $45M guaranteed at signing, $51.5M guaranteed overall, it's not unreasonable to look at it as a 3 year, $51.5M contract ($17M/yr) where some of the cost is "kicked down the road" into the final years. 

 

Beane has shown himself good at managing this kind of risk, and our S&C staff has shown itself to be adept at keeping players healthy and productive (sprinkle in some luck and knock wood). 

 

As for "opportunity  cost", we have to consider that there's been "opportunity cost" in many of the contracts the Bills have had over the last several years, including Hughes, Addison, and Lotulelei.

Another fantastic analysis. Why can't both post be fantastic? 

Posted
23 minutes ago, stosh64 said:

Not sure if this was posted but it a MUST watch for Bills fans.

Let's GO!!!  It's GMFB btw...CLICK IT!

 

Nice video, watching unbiased journalists gush over the Bills.

Posted
4 hours ago, MAJBobby said:

Some more Lockerroom Stuff with Miller

 

There is an entire story on Millers impact to that lockerroom trying to find the entire article

I think this is the Article on it.  But I dont subscribe to the athletic 

 

https://theathletic.com/3191131/2022/03/17/von-miller-joins-the-bills-what-will-he-bring-to-buffalo-and-what-do-the-rams-do-now/

https://www.yahoo.com/video/von-miller-takes-aim-super-123018851.html

Holy shat… his presence in that locker room has me more excited than his on field contributions 

Posted
10 minutes ago, julian said:

Holy shat… his presence in that locker room has me more excited than his on field contributions 

really?

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Scott7975 said:

Some Bills fans will be pissed off about anything.  Beane sucks, he has no big signings.  Beane sucks he over paid.  Big signings are usually over paid.  Contracts are also not always contracts.  Von Miller won't see 6 years.  Just sit back and relax. This team could have won a super bowl last year and they just got better.

 

I never say Beane sucks.  Just the opposite: I think he's a good GM.  I'm not worried about Beane's big signings: I'm just happy he's made the roster better.  And I know a six-year contract is not necessarily a six-year contract.  And I will absolutely love seeing Von Miller in a Bills uni later this year.


Despite all that, I still question this deal.  Bruce still produced at a good - not great - level in his mid 30s.  Maybe Von will too.  I hope so.   But I think we'll end up paying Von $1+ million per sack over the next 3-4 years.  And I wonder if that money would have been better spent elsewhere.  

 

 

Edited by hondo in seattle
Posted
1 minute ago, hondo in seattle said:

 

I never say Beane sucks.  Just the opposite: I think he's a good GM.  I'm not worried about Beane's big signings: I'm just happy he's made the roster better.  And I know a six-year contract is not necessarily a six-year contract.  And I will absolutely love seeing Von Miller in a Bills uni later this year.


Despite all that, I still question this deal.  Bruce still produced at a good - not great - level in his mid 30s.  Maybe Von will too.  I hope so.   But I think we'll end up paying Von $10++ million per sack over the next 3-4 years.  And I wonder if that money would have been better spent elsewhere.  

You think Miller will have less than 2 sacks per year over the next 3-4 years?!  Really?

Posted
1 hour ago, Logic said:

 

 

What I think needs to be talked about as it pertains to the Bills, though, is what Miller lent to the locker room as a (then one-time) Super Bowl champion. He literally brought a replica Lombardi Trophy to the Rams facilities, set it on the training room table that everybody walked by each morning and wrote daily notes next to it about what it would take to hold the real thing. He reached Donald in a way not many people can and actually helped Donald find another gear to his game — which, let’s face it, we didn’t realize was even possible. There are only a few teams who truly contend each year, and the Rams are one of them. Now, the Bills certainly are as well. But the difference between constant playoff appearances and an actual championship comes down to the little details on the field, and off it.

 

I gotta admit, the locker room leadership stuff does excite me.

 

Showing my age... I remember when we signed Phil Villipiano - when he was past his prime - to help build a winning culture.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 3
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...