Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

OOF. He gets the same bank and says put. I guess I can understand it but I think its kind  a skeezy look on his part. A mans word is no longer his bond clearly.

 

 

Posted
10 minutes ago, Punch said:

Sure, that would change the equation somewhat but that’s not what happened here. Every team is under the same parameters during the “legal tampering” period and understands the potential consequences of handshake agreements. 

 

if it’s anyone’s fault, it’s Washington. In addition to not offering McKissic a contract they seemingly lied to Matt Ionnaidis’ agent and also waited as late as possible to release a bunch of players to clear space. Factoring in the Wentz trade, everything they’ve done thus far is bush league.

For all we know they were trying to pull someone else in, and when that didn't happen they doubled back on McKissinc, too.  It just feels sheisty like modern dating does

Posted
14 minutes ago, muppy said:

OOF. He gets the same bank and says put. I guess I can understand it but I think its kind  a skeezy look on his part. A mans word is no longer his bond clearly.

 

 

Not to mention the fact that it took another team making him that offer, until Washington would make him the same offer.  He really wants to work for an employer that plays that game with him?

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, strive_for_five_guy said:

Not to mention the fact that it took another team making him that offer, until Washington would make him the same offer.  He really wants to work for an employer that plays that game with him?

Happens every day in corporate America but I thought the nfl might be different 

Posted (edited)

I literally have no clue who this guy is, I wouldn’t watch a WFT game on a bet. That being said, make millions of dollars in a place with rules, standards and expectations or make the same money at Dan Snyder’s frat party. He ain’t going to Washington for a championship.

Edited by JDubya76
  • Agree 1
Posted
4 hours ago, BillsVet said:

So much for that theory Buffalo was a destination because of Josh.  Nothing against Josh, he's excellent, but something else is afoot here. 

 

You're trying too hard. It has reached the point that I'm feeling embarrassed for you.

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

I have no problem with this. He was a moderate upgrade from Moss and Breida, but still a #2. He would have been our 3rd down back, but he can be replaced easily enough. I'd rather have a big back for late season home games.

Posted
5 hours ago, BillsVet said:

So much for that theory Buffalo was a destination because of Josh.  Nothing against Josh, he's excellent, but something else is afoot here. 

so...maybe nothing is afoot?

Posted
9 minutes ago, Doc said:

With the signing of Miller, I'll bet he wishes he didn't change his mind.

No, he'll wish he didn't change his mind when we're in the superbowl next year 

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...