Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
14 minutes ago, MAJBobby said:

Cap moves Bills still have left pretty easily with little impact to talent level.

 

Beasley - cut/trade/paycut

Diggs - Extension

White - Restructure

Edmunds - Extension

Dawkins - Restructure

Poyer - Restructure

Milano - Restructure

Star - Cut (Post June 1 Designation)

 

 

Wouldn't Poyer make sense with his contract expiring this year? 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Mango said:

 

A bunch of numbers are missing on OTC and Spotrac. 

Any idea what our space is looking like in 2023? 

Right now roughly 45M.

 

https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/buffalo-bills/cap/2023/

 

But it will be less than 15M once all FA contracts, restructures and rookie contracts kick in. Maybe even close to zero. And that will be without Edmunds and hopefully Knox extensions.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, D. L. Hot-Flamethrower said:

Is that all it does? Damn

so you want to play GM... the draft is going to cost another 6M to sign the rooks, plus dead cap as of today is at 9.9M not counting possible release of #11 which would add another 1M+ plus, plus Beano wants to carry a surplus of 2M+, plus you got to pay the practice squad barnyard animals,BTW, no backup (vet) qb signed as of yet...then you got to decide whether to keep Star or not...then likely Diggs extension, and maybe Edmunds...and we wonder why there are some decision misses along the way...

Edited by First Round Bust
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, No_Matter_What said:

Hmm why do you think that? McKissic is 7/2, so probably around 2.5M first year. If Jones rumors are correct, he is 14/2, so at least 5M first year. Saffold has a dummy year, but I doubt his cap hit this year is less than 4M. So that is at least 11M together.

Because they would not have done it if they didnt need to fit these players.  I fully think that they will fit.  within the 8.M 

 

Like Settle for example. his cap is 2.6M this year.  and that is on a 4.5AAV they were able to structure for roughly 2M lower than AAV this year.  so that mind set with the others they can get them fit in 8.M IMO

7 minutes ago, Mango said:

 

Wouldn't Poyer make sense with his contract expiring this year? 

Sorry meant extension there.  will fix it

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

Bills kicking the can down the road

 

Honestly if they continue to offer and sign players to smart contracts that allows restructuring they will be able to continue to do this for the foreseeable future 

 

Sign your core to long term deals, sign secondary players to shorter term easy to get out of deals and most importantly develop players from the draft  

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Big Turk said:

 

Gonna be way more than that...it's going to go up probably $80-90 million over the next 4 years. Those TV contracts getting ready to kick in are MASSIVE

 

Not to mention all the legalized gambling revenue the league has just started collecting.

 

On a related subject I notice a huge reliance on Spotrac and an under reliance on OvertheCap: https://overthecap.com/salary-cap-space/

 

I've found that their numbers often differ, especially on individual player projections, Levi Wallace being a good example of that.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, No_Matter_What said:

Right now roughly 45M.

 

https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/buffalo-bills/cap/2023/

 

But it will be less than 15M once all FA contracts, restructures and rookie contracts kick in. Maybe even close to zero. And that will be without Edmunds and hopefully Knox extensions.

 

 

That was my big fear heading into this offseason. Getting through it without trashing the next year. 

$15M is OK. But we have Edmunds, Knox, Poyer, 

Posted
1 hour ago, No_Matter_What said:

Hmm per sportrac they spread it over 5 years, creating 3 void years with dead cap §1.1M each.

 

https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/buffalo-bills/micah-hyde-12440/

 

Not sure I like this. 

 

But like I said I will judge once FA is over.

 

  

 

Well it is not all we are doing. We are also creating lot of dead cap for future years. I am not saying we shouldn't do it but it is important to note.

 

I would imagine that they have every intention of re-signing Hyde after this season which would essentially tear up those void years. 

Posted
1 hour ago, ChanticleerBillsFan said:

This cap stuff is confusing. All I know is bring us more players! 

It's pretty straight forward.  If you need to free up cap space, make it a signing bonus in a restructured contract.

 

Most of the other numbers are really irrelevant.

Posted
26 minutes ago, No_Matter_What said:

Right now roughly 45M.

 

https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/buffalo-bills/cap/2023/

 

But it will be less than 15M once all FA contracts, restructures and rookie contracts kick in. Maybe even close to zero. And that will be without Edmunds and hopefully Knox extensions.

 

and Star will still have 4 years left on his contract, and it will be impossible to get out until NEXT YEAR. Always next year!

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, No_Matter_What said:

We are also creating lot of dead cap for future years. I am not saying we shouldn't do it but it is important to note.

So, this is where the front office guys are earning their money.  It's not really "dead" cap if the guy is still playing for you.  It does reduce the amount of cap room you have in a future year, for sure, but if the guy is still productive in your lineup, it hurts less.  All you've done is averaged the cost of the guy across the years he's playing for you.  

 

The restructured deals are typically with guys the Bills project will be around to cover the "dead" cap.  They think Hyde will.  Presumably they think Milano will.  

 

It's related to what I just said in the thread about why McBeane don't sign superstars in free agency.  In both cases, they're considering the average cost of the player over his playing career.  

 

Still, there is an element of kicking the can down the road here, because dead cap is dead cap.  But the good teams, and the Bills are one of those, seem to know how to manage it, year after year, to keep a steady stream of talent coming and staying in the building.   

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, BrooklynBills said:

 

I would imagine that they have every intention of re-signing Hyde after this season which would essentially tear up those void years. 

As far as I understand it any re-signing will not help with those void years. If we re-sign him whatever we pay him takes another cap space, in addition to existing dead cap (3,4M).

25 minutes ago, MAJBobby said:

Because they would not have done it if they didnt need to fit these players.  I fully think that they will fit.  within the 8.M 

 

Like Settle for example. his cap is 2.6M this year.  and that is on a 4.5AAV they were able to structure for roughly 2M lower than AAV this year.  so that mind set with the others they can get them fit in 8.M IMO

 

I highly doubt that it is even possible to fit McKissic, Jones and Saffold within 8M cap this year, provided that 14/2 Jones number published by agent is remotely accurate.

 

We will revisit this once the numbers are known, I'll find you :)

 

Thanks for the job you are doing in this thread / FA thread btw.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, Shaw66 said:

So, this is where the front office guys are earning their money.  It's not really "dead" cap if the guy is still playing for you.  It does reduce the amount of cap room you have in a future year, for sure, but if the guy is still productive in your lineup, it hurts less.  All you've done is averaged the cost of the guy across the years he's playing for you.  

 

The restructured deals are typically with guys the Bills project will be around to cover the "dead" cap.  They think Hyde will.  Presumably they think Milano will.  

 

It's related to what I just said in the thread about why McBeane don't sign superstars in free agency.  In both cases, they're considering the average cost of the player over his playing career.  

 

Still, there is an element of kicking the can down the road here, because dead cap is dead cap.  But the good teams, and the Bills are one of those, seem to know how to manage it, year after year, to keep a steady stream of talent coming and staying in the building.   

Yeah I know. I meant (i) dead cap from void years and (ii) restructures of active players. In the end both means kicking the can down the road. Past years we've made very few of these moves, since we didn't have to. Now we will have to. I fully trust Beane to be smart, it is just an uncharted territory for this regime imo.

Edited by No_Matter_What
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...