Tremaine Edmunds contract comparison

[BADOLBILZ]

1 hour ago, H2o said:

I don't think Edmunds takes anything less than we gave Milano last year. 

 

 

Yep and if the light doesn't come on in year 5...........then see ya' Tremaine, IMO.

 

I don't care if he bulb doesn't spark until he is elsewhere in year 6..........like it did with Demario Davis..........ILB's who don't make plays are very replaceable and you can't pay that light bill before you get some juice.

 

[Lost]

De'Vondre Campbell was far more productive than Edmunds in 2021 so if we're making that comparison and paying for productivity, not some false hope of potential, then no.   3 yrs 28 would be best offer I would be okay with to extend him.

[Brand J]

This thread might reach 80 pages and extend well into the season 😂 I would only entertain the idea of Edmunds at $10M/yr if our base defense was a 4-3 and he proved to be more impactful as a weakside OLB. I don’t like him at $10M/yr in his current nickel role, not enough return on a double digit million dollar contract.

[BullBuchanan]

1 hour ago, Dopey said:

I will say, he has some issues like any other player, but I feel the tandem we have is one of the better tandems in the league.

all due respect, but there's no way this is anywhere close to true. Last year PFF ranked us 14th, and I can't possibly see how we improved there. I think Edmunds was worse this year than he was in 2020.

[Dopey]

37 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said:

all due respect, but there's no way this is anywhere close to true. Last year PFF ranked us 14th, and I can't possibly see how we improved there. I think Edmunds was worse this year than he was in 2020.

Again, polarizing. Will be watching to see what we do there.

Go BILLS!

[Chaos]

Can we upgrade the position? 

[BullBuchanan]

4 hours ago, Chaos said:

Can we upgrade the position? 

If we sign Bobby Wagner, otherwise it's doubtful.

[Thurman#1]

12 hours ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

Would you do this contract right now?

 

 

 

 

Amusing.

 

They already paid him $13.2M.

 

 

Edited March 15, 2022 by Thurman#1

[SoMAn]

No. 

[colin]

im still torn on this, but leaning more no.

 

the contracts we are seeing this off season tell me that we over pay our line backers and under pay our WRs.

[Locomark]

Can we stop with the “but he is young” as a positive?  All it means is we have to pay more money for him to gain experience he could have gotten in college and for us to figure out who he really is. It doesn’t guarantee he will play longer nor does it guarantee he has more improvement to make.