Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, Mark Vader said:

Beane loves his old free agents.

 

GO BILLS!!!

Free agency is how Beane fills holes.  Saffold is a great hole filler. 

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, Process said:

 

Woah!

 

Will wait for the numbers before judging the signing. He will be 34yo next season. Not sure an aging guard is the best guy to give big money too....

 


It didn’t say anything about “big money” though 

Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Logic said:

I know he's a "name" and that he's worked with Kromer before, but he's aging and declining.

I'll wait to see the contract numbers before I form an opinion. I doubt he'll be worse than Williams.

He also doesn't count against the compensatory pick formula because he was a cut player, so there's that.

The numbers will be key.  I’d venture to say that Beane somehow paid 11-12m aav.  If it is, I hope it’s only  11-12 gtd. 
 

edit: 1 year deal….would be nice to see that number under 10M but expecting 11-13

Edited by NewEra
Posted
2 minutes ago, Mikie's Bills said:

Good to very good run blocker. Below average in pass protection at this point in his career.


Right. That is sort of what I got. I get we have to run the ball better. But if I have to choose between the pass blocker or the run blocker, and I pay my QB $45M+, I’m taking the pass blocker. 
 

2 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

You've captured my concerns concisely.  I don't think Saffold is That Guy any more.

 

On the other hand...he started his career 12 years ago as a LT, and has played RG and LG.  So there's that.


I know we didn’t like the Williams contract. But 12th highest paid OG in the league is trending towards average and we got that production out of him. 
 

My initial thought is I would have preferred to maybe extend Williams and up his guaranteed money to lower his cap hit rather than pay a premium for Saffold. 
 

There’s also a strong possibility I am an idiot. So who can really say who is right and who isn’t? 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, NewEra said:

The numbers will be key.  I’d venture to say that Beane somehow paid 11-12m aav.  If it is, I hope it’s only  11-12 gtd. 


If we're paying 12M for a 34 year-old-guard...yeesh. 

I hope it's less than that.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, gonzo1105 said:


👃 Smells like a 1 year deal with a 2nd added to lower the cap number 👃 

Probably drafting a young guy to hopefully replace him by then too.

Posted

This is the one thing I questioned when Kromer came back. Does his return indicate a desire to run the football more? The signing of Saffold sure makes you wonder, and if so I'm not a huge fan of that philosophy

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted

Repeat what I said when TEN cut him. 

 

1. Never been a huge fan of his, think he has been overrated and overpaid most of his career;

 

2. He definitely is on the decline;

 

3. He has some history with Kromer so that helps the adjustment;

 

4. I hope it is a cheap deal. 

  • Like (+1) 4
Posted
1 minute ago, Mango said:


Right. That is sort of what I got. I get we have to run the ball better. But if I have to choose between the pass blocker or the run blocker, and I pay my QB $45M+, I’m taking the pass blocker. 
 


I know we didn’t like the Williams contract. But 12th highest paid OG in the league is trending towards average and we got that production out of him. 
 

My initial thought is I would have preferred to maybe extend Williams and up his guaranteed money to lower his cap hit rather than pay a premium for Saffold. 
 

There’s also a strong possibility I am an idiot. So who can really say who is right and who isn’t? 

He's probably a negligible upgrade from Williams talent wise. But the FO is banking on him being a better fit for their scheme. 

  • Like (+1) 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...