Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 minutes ago, TBBills said:

Ok... so 3rd string?

Yeah, not really thinking 3rd string. More of like a James White role with a few spot carries and primary 3rd down RB. 

  • Agree 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, H2o said:

Yeah, not really thinking 3rd string. More of like a James White role with a few spot carries and primary 3rd down RB. 

 

Looking more and more like the screen game is coming back to Buffalo

  • Agree 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Motor26 said:

Hunter + picks or Chandler Jones for no picks? Hunter is still in his prime but we’ve seen defensive ends still play well at age 30+.

Yeah….I’ll go with the lower risk situation.  I love a healthy hunter…but giving up a 1st and having to pay and extend him to a massive contract is scary. He’s gonna want 25-30M aav long term. 😳  I’d rather rent jones for 1-2 years.  Hunter is superior at this point, I’d rather keep the pick and draft a potential cornerstone player and adding a proven potential HoF pass rusher.  

  • Agree 3
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Motor26 said:

Hunter + picks or Chandler Jones for no picks? Hunter is still in his prime but we’ve seen defensive ends still play well at age 30+.

Hmm, I'd take the 27-year-old, personally. But I'd take either one. We need an elite pass rusher.

  • Agree 1
Posted

Don’t mind it. Good 3rd down back. Although I thought Beane said he was looking for “young and hungry players.” Right now only player that fits that bill is Settle.

Posted
1 minute ago, NewEra said:

Yeah….I’ll go with the lower risk situation.  I love a healthy hunter…but giving up a 1st and having to pay and extend him to a massive contract is scary. He’s gonna want 25-30M aav long term. 😳  I’d rather rent jones for 1-2 years.  Hunter is superior at this point, I’d rather keep the pick and draft a potential cornerstone player and adding a proven potential HoF pass rusher.  

 

Put me in this camp, as well. Gimme the savvy Jones and a speed WR at #25 (got the rosary out for Jameson Wiliams).

  • Agree 4
  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, NewEra said:

Yeah….I’ll go with the lower risk situation.  I love a healthy hunter…but giving up a 1st and having to pay and extend him to a massive contract is scary. He’s gonna want 25-30M aav long term. 😳  I’d rather rent jones for 1-2 years.  Hunter is superior at this point, I’d rather keep the pick and draft a potential cornerstone player and adding a proven potential HoF pass rusher.  

I agree with the sentiment, but no one is giving up a first for Danielle Hunter. That's been the case for a few years now, and especially not now with the Vikings looking at likely having to cut him.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, NewEra said:

Yeah….I’ll go with the lower risk situation.  I love a healthy hunter…but giving up a 1st and having to pay and extend him to a massive contract is scary. He’s gonna want 25-30M aav long term. 😳  I’d rather rent jones for 1-2 years.  Hunter is superior at this point, I’d rather keep the pick and draft a potential cornerstone player and adding a proven potential HoF pass rusher.  


I agree. If somehow Hunter could be had for the Bills 2nd that’s another story, but Minny will surely want a 1st. Jones is a great fit for the defense. 

Posted
Just now, TBBills said:

Ok... so 3rd string?

 

Are we you even allowed to field an NFL team if you don't have an RB3 who might be better than your RB2, and healthy scratch him every week? 

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
18 minutes ago, TBBills said:

Ok... so 3rd string?

Yea but Poyer is also 30+ so this young kids contract has nothing to do with him.

 

Well that isn't the way the NFL has  ever worked...but OK...

 

Poyer will be paid based on his performance compared to his peers. If he plays like one of the best safeties in the league again, he will be paid in the same range as one of the best safeties in the league. Maybe he doesn't get 5 years, he gets 2 or 3. Maybe a couple bucks get taken off. 

But to say another safety getting paid doesn't have anything to do with our safety getting paid is absurd. 

Posted (edited)
Just now, Mango said:

 

Well that isn't the way the NFL has  ever worked...but OK...

 

Poyer will be paid based on his performance compared to his peers. If he plays like one of the best safeties in the league again, he will be paid in the same range as one of the best safeties in the league. Maybe he doesn't get 5 years, he gets 2 or 3. Maybe a couple bucks get taken off. 

But to say another safety getting paid doesn't have anything to do with our safety getting paid is absurd. 

It actually is exactly how the NFL works. It's why the old guys don't get paid as much.

Edited by TBBills
Posted
5 minutes ago, Not at the table Karlos said:

How many have been signed? 

 

DEs:

  • Chandler Jones
  • Von Miller
  • Randy Gregory - Denver Broncos
  • Haason Reddick - Carolina Panthers
  • Emmanuel Ogbah - Miami Dolphins
  • Jadaveon Clowney 
  • Derek Barnett
  • Melvin Ingram
  • Uchenna Nwosu
  • Jerry Hughes
  • Arden Key

 

I'm not sure if "dwindling" is the right word just yet

  • Thank you (+1) 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...