SoCal Deek Posted June 8, 2022 Share Posted June 8, 2022 11 minutes ago, Tiberius said: No blaming Putin? Seriously, just blame our president who has nothing to do with it? Can we blame them both? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TSOL Posted June 8, 2022 Share Posted June 8, 2022 The only relief from this new economy is going to come from voting republican in 2024. This administration and the entire liberal progressive agenda is to blame for this economy. 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 8, 2022 Share Posted June 8, 2022 12 minutes ago, Tiberius said: blame our president who has nothing to do with it? Every time I think that Tibs can't go any lower, there he goes. Contrast that statement with everything else he has claimed previously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted June 8, 2022 Share Posted June 8, 2022 2 minutes ago, B-Man said: Every time I think that Tibs can't go any lower, there he goes. Contrast that statement with everything else he has claimed previously. Great evidence B-Man Your outrage fits your ignorance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TSOL Posted June 8, 2022 Share Posted June 8, 2022 You knew we were screwed when the first thing the Biden administration did was mandate the firing of nurses smack dab in the middle of a health care crisis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dpberr Posted June 8, 2022 Share Posted June 8, 2022 Gas prices will be $6 by July 4th, not Labor Day. Labor Day, it'll be at or near $8. I expect that to occur because this administration wouldn't have let the prices break the $5 barrier if they either knew how or cared to. They know they've crossed the political Rubicon with gas prices. Target having record inventory in TVs and house "stuff" is another microcosm sign of customers throttling down discretionary spending. It's not Target overreaction to COVID, it's customers cutting back. I've also noticed that for restaurants where you'd have to wait for a table, there's no longer a wait. In my area, people enjoy dining out on the weekend, and restaurants are usually quite full, even in previous downturns, they'd be busy. Past couple weekends, easy to get a seat without the wait, which suggests to me folks are beginning to throttle down that discretionary dining spending too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted June 8, 2022 Share Posted June 8, 2022 3 minutes ago, dpberr said: Gas prices will be $6 by July 4th, not Labor Day. Labor Day, it'll be at or near $8. I expect that to occur because this administration wouldn't have let the prices break the $5 barrier if they either knew how or cared to. They know they've crossed the political Rubicon with gas prices. Target having record inventory in TVs and house "stuff" is another microcosm sign of customers throttling down discretionary spending. It's not Target overreaction to COVID, it's customers cutting back. I've also noticed that for restaurants where you'd have to wait for a table, there's no longer a wait. In my area, people enjoy dining out on the weekend, and restaurants are usually quite full, even in previous downturns, they'd be busy. Past couple weekends, easy to get a seat without the wait, which suggests to me folks are beginning to throttle down that discretionary dining spending too. The administration what? They control gas prices? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TSOL Posted June 8, 2022 Share Posted June 8, 2022 1 minute ago, Tiberius said: The administration what? They control gas prices? Yep. Natural gas too, I guess we are running out of that despite NYS having massive natural gas resources. Weird huh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted June 8, 2022 Share Posted June 8, 2022 11 minutes ago, TSOL said: Yep. Natural gas too, I guess we are running out of that despite NYS having massive natural gas resources. Weird huh So you do not understand economics. Thanks for sharing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted June 8, 2022 Share Posted June 8, 2022 People please....let's all just agree that the most powerful man in the world should be considered blameless on inflation (and everything else)....and instead lay all of the responsibility at the feet of some dude on the other side of the planet that apparently is the one actually in control of everything? It's so much easier! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted June 8, 2022 Share Posted June 8, 2022 Maybe God is trying to tell us something? Record heat all across the south west Quote Midland, Tex., topped 100 degrees for the 13th time in 2022, more than twice as many times as in 2021. Little change in the scorching weather pattern is expected for days over the Lone Star State. Most of central, south and west Texas will sit near or just above the century mark through at least early next week. Numerous additional record highs are predicted each day. https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2022/06/07/heat-wave-texas-southwest-phoenix/ 26 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: People please....let's all just agree that the most powerful man in the world should be considered blameless on inflation (and everything else)....and instead lay all of the responsibility at the feet of some dude on the other side of the planet that apparently is the one actually in control of everything? It's so much easier! Ha ha, you don't understand economics Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted June 8, 2022 Share Posted June 8, 2022 1 minute ago, Tiberius said: Maybe God is trying to tell us something? Record heat all across the south west By God....do you really mean Putin? 😉 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted June 8, 2022 Share Posted June 8, 2022 2 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: By God....do you really mean Putin? 😉 Oh yes, Putin made it hot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted June 8, 2022 Share Posted June 8, 2022 23 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Oh yes, Putin made it hot Keep your sense of humor Tibs…if you have one. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VaMilBill Posted June 8, 2022 Share Posted June 8, 2022 4 hours ago, Tiberius said: No blaming Putin? Seriously, just blame our president who has nothing to do with it? Biden fostered a geopolitical environment where he emboldened Putin to invade Ukraine. I don’t think Ukraine would have been invaded under Trump. on top of that, gas prices were already about 30% more expensive under Biden than under Trump. So yea, Biden does deserve a significant amount of blame 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
All_Pro_Bills Posted June 8, 2022 Share Posted June 8, 2022 4 hours ago, Tiberius said: The administration what? They control gas prices? The administration has the power to regulate interstate commerce and international trade. Issue regulations for refiners, pipelines, emissions standards, rules and regulations regarding transport of materials and products, rules and bidding for exploration and mineral rights. Issuing permits and performing environmental assessments and in most cases slow-walking the process. All kinds of things. Plus there are regulations at the State level. Regarding seasonal gasoline blends and standards like ethanol content. They also decided to ship large amounts of US produced nat gas to Europe in the form of LNG exports. They've issued sanctions, trade restrictions, and asset confiscation and freezing activities that have disrupted domestic and international commerce and trade. Putin did some of it but most of it is self-inflicted reaction and the result and consequences of sanctions. To top it off as soon as Biden cancelled Keystone on day one I knew we were screwed. So none of this is unexpected and its going to get a lot worse. If his approval rating is above 20% by the mid-terms I'll be amazed. He's letting climate activism dominate policy and he's going to pay to the extreme in November. I don't know anyone that's happy with this administration. The consensus is they just don't care and for that they're going to get run out of town. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ALF Posted June 9, 2022 Share Posted June 9, 2022 Sen Kennedy said the price of gas is so expensive in Louisiana it's cheaper to buy cocaine and run everywhere.🙂 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demongyz Posted June 9, 2022 Share Posted June 9, 2022 $6.05/g 87 octane today. over 100% increase since Joe took office. But mean tweets!!! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ComradeKayAdams Posted June 10, 2022 Share Posted June 10, 2022 On 6/8/2022 at 6:11 PM, All_Pro_Bills said: The administration has the power to regulate interstate commerce and international trade. Issue regulations for refiners, pipelines, emissions standards, rules and regulations regarding transport of materials and products, rules and bidding for exploration and mineral rights. Issuing permits and performing environmental assessments and in most cases slow-walking the process. All kinds of things. Plus there are regulations at the State level. Regarding seasonal gasoline blends and standards like ethanol content. They also decided to ship large amounts of US produced nat gas to Europe in the form of LNG exports. They've issued sanctions, trade restrictions, and asset confiscation and freezing activities that have disrupted domestic and international commerce and trade. Putin did some of it but most of it is self-inflicted reaction and the result and consequences of sanctions. To top it off as soon as Biden cancelled Keystone on day one I knew we were screwed. So none of this is unexpected and its going to get a lot worse. If his approval rating is above 20% by the mid-terms I'll be amazed. He's letting climate activism dominate policy and he's going to pay to the extreme in November. I don't know anyone that's happy with this administration. The consensus is they just don't care and for that they're going to get run out of town. I highlighted two points of contention in your post: 1. It’s not that they don’t care, “they” being the Biden administration and Democrats in Congress. They are simply constrained by what their corporate donors allow them to do. And in the case of many like Biden, at this point in their lives they are also probably too entrenched in neoliberal philosophy to explore aggressive alternative actions. I do have a tinfoil hat theory for you, however: the Democrats see a harrowingly unlikely path to victory over the next two years, so their plan is to make Biden/Harris the scapegoats and elevate someone more salable like Gavin Newsom during the 2024 presidential primaries. Hey, it would work on me! I hate Newsom, but I’d still vote for him over the rebranded trickle-down economics nonsense that the GOP always peddles as their economic panacea. 2. Even if the Keystone Pipeline System was fully functional at this very moment, it would only put a VERY modest dent on overall gas prices. This very modest dent doesn’t come close to justifying all the environmental damage that it would eventually create. Further exploitation of the Athabasca tar sands should not be encouraged in any way. And what about the Indigenous groups that the pipeline construction affects? And what about that whole climate change thing? The boreal forests of Western Canada are way too important for combating MMGW. The Keystone Pipeline System would mostly help Canada, anyway, but not the U.S. in terms of jobs. I would advise Western Canadians to find other ways to grow their economy. Since the inflation topic is by far the most important one in politics today, FWIW here’s my little contribution to PPP: What I think Biden should generally be doing to ameliorate the problem: 1. Issue a series of executive orders that expedite supply chain networks, especially at shipping port bottlenecks. 2. Publicly articulate a clear short-term and long-term national energy plan so that fossil fuel companies can better anticipate demand and moderate their releases of supply, thereby stabilizing some of the inflationary pressures (much of which is still a consequence of fossil fuel supply shocks). 3. Provide any sort of Keynesian-esque demand-side relief to working-class families (tax relief, energy credits, etc…just do something for them, please…). What is or what has been (mostly) out of Biden’s control: 1. Anthropogenic global warming constraints on public policy (note to anyone who still thinks it’s a myth: please reply to me with a published post-July 1988 scientific research paper that either refutes the observed warming altogether or explains it with any mechanism other than atmospheric carbon dioxide ppm…a published scientific research paper, please; not a link to some random fella’s website…). 2. Fossil fuel oligarchic control of government since the 1970’s energy crisis (they are chiefly responsible for our country’s relatively pathetic state of renewable energy research/development at this present moment in time). 3. Enormous global supply chain disruptions due to COVID-19 and its subsequent variants. 4. General supply chain weaknesses on the U.S. side that were exposed by the pandemic and that were, in large part, due to decades of outsourcing of domestic manufacturing jobs. 5. Putin’s invasion of Ukraine that has affected much of the fossil fuel energy and wheat/grain food markets. 6. The world economic market for fossil fuels that sets the supply, the demand, and thus our prices of oil and gas independent of U.S. political decisions. 7. The privatized status of the U.S. fossil fuel industry, which means that these companies are largely free to sell domestic supply wherever they want in the world, make use of drilling permits however they want, and thereby drive domestic energy supply/demand/costs (to some extent) to their own financial advantage and not necessarily for any greater societal good. 8. The cumulative effects of American imperialism since the advent of the Cold War that have limited import/export options on the international energy markets. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted June 10, 2022 Share Posted June 10, 2022 9 minutes ago, Delete_Account said: I highlighted two points of contention in your post: 1. It’s not that they don’t care, “they” being the Biden administration and Democrats in Congress. They are simply constrained by what their corporate donors allow them to do. And in the case of many like Biden, at this point in their lives they are also probably too entrenched in neoliberal philosophy to explore aggressive alternative actions. I do have a tinfoil hat theory for you, however: the Democrats see a harrowingly unlikely path to victory over the next two years, so their plan is to make Biden/Harris the scapegoats and elevate someone more salable like Gavin Newsom during the 2024 presidential primaries. Hey, it would work on me! I hate Newsom, but I’d still vote for him over the rebranded trickle-down economics nonsense that the GOP always peddles as their economic panacea. 2. Even if the Keystone Pipeline System was fully functional at this very moment, it would only put a VERY modest dent on overall gas prices. This very modest dent doesn’t come close to justifying all the environmental damage that it would eventually create. Further exploitation of the Athabasca tar sands should not be encouraged in any way. And what about the Indigenous groups that the pipeline construction affects? And what about that whole climate change thing? The boreal forests of Western Canada are way too important for combating MMGW. The Keystone Pipeline System would mostly help Canada, anyway, but not the U.S. in terms of jobs. I would advise Western Canadians to find other ways to grow their economy. Since the inflation topic is by far the most important one in politics today, FWIW here’s my little contribution to PPP: What I think Biden should generally be doing to ameliorate the problem: 1. Issue a series of executive orders that expedite supply chain networks, especially at shipping port bottlenecks. 2. Publicly articulate a clear short-term and long-term national energy plan so that fossil fuel companies can better anticipate demand and moderate their releases of supply, thereby stabilizing some of the inflationary pressures (much of which is still a consequence of fossil fuel supply shocks). 3. Provide any sort of Keynesian-esque demand-side relief to working-class families (tax relief, energy credits, etc…just do something for them, please…). What is or what has been (mostly) out of Biden’s control: 1. Anthropogenic global warming constraints on public policy (note to anyone who still thinks it’s a myth: please reply to me with a published post-July 1988 scientific research paper that either refutes the observed warming altogether or explains it with any mechanism other than atmospheric carbon dioxide ppm…a published scientific research paper, please; not a link to some random fella’s website…). 2. Fossil fuel oligarchic control of government since the 1970’s energy crisis (they are chiefly responsible for our country’s relatively pathetic state of renewable energy research/development at this present moment in time). 3. Enormous global supply chain disruptions due to COVID-19 and its subsequent variants. 4. General supply chain weaknesses on the U.S. side that were exposed by the pandemic and that were, in large part, due to decades of outsourcing of domestic manufacturing jobs. 5. Putin’s invasion of Ukraine that has affected much of the fossil fuel energy and wheat/grain food markets. 6. The world economic market for fossil fuels that sets the supply, the demand, and thus our prices of oil and gas independent of U.S. political decisions. 7. The privatized status of the U.S. fossil fuel industry, which means that these companies are largely free to sell domestic supply wherever they want in the world, make use of drilling permits however they want, and thereby drive domestic energy supply/demand/costs (to some extent) to their own financial advantage and not necessarily for any greater societal good. 8. The cumulative effects of American imperialism since the advent of the Cold War that have limited import/export options on the international energy markets. Thanks for the thesis paper, Kay. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts