Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, PetermansRedemption said:

They might want to look at the rest of the AFC before that case stays empty for quite a while. 

There would be epic games for sure.  But I would like Watsons chances.  Considering how highly he ranks in QB field of the AFC.

 

His 2020 season was just incredible considering the barren wasteland of talent around him.

 

Give him JT running the rock and that defense in a weak AFC SOUTH.

 

12 wins should be the minimum.

Edited by RalphWilson'sNewWar
  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
29 minutes ago, Blainorama5 said:

Ok then.  Guess he's mister-super-nice-guy, never-did-any-harm to anyone ever guy now - so teams will start lining up for him.  🤨

They sure will- guys like us would be behind bars.

Posted
25 minutes ago, IronMaidenBills said:

Why do people play these kinds of games? Dude wasn’t charged with anything, end of story. 

That is not the same thing as saying he didn’t do anything bad.  All it means is that they did not have enough evidence to indict him as it is a “he says she says” case.  That doesn’t mean that he did or did not do anything wrong.

Posted
23 minutes ago, Beast said:

 

A District Attorney's Office will also present a case to a Grand Jury to be able to say, "there wasn't enough evidence" to indict. This is why there wasn't an arrest to begin with. Both the Police and the DA's Office probably felt it was suspect to begin with but it became a high profile case. Nobody (police, DA's Office) wanted egg on their face when it shook out but they are off the hook and did their due diligence.

The whole thing sounded fishy from the start.  Young women today are ridiculous.  Did they stop putting brains in females who were born after 1995?  Seriously all they do is look at their phones and take selfies.  Glad I grew up in the 70's and 80's.

  • Vomit 1
  • Eyeroll 3
Posted
Just now, OldTimer1960 said:

That is not the same thing as saying he didn’t do anything bad.  All it means is that they did not have enough evidence to indict him as it is a “he says she says” case.  That doesn’t mean that he did or did not do anything wrong.

 

This is true. Which I’ve said he may not be the role model to look up to, but he isn’t under any legal issues so he will likely continue to be employed in the NFL. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, IronMaidenBills said:

 

This is true. Which I’ve said he may not be the role model to look up to, but he isn’t under any legal issues so he will likely continue to be employed in the NFL. 

Agreed

Posted (edited)

1. This is not unexpected.

 

2. It doesn't mean the women are lying. It means there is no realistic possibility of proving it beyond reasonable doubt.

 

3. He will play in the NFL again. It probably won't be 2022. But I expect he will start somewhere on the opening weekend of 2023.

Edited by GunnerBill
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, billsfan_34 said:

They sure will- guys like us would be behind bars.

 

Actually sexual assault is one of the least prosecuted crimes whoever is involved and that is because it is often, as in these cases, one person's word vs another, with no independant witnesses. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

1. This is not unexpected.

 

2. It doesn't mean the women are lying. It means there is no realistic possibility of proving it beyond reasonable doubt.

 

3. He will play in the NFL again. It probably won't be 2022. But I expect he will start somewhere on the opening weekend of 2023.

You don’t think he plays this year?

Posted
2 minutes ago, TBBills said:

Money wins again.

 

More like gold digging women just trying to get what looked like an easy pay day

  • Vomit 1
  • Disagree 1
  • Dislike 1
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, TBBills said:

Money wins again.

Nobody here knows the truth. I’m not going to sit here and be mad at something we cannot prove one way or the other. If you guys want to, feel free. 

Edited by IronMaidenBills
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Disagree 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

1. This is not unexpected.

 

2. It doesn't mean the women are lying. It means there is no realistic possibility of proving it beyond reasonable doubt.

 

3. He will play in the NFL again. It probably won't be 2022. But I expect he will start somewhere on the opening weekend of 2023.

 

Doesn't mean they are telling the truth either.

Posted
1 minute ago, Big Turk said:

 

Doesn't mean they are telling the truth either.

Unfortunately some people make up crimes to get attention or money, and it ruins other honest victim’s credibility. Sadly now the courts have to do their best with what information they have. Public opinions will do what public opinions alway do, speculate based off emotions. 

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...