Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So it looks like:

 

SEAHAWKS GET: Drew Lock, Noah Fant, Shelby Harris, 2 first rounders, a fifth rounder

 

BRONCOS GET: Wilson, a 4th rounder

 

 

What a steal for Denver. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, coloradobillsfan said:

USA TODAY NFL

@usatodaynfl

6m

The Seahawks will receive two first-round picks, two second-round selections, QB Drew Lock, TE Noah Fant and DL Shelby Harris.

---

 

That is a king's ransom

Especially with Wilson being 33 years old. I mean Denver still has some good players but that's a lot to give up. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, coloradobillsfan said:

USA TODAY NFL

@usatodaynfl

6m

The Seahawks will receive two first-round picks, two second-round selections, QB Drew Lock, TE Noah Fant and DL Shelby Harris.

---

 

That is a king's ransom


 

Even with all that - I think Denver won the trade so far.  
 

 

  • Disagree 2
  • Agree 3
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
28 minutes ago, Magox said:

WOW!

 

This is actually good for the Bills, makes it easier for us to get Homefield playoff advantage through the playoffs.

 

Absolutely.  Right now things are setting up for Buffalo and Josh Allen similarly to how it was set up for Brady and the Patriots for years.  Buffalo is playing in the 2nd worst division in the AFC (AFC South is pretty obviously the worst) and Buffalo is more dominant than the most dominant team in the AFC South (Titans?  Colts?).

 

Without any offseason moves at this point and knowing that our opponents next season are the AFC North (now minus Big Ben and Cleveland is still a mess) and NFC North (possibly the weakest NFC conference) and at this moment I wonder if the Vegas needle has moved from Kansas City to Buffalo for next season as far as who wins the AFC and Super Bowl.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 2
Posted

For all the cap experts, its 26 million in dead money on the Seahawks cap with a trade. All of these things are doable. CMC, Mack whoever. Everyone is movable. It's monopoly. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Rochesterfan said:


 

Even with all that - I think Denver won the trade so far.  
 

 

If Denver is playing to win a Super Bowl the next two seasons sure but I don't think they have the running game/defense to take them to a championship. 

Posted
13 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

Wow.

@mannc here is your route to Willis #1. Watch Seattle package some of these picks to go up again from #9.

I mean, I guess they could roll with Drew Lock this year...or maybe this becomes a Trubisky landing spot.  I'm having a hard time seeing the 'Hawks giving up a lot to move up to 1 overall when there's a good chance Willis and/or Pickett will be there at 9...plus, they're already short on picks because of the insane Jamal Adams trade, so it's not like they're suddenly swimming in high draft picks.  I could see them giving up one of their seconds to move up a few slots if a QB they like is there, though...   

Posted
26 minutes ago, Process said:

Odds to win Superbowl before

Bills +700

Chiefs +750

 

After

Bills +700

Chiefs +850

 

More competition in the West is better for the Bills.

 

Eh I don't agree that this is good for the Bills. Denver has a really good roster that was only missing a QB. They are immediate Super Bowl contenders with this move and they're in our conference. The path to the Super Bowl just got a little harder.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
1 minute ago, The Jokeman said:

Especially with Wilson being 33 years old. I mean Denver still has some good players but that's a lot to give up. 

 

Are you saying this as though Wilson is old?  33 is pretty young for NFL QBs who actually bother to take care of themselves nowadays... and Wilson does just that.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

Absolutely.  Right now things are setting up for Buffalo and Josh Allen similarly to how it was set up for Brady and the Patriots for years.  Buffalo is playing in the 2nd worst division in the AFC (AFC South is pretty obviously the worst) and Buffalo is more dominant than the most dominant team in the AFC South (Titans?  Colts?).

 

Without any offseason moves at this point and knowing that our opponents next season are the AFC North (now minus Big Ben and Cleveland is still a mess) and NFC North (possibly the weakest NFC conference) and at this moment I wonder if the Vegas needle has moved from Kansas City to Buffalo for next season as far as who wins the AFC and Super Bowl.

It did a bit .

Edited by RoyBatty is alive
Posted
1 minute ago, HappyDays said:

 

Eh I don't agree that this is good for the Bills. Denver has a really good roster that was only missing a QB. They are immediate Super Bowl contenders with this move and they're in our conference. The path to the Super Bowl just got a little harder.

 

The West is gonna beat itself up though. It is bad news for us in 2023 when we play that division...... for 2022 I agree with those who say this makes KC's route to hosting us again in the playoffs considerably harder. 

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
32 minutes ago, FilthyBeast said:

 

Agree, and I wonder if Pete Carroll decides to jump ship opening up another vacancy all of a sudden.

 

Either way their run and window was over and a full blown rebuild will be underway in Seattle now.

He has a history of "jumping the ship." Just ask USC fans. Guy is a real narcissist.

  • Like (+1) 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...