Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

With the McKenzie signing, an Engram signing actually makes more sense. It could be like a slot job share between the two. Engram can play outside too. Is McKenzie at 4 mil plus Engram at 9 million better than Kirk at 15? I don’t know. But I like Engram, who like McKenzie ran a 4.42 at 6-3, 240. I really have no problem adding him, but I would be upset if it keeps us from signing Knox long term. 

Posted (edited)
21 minutes ago, njbuff said:

 

 

And Giant fans aren't in a position to be laughing at anyone.

All that needs to be said

Edited by CNY315
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, SCBills said:


I’m actually really high on Engram.  
 

Shouldn’t break the bank and he could be a monster in this offense.  

 

Engram would be absolutely amazing here.  Talent to spare.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, MrEpsYtown said:

With the McKenzie signing, an Engram signing actually makes more sense. It could be like a slot job share between the two. Engram can play outside too. Is McKenzie at 4 mil plus Engram at 9 million better than Kirk at 15? I don’t know. But I like Engram, who like McKenzie ran a 4.42 at 6-3, 240. I really have no problem adding him, but I would be upset if it keeps us from signing Knox long term. 


I don’t see any way Knox is not a long term Bill. 
 

Engram would basically give us a TE2/Slot to pair with McKenzie as Gadget/Slot.  
 

Dorsey could have a lot fun with a TE2 in 12 personnel who can line up in-line, then flex to the slot, with a slot who can flex to the backfield.

 

Edited by SCBills
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, MrEpsYtown said:

With the McKenzie signing, an Engram signing actually makes more sense. It could be like a slot job share between the two. Engram can play outside too. Is McKenzie at 4 mil plus Engram at 9 million better than Kirk at 15? I don’t know. But I like Engram, who like McKenzie ran a 4.42 at 6-3, 240. I really have no problem adding him, but I would be upset if it keeps us from signing Knox long term. 

 

 

$4M for a 178 yard receiver McKenzie and $9M for a 400 yard receiver Engram.............yeah Buffalo would be getting bargains because of Josh Allen. :lol:

Posted
Just now, BADOLBILZ said:

 

 

$4M for a 178 yard receiver McKenzie and $9M for a 400 yard receiver Engram.............yeah Buffalo would be getting bargains because of Josh Allen. :lol:

 

McKenzie isn't actually costing us $4 million this year. Let's what the real numbers look like before jumping to conclusions.

Posted
1 minute ago, recovery96 said:

Yup, let’s have 2 TE that drop the ball, brilliant.

the dudes talent is undeniable. im not saying we can fix it, but we have a better coaching staff than we ever have before... if we think a change of scenery and a diff coaching staff can fix him, than i trust the process. knox came a long way last year... and hes come a long way since draft (where he had 0 td catches in college).

 

if we pass im cool with it, and if we sign him ill be cautiously optimistic we think we can tailor a game plan for him, and coach him up

Posted
7 minutes ago, SCBills said:


I don’t see any way Knox is not a long term Bill. 
 

Engram would basically give us a TE2/Slot to pair with McKenzie as Gadget/Slot.  
 

Dorsey could have a lot fun with a TE2 in 12 personnel who can line up in-line, then flex to the slot, with a slot who can flex to the backfield.

 

 

Have you seen him play for the Giants?

Posted
4 minutes ago, recovery96 said:

Yup, let’s have 2 TE’s that consistently drop the ball, brilliant.

 

Did you watch Knox take a huge step last season or no?

Posted

Am I missing something? What does Engram bring that Knox does not?

 

I've been critical of Rambo in the past, but didn't he have a good season? I  feel like this money better is spent elsewhere. 

Posted
7 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

 

$4M for a 178 yard receiver McKenzie and $9M for a 400 yard receiver Engram.............yeah Buffalo would be getting bargains because of Josh Allen. :lol:

McKenzie only played about 20-30% of the offensive plays (that’ll go way up this year) and you’re ignoring his end arounds. Engram had Jake Fromm passing to him on the times and really low end qbs otherwise. Also I don’t think he gets anywhere near $9m a year 

  • Like (+1) 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...