Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 3/8/2022 at 12:15 PM, Stank_Nasty said:

Seriously? 

Expand  

I mean he’s got a point. Not many FA out there that instill excitement that could single handedly pull ticket sales. Chandler Jones? 

Now maybe if we pull a trade like Mack or Saquan people might flock. 
 

Mario Williams esque players are the only ones that create big splashes. 

Posted
  On 3/8/2022 at 12:18 PM, Coach Tuesday said:

Splash offseason:

 

Sign Kirk and Gronk

Trade the first for McCaffrey and use him as a hybrid slot receiver 

 

Tickets will be sold.

 

Expand  

 

This is where I am. A trade for McCaffrey or Mack would be the big splash tradewise.  Gronk would be the big splash free agent wise. I love Brandon Scherff, but signing a right guard is not a big splash. Neither is signing Chandler Jones imo. Maybe Von Miller. 

Posted
  On 3/8/2022 at 12:50 PM, MrEpsYtown said:

 

This is where I am. A trade for McCaffrey or Mack would be the big splash tradewise.  Gronk would be the big splash free agent wise. I love Brandon Scherff, but signing a right guard is not a big splash. Neither is signing Chandler Jones imo. Maybe Von Miller. 

Expand  

Landing McCaffrey would absolutely be a splash move, and so would a Mack signing. 
 

Only WR I consider a splash would be Adams. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
  On 3/8/2022 at 12:50 PM, MrEpsYtown said:

 

This is where I am. A trade for McCaffrey or Mack would be the big splash tradewise.  Gronk would be the big splash free agent wise. I love Brandon Scherff, but signing a right guard is not a big splash. Neither is signing Chandler Jones imo. Maybe Von Miller. 

Expand  


To be clear I’m not saying they should do this, I’m just painting a picture of what a possible “splash” offseason spending spree would look like.

 

Agree re Chandler Jones.  As for Von Miller, not sure where he fits into this defense and they don’t have $20M to pay him given their other needs.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
  On 3/8/2022 at 12:56 PM, Coach Tuesday said:


To be clear I’m not saying they should do this, I’m just painting a picture of what a possible “splash” offseason spending spree would look like.

 

Agree re Chandler Jones.  As for Von Miller, not sure where he fits into this defense and they don’t have $20M to pay him given their other needs.

Expand  

 

Agreed that those are the "splash" moves out there, not necessarily the right ones. But no one cares about Allen Robinson etc. 

Posted
  On 3/8/2022 at 12:24 PM, Greg S said:

Per today's Daily News the Jets are expected to release WR Jamison Crowder. Any interest?

Expand  

Yes. Replaces Beasely and has more twitch/YAC ability.

  On 3/8/2022 at 12:50 PM, MrEpsYtown said:

 

This is where I am. A trade for McCaffrey or Mack would be the big splash tradewise.  Gronk would be the big splash free agent wise. I love Brandon Scherff, but signing a right guard is not a big splash. Neither is signing Chandler Jones imo. Maybe Von Miller. 

Expand  

Khalil Mack would be a trade but yes definitely a big splash 

Posted
  On 3/8/2022 at 11:04 AM, FieldGeneral said:

Not trying to be a wise guy, but what free agents outside of Adams is a big name splash signing? Don't believe there is one that can lesson the nearly $1 billion public funded sticker shock. 

Expand  

This is not a good take. There are a BUNCH of splash players in this free agency class. Try harder…

  On 3/8/2022 at 12:47 PM, IronMaidenBills said:

I mean he’s got a point. Not many FA out there that instill excitement that could single handedly pull ticket sales. Chandler Jones? 

Now maybe if we pull a trade like Mack or Saquan people might flock. 
 

Mario Williams esque players are the only ones that create big splashes. 

Expand  

We are on the verge of winning it all. We have an insanely talented roster. People are gonna “flock” already…

Posted (edited)
  On 3/8/2022 at 1:24 PM, whorlnut said:

This is not a good take. There are a BUNCH of splash players in this free agency class. Try harder…

We are on the verge of winning it all. We have an insanely talented roster. People are gonna “flock” already…

Expand  

Of course people are going to come. But the article implies that Pegs wants to bring a “big splash” player to give extra incentive to help swallow the increased prices. Since a new stadium isn’t here yet, I’d imagine such a signing would be a very long term one, like 4 or 5 years.

 

Only players that fit that definition are CMC, Barkley, and Mack. Adams would be a splash move, but not likely a long term contract given his age. 

Edited by IronMaidenBills
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
  On 3/8/2022 at 2:12 PM, BuffaloRebound said:

Gronk would be biggest splash signing by far to the average fan.  

Expand  

No, that isn’t splashy enough. While it’s a good signing, that isn’t bringing any more excitement than we’ve already been experiencing. 
Mack, CMC, and Barkley all bring that “It’s on like Donkey Kong” vibe. Gronk isn’t exactly that. 

Posted
  On 3/8/2022 at 2:16 PM, IronMaidenBills said:

No, that isn’t splashy enough. While it’s a good signing, that isn’t bringing any more excitement than we’ve already been experiencing. 
Mack, CMC, and Barkley all bring that “It’s on like Donkey Kong” vibe. Gronk isn’t exactly that. 

Expand  

 

Given Barkley's injuries I wouldn't call him a big time signing. This isn't Penn St Barkley anymore.

  • Disagree 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
  On 3/8/2022 at 2:16 PM, IronMaidenBills said:

No, that isn’t splashy enough. While it’s a good signing, that isn’t bringing any more excitement than we’ve already been experiencing. 
Mack, CMC, and Barkley all bring that “It’s on like Donkey Kong” vibe. Gronk isn’t exactly that. 

Expand  

Disagree.  Gronk is probably top 5 most recognizable player to the average fan.  And in Buffalo, it’s probably Josh, Brady, Rodgers, Gronk, Mahomes in that order.  

Posted
  On 3/8/2022 at 2:28 PM, BuffaloRebound said:

Disagree.  Gronk is probably top 5 most recognizable player to the average fan.  And in Buffalo, it’s probably Josh, Brady, Rodgers, Gronk, Mahomes in that order.  

Expand  


While I wouldn’t hate a Gronk acquisition. He doesn’t exactly give us much more than we already have with Knox. I feel like money elsewhere would help the team more. 

  • Disagree 1
Posted
  On 3/8/2022 at 2:30 PM, IronMaidenBills said:


While I wouldn’t hate a Gronk acquisition. He doesn’t exactly give us much more than we already have with Knox. I feel like money elsewhere would help the team more. 

Expand  

Gronk would be a good signing and wouldn’t cost a lot.   He helps us in run game and in the red zone.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
  On 3/8/2022 at 2:30 PM, IronMaidenBills said:


While I wouldn’t hate a Gronk acquisition. He doesn’t exactly give us much more than we already have with Knox. I feel like money elsewhere would help the team more. 

Expand  

I disagree. Gronk is an elite blocker. He would benefit this offense in ways that go beyond pass catching. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
  On 3/8/2022 at 2:27 PM, IronMaidenBills said:

So who would you consider Big time for a realistic trade or FA acquisition? 

Expand  

 

Gronk. He is someone we could realistically get and at a decent price. I would love to get Von Miller but I don't think it works for us cap wise.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
  On 3/8/2022 at 12:18 PM, Coach Tuesday said:

Splash offseason:

 

Sign Kirk and Gronk

Trade the first for McCaffrey and use him as a hybrid slot receiver 

 

Tickets will be sold.

 

Expand  


I love this but I’d like to trade for Saquan Barkley of McCaffrey. Would be a lethal offense if we get some OL help in the draft. 

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...