Jump to content

January 6th 2021 FEDSURRECTION:The Corrupt Biden Regime. Trump "most likely" to pardon J6ers day one


Recommended Posts

Posted

How many informants among the Proud Boys on J6? Surely this judge will not allow that question to be answered.

 

Seems relevant. If you're not a commie that is. 

 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted

The Democrat-Media Insurrection Myth

by Richard McDonough

FTA:

 

There were two events recently that were met with considerable hysteria by what remains of the Democrat party and their stenographers in what passes for our “news” media.  

First, the purchase of Twitter by Elon Musk, who promised to restore freedom of speech there.  

Second, Tucker Carlson’s release of the videos of the Capitol riot that took place on the Jan. 6, 2021 given him by Republican Speaker of the House, Kevin McCarthy. 

 

The reasons for the hysteria in Liberal Land over both of these positive developments is that the Democrat-Media Collusion Team has been in charge of virtually all institutions since Jan. 6, 2021 and they had painted a picture of the events at the Capitol Jan. 6 that would further solidify their own wealth and power.  The Democrat-Media Collusion Team, the self-described great defenders of our democracy, cannot not abide any such positive democratic developments.  Imagine what the serfs might think if the government or “news media” actually told them the truth for a change!  It’s absolutely terrifying.

 

This is not speculation because Liz Cheney, whose father’s performance as vice-president  was strongly criticized by Trump long before Trump became president, was not bright enough to refrain from stating well before her alleged House “investigation” was completed that it was her aim to prevent Trump from getting elected again.  Seething revenge does not tend to help one either to see things clearly or to keep one’s big mouth shut.  Thanks Liz!

 

The storyline put together by what passes for our news media is that Trump led an armed insurrection on Jan. 6, 2021 that necessitated a House Committee investigation of what happened that day (actually for the political motive to recommend Trump for an indictment in advance of the 2024 election).  The media’s job, including CNN, MSNBC, and most newspapers was to refer confidently to “the Jan. 6 insurrection” as if that were a settled fact already in the history books. 

 

What passes for our news media did not say that some people believe it was an insurrection and others believe it was only a riot by some buffoons and then present the facts and let the peasants decide what they thought about the matter.  No, what passes for our news media needed to state the conclusion of that “investigation” long before it was completed. 

 

The reaction to Carlson’s videos (what used to be called “evidence” in the old days before the adolescent revolutionaries took over most of our institutions), was panic.  Comrade Schumer angrily took to the floor of the Senate to call Carlson’s act of journalism “disgraceful” and call for Fox News to censor him.  It is now “disgraceful” to give any evidence to the peasants not authorized by the Democrats.  For, even though what remains of our “educational system” no longer teaches the proles to think for themselves, it is in the nature of the human spirit that a few of them will do it anyways and see through the smokescreen. 

 

More: https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2023/03/the_democratmedia_insurrection_myth.html

 

 

.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
9 hours ago, B-Man said:

The reasons for the hysteria in Liberal Land over both of these positive developments is that the Democrat-Media Collusion Team has been in charge of virtually all institutions since Jan. 6, 2021 and they had painted a picture of the events at the Capitol Jan. 6 that would further solidify their own wealth and power.  The Democrat-Media Collusion Team, the self-described great defenders of our democracy, cannot not abide any such positive democratic developments.  Imagine what the serfs might think if the government or “news media” actually told them the truth for a change!  It’s absolutely terrifying.

 

This is not speculation because Liz Cheney, whose father’s performance as vice-president  was strongly criticized by Trump long before Trump became president, was not bright enough to refrain from stating well before her alleged House “investigation” was completed that it was her aim to prevent Trump from getting elected again.  Seething revenge does not tend to help one either to see things clearly or to keep one’s big mouth shut.  Thanks Liz!

Batshite crazy...Liz Cheney sacrificed her political ambitions to stop trump for re election.  Now why would she do that?  And how did the insurrection solidify anyones wealth other than possibly trump thru grifting?

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Those upstanding citizens who tried to burn down a federal courthouse night after night? Meh.

 

Those responsible all across the country and in DC for burning businesses, churches etc.? Meh.

 

But getting grandma 2+ years later is a huge win for the US gestapo!

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, BillsFanNC said:

 


Oh ok lol - lmao - sounds like the snitch got caught.
 

The informant told jurors that his relationship with the FBI began around 2008 and investigators didn’t ask him to join the Proud Boys or direct him to gather information about the group. The FBI also didn’t ask him to go to Washington on Jan. 6 or march with the Proud Boys that day, he said.

 

The informant, however, who joined the Proud Boys in 2019, said he wasn’t a group leader and didn’t know any Tarrio or any of the other leaders on trial. He was not in any of the Telegram chats the Proud Boys leaders on trial are accused of using to plot in the days leading up to Jan. 6.


Capitol riot: FBI informant testifies for Proud Boys defense

 

Someone is lying - lmao - will be interesting to see how this one pans out.

 

image.thumb.jpeg.39dbb07dda00f90450cf6398662c6a00.jpeg

 

Freaking losers 

  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

Was always a sham.  January 6 is a sham.  
 

 

 

 

Interesting.  Very, very interesting.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Big Blitz said:

Was always a sham.  January 6 is a sham.  
 

 

 

A sham. an expensive Political action for an election. and it broke people.  maybe they were already broke. just look at the pro J6 comments in this thread. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

A sham. an expensive Political action for an election. and it broke people.  maybe they were already broke. just look at the pro J6 comments in this thread. 

 

the great news is that if the DA did hold video evidence that ultimately got him out of prison im sure he can/will sue and we all can pay for the corruption as whoever responsible gets shuffled to a new highly paid position. 

 

how many on here were angry about tuckers story aka were perfectly fine with the gov convicting a person under false and illegal pretenses? yikes. truley dark stuff.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...