Jump to content

January 6th 2021 FEDSURRECTION:The Corrupt Biden Regime. Trump "most likely" to pardon J6ers day one


Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

because we've seen how well some Americans can discern and collate data...

 

 

I win my (personal) bet.

 

I knew that you would give the Leftist line.

 

I have a little more faith in Americans I guess.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

because we've seen how well some Americans can discern and collate data...

Obviously a lot better than you. You seriously suck at analyzing data.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Westside said:

Obviously a lot better than you. You seriously suck at analyzing data.

Several journal editors disagree.  But I suppose they're all worthless leftist, elitist losers to you.

btw, can we discuss why being elite is bad?  Were you happier when the Bills won a couple of games a year or USA wins 1 or 2 gold medals in the Winter Olympics?

Edited by redtail hawk
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Westside said:

Liberal hacks you chumps use as journalists. What a joke. Try harder. 

Yes, we need to to overcome the pigheadedness of the right.  Rectum? they all most killed em during the pandemic.  I guess evolution in real time is good tho.

"Knowledge is bad.  And the pursuit of knowledge is worse"?

Edited by redtail hawk
  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
1 minute ago, redtail hawk said:

Yes, we need to to overcome the pigheadedness of the right.  Rectum? they all most killed em during the pandemic.  I guess evolution in real time is good tho.

Maybe someday the left will evolve into adults. Not the spoiled brats they are today.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

maybe someday, many on the right will evolve their brain above the brainstem.

And maybe you will only have one user name on here, tibs. Lol

 😂 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

Several journal editors disagree.  But I suppose they're all worthless leftist, elitist losers to you.

btw, can we discuss why being elite is bad?  Were you happier when the Bills won a couple of games a year or USA wins 1 or 2 gold medals in the Winter Olympics?

Thats not even a good logical fallacy. 

 

come on, you can do better

 

 

1 minute ago, Westside said:

And maybe you will only have one user name on here, tibs. Lol

 😂 

Shoot. maybe one of these days it can provide an example of this high intelligence and journalistic writing style.

 

Cause right now, its reading like a child having a tantrum.

 

Wait till it presents the certificate proving the high intelligence. And make sure to ignore where it's signed by mom

 

 

Posted
25 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

Several journal editors disagree.  But I suppose they're all worthless leftist, elitist losers to you.

btw, can we discuss why being elite is bad?  Were you happier when the Bills won a couple of games a year or USA wins 1 or 2 gold medals in the Winter Olympics?

Who gets to decide who’s elite? Do you? Do I?

This isn’t a game. This is people’s life you’re messing with. No one is any better than anyone else. 
That’s the lefts problem. They think they are better than everyone and should be able to tell others how to live, eat, breath and think.

 

They don’t do it because they care(the left) they do it because they look down on anyone who disagrees with them. Very shallow and insecure people in the progressive movement.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted (edited)

they do. they just usually don't say that quiet part outload.

 

and why they seem to revert to FED authority to take care of all them Dumb Americans that need them to "white knight" them.

 

And anyone that disagrees with them, are even dumber Americans.

 

 

 

 

Edited by Chris farley
Posted
12 minutes ago, Westside said:

Who gets to decide who’s elite? Do you? Do I?

This isn’t a game. This is people’s life you’re messing with. No one is any better than anyone else. 
That’s the lefts problem. They think they are better than everyone and should be able to tell others how to live, eat, breath and think.

 

They don’t do it because they care(the left) they do it because they look down on anyone who disagrees with them. Very shallow and insecure people in the progressive movement.

 

 

In economies, the market decides. It’s now a global market. 
 

in sports its usually the score although sadly sometimes the Russian judge decides 

 

competition is another foundational element of our society. Sadly, it’s becoming accepted to cheat if one doesn’t actually win

  • Eyeroll 1
Posted

Nothing in today's markets or global markets are free or non-manipulated by state regulations, trade deals, and the whims of highly funded PACS

 

Do you blame russians when the bills or sabers loose as well?

 

the last one is all 1980.  progressives have taught us that its about participation, not competition.  

 

and never mind the hordes that believe victimhood is a commodity. 

Posted
31 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

Nothing in today's markets or global markets are free or non-manipulated by state regulations, trade deals, and the whims of highly funded PACS

 

Do you blame russians when the bills or sabers loose as well?

 

the last one is all 1980.  progressives have taught us that its about participation, not competition.  

 

and never mind the hordes that believe victimhood is a commodity. 

If there were zero regulations, a physicist would still garner more compensation than a farm worker. Life is largely a competition albeit not fair: genetics and circumstance play huge roles. Once that premise is accepted, it becomes easier to understand the position of living wage for all workers 

Posted
1 hour ago, redtail hawk said:

I have no problem with the release of more evidence provided the R's form a concrete conclusion on the causes of Jan 6, just as the committee did and address Trump's involvement or lack thereof.

Some Rs have already made a declaration on the work done by the 1/6 committee, which is appropriate. 

 

The footage being released is simply that—footage being released.  I can’t think of any reason you would need assurances of anything beyond that.   

Posted
4 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Some Rs have already made a declaration on the work done by the 1/6 committee, which is appropriate. 

 

The footage being released is simply that—footage being released.  I can’t think of any reason you would need assurances of anything beyond that.   

The reason is that nothing happens in a vacuum.  Context is extremely important.  But I'm eager to see the footage.

Posted
4 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Some Rs have already made a declaration on the work done by the 1/6 committee, which is appropriate. 

 

The footage being released is simply that—footage being released.  I can’t think of any reason you would need assurances of anything beyond that.   

 

I can.

 

He's for it if it will vindicate the lefts narrative.

 

Against it if it doesn't. 

Just now, redtail hawk said:

The reason is that nothing happens in a vacuum.  Context is extremely important.  But I'm eager to see the footage.

 

You realize that the remainder of the 14k hours of footage will provide context to the cherry picked clips we've only been allowed to see up until now, right?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Chris farley said:

Nothing in today's markets or global markets are free or non-manipulated by state regulations, trade deals, and the whims of highly funded PACS

 

Do you blame russians when the bills or sabers loose as well?

 

the last one is all 1980.  progressives have taught us that its about participation, not competition.  

 

and never mind the hordes that believe victimhood is a commodity. 

I was responding on a phone and missed some of this.  The russian reference was re sports like diving, skating, gymnastics etc.  Not sure you got that.  Did you ever feel their scores were biased?

 

Inequality begins at birth.  It is not coincidence that successful people marry attractive, successful people (competitively) and then have successful, attractive children (altho currently many fewer).  It's self perpetuating and will remain that way.  See, Sociology is a worthwhile pursuit.

7 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

I can.

 

He's for it if it will vindicate the lefts narrative.

 

Against it if it doesn't. 

 

You realize that the remainder of the 14k hours of footage will provide context to the cherry picked clips we've only been allowed to see up until now, right?

Perhaps.  Let's see if they are cherry picked.

Edited by redtail hawk
  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

I was responding on a phone and missed some of this.  The russian reference was re sports like diving, skating, gymnastics etc.  Not sure you got that.  Did you ever feel their scores were biased?

 

Inequality begins at birth.  It is not coincidence that successful people marry attractive, successful people (competitively) and then have successful, attractive children (altho currently many fewer).  It's self perpetuating and will remain that way.  See, Sociology is a worthwhile pursuit.

Perhaps.  Let's see if they are cherry picked.

 

 

We already know the J6 committee used edited video during their hearings.

 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 2
×
×
  • Create New...