BillsFanNC Posted February 22, 2023 Author Posted February 22, 2023 Security risk!!!!! Except when it wasn't. 1 1
BillsFanNC Posted February 22, 2023 Author Posted February 22, 2023 InSuhRecKshUn!!! I wonder why this clip didn't make the prime time hearings? 2
BillStime Posted February 23, 2023 Posted February 23, 2023 29 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: InSuhRecKshUn!!! I wonder why this clip didn't make the prime time hearings? You couldn’t put that in the Julie Kelly follies thread? lolz
BillStime Posted February 23, 2023 Posted February 23, 2023 C’mon DR - have the courage to fight! Do the right thing!
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted February 23, 2023 Posted February 23, 2023 15 hours ago, BillStime said: C’mon DR - have the courage to fight! Do the right thing! Quick billsy come up with an orginal thought.....oh wait just regurgitate random Twitter accounts for validation nice!
BillStime Posted February 23, 2023 Posted February 23, 2023 4 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Quick billsy come up with an orginal thought.....oh wait just regurgitate random Twitter accounts for validation nice! What are things simps would never say to their master for $500, Alex? V
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted February 23, 2023 Posted February 23, 2023 1 minute ago, BillStime said: What are things simps would never say to their master for $500, Alex? V I didn't vote for trump, once again your as bright as a cardboard box. Your the biggest simp for the democratic party but please keep trying
BillStime Posted February 23, 2023 Posted February 23, 2023 5 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: I didn't vote for trump, once again your as bright as a cardboard box. Your the biggest simp for the democratic party but please keep trying Never said you did precious
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted February 23, 2023 Posted February 23, 2023 4 minutes ago, BillStime said: Never said you did precious So how is he my master? Precious?
BillStime Posted February 23, 2023 Posted February 23, 2023 Just now, AlBUNDY4TDS said: So how is he my master? Precious? How is who?
daz28 Posted February 23, 2023 Posted February 23, 2023 When is Tucker going to show us the parts of the Jan 6th security footage he thinks we should be privileged enough to see? Does he have a security clearance that the rest of us don't have? If not, why wasn't it all made public?
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted February 23, 2023 Posted February 23, 2023 21 minutes ago, BillStime said: How is who? You talk in circles so much you have trouble following yourself wtf lol take a break.
BillsFanNC Posted February 23, 2023 Author Posted February 23, 2023 1 hour ago, daz28 said: When is Tucker going to show us the parts of the Jan 6th security footage he thinks we should be privileged enough to see? Does he have a security clearance that the rest of us don't have? If not, why wasn't it all made public? Two years of the footage being kept under lock and key from everyone but J6 committee members who selectively shared what they deemed necessary and only NOW do you take issue? While I agree that it all should be available for the people to see, this take is as comical as it gets. 1
BillsFanNC Posted February 23, 2023 Author Posted February 23, 2023 One of the J6 protesters who was right next to one of the flash bangs immediately went into cardiac arrest and died. But nevermind that. Because officer Sicknick was bludgeoned with a fire extinguisher dontcha know? 1 1
daz28 Posted February 23, 2023 Posted February 23, 2023 (edited) 3 hours ago, BillsFanNC said: Two years of the footage being kept under lock and key from everyone but J6 committee members who selectively shared what they deemed necessary and only NOW do you take issue? While I agree that it all should be available for the people to see, this take is as comical as it gets. So you're trying to accuse both of us of hypocrisy, because only one of us has actually admitted it? I'm also kind of not real happy about the government COLLUDING with the media, with a man who's reputation isn't to be taken seriously(his lawyers argued it), and who has been proven to pushed false narratives, to censor what I can see. That would make it 2 hypocrisy's for the price of one. 😁 Edited February 23, 2023 by daz28
BillsFanNC Posted February 23, 2023 Author Posted February 23, 2023 59 minutes ago, daz28 said: So you're trying to accuse both of us of hypocrisy, because only one of us has actually admitted it? I'm also kind of not real happy about the government COLLUDING with the media, with a man who's reputation isn't to be taken seriously(his lawyers argued it), and who has been proven to pushed false narratives, to censor what I can see. That would make it 2 hypocrisy's for the price of one. 😁 No just you. I've been consistent. The tapes should have been made available as soon as the "investigation" was started. Were you calling for them to be released then? I was. So now TC has them. A talk show opinion guy. Not unlike any of the other talk show opinion personalities who are about ratings first and foremost. And here you are taking issue with it. While I said then and now to release them all. Only one hypocrite here. Look in the mirror. 1
daz28 Posted February 23, 2023 Posted February 23, 2023 (edited) 47 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: No just you. I've been consistent. The tapes should have been made available as soon as the "investigation" was started. Were you calling for them to be released then? I was. So now TC has them. A talk show opinion guy. Not unlike any of the other talk show opinion personalities who are about ratings first and foremost. And here you are taking issue with it. While I said then and now to release them all. Only one hypocrite here. Look in the mirror. You were the one who supposed, and failed to address my question. Why did the government provide this to Tucker, and not its citizens? Why didn't THEY go over it, and release findings to the public?? You know their jobs??? If we're not allowed to see them, and only be fed what Fox news wants us to see/hear, then the government is using media to CENSOR us. Now if you want to just attempt to pick this apart with a partisan political answer, go ahead, but it sure does make it look a lot like hypocrisy. PS, I already know you wanted them released, but that's not the question I'm asking. Edited February 23, 2023 by daz28
BillsFanNC Posted February 24, 2023 Author Posted February 24, 2023 1 hour ago, daz28 said: You were the one who supposed, and failed to address my question. Why did the government provide this to Tucker, and not its citizens? Why didn't THEY go over it, and release findings to the public?? You know their jobs??? If we're not allowed to see them, and only be fed what Fox news wants us to see/hear, then the government is using media to CENSOR us. Now if you want to just attempt to pick this apart with a partisan political answer, go ahead, but it sure does make it look a lot like hypocrisy. PS, I already know you wanted them released, but that's not the question I'm asking. Again. Are you friggin serious? Why haven't you been curious enough to ask these questions for the past TWO YEARS? When the democrat controlled congress could have released them in full at any time? This absolutely is not the ideal way to release the footage as I keep saying. But something tells me that if a republican controlled congress, TC or any entity not aligned with leftist media released the footage, then it will be met with skepticism by leftists regardless. Why weren't you asking for transparency two years ago? Stop ignoring the question.
daz28 Posted February 24, 2023 Posted February 24, 2023 5 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: Again. Are you friggin serious? Why haven't you been curious enough to ask these questions for the past TWO YEARS? When the democrat controlled congress could have released them in full at any time? This absolutely is not the ideal way to release the footage as I keep saying. But something tells me that if a republican controlled congress, TC or any entity not aligned with leftist media released the footage, then it will be met with skepticism by leftists regardless. Why weren't you asking for transparency two years ago? Stop ignoring the question. I'm always for transparency, but here's the catch. This investigation was SUPPOSED to be about Capital security. Well, instead of maybe, you know, reviewing the footage, and finding ways to have better security, they shipped it off to Tucker Calson and God knows who else. They can't have it both ways. Either we should see it, or it remains a Capital security issue. It can't be both. Please stop making this discussion about me, because it's not.
Recommended Posts