Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

     I’m surprised this thread hasn’t been started.

     We all have heard the allegations that Miami’s owner Ross was offering Flores $100k a loss to tank.

     The NFL should not be in bed with Casinos or online betting sites such as Fan duel. It immediately causes a bad look due to the appearance of conflicting interests. I didn’t research the numbers but it must be in the hundreds of millions in advertising revenue. 
     Then there is the fact that a group of 32 billionaires refuse to employ professional referees. If you own 1 billion you are filthy rich. And yet, the league has refused to hire these guys on full time. It isn’t a money issue. That makes zero sense.

     If Ross was willing to proposition his coach to lose ( I get that the proof isn’t there but tell me it doesn’t sound plausible) why wouldn’t he or other powers that be not be willing to slip a few shekels to a dirty ref or three?

      I’m not say it happened. But, there is a saying a teacher of mine had: “ It doesn’t just have to be right, it has to look right.”

      There have been multiple threads on here over the years talking about the fix being in. Many on here poopoo it because it seems insane.

     Which brings me to my final point:

     What would it look like if you were going to throw a game from a coaching perspective?

      Run a bunch of low percentage plays and punt while shackling your best player(s)?  Make absolutely befuddling and egregious decisions that are completely indefensible?

     I haven’t personally believed that the fix was in in a conspiracy level way  in the past. I’m not saying I do now. But, for the first time the dots are starting to connect themselves and picture coming together isn’t a pretty or even palatable one.

 

Flame away Ladies and Gentlemen 

  • Like (+1) 8
  • Eyeroll 1
  • Agree 4
  • Awesome! (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
  • Dislike 1
Posted

This stuff is completely out of bounds and can't possibly happen right up until it does.  I don't have a hard time at all believing Flores here.  Money talks, bs walks. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted

I completely agree. While it may not be true yet, opportunities are clearly presented for many to benefit by predetermining outcomes, if only in subtle less noticeable ways.  Now, maybe this has been going on for years and we're only realizing it now due to the involvement of gambling in sports, but I suspect you can't keep impropriety from the game anymore. One or several bad actors will clearly be involved at some level. And truthfully, the owners themselves may be at the root of it all.

Posted (edited)

So the league manipulates outcomes for what end? If you think that an owner like Jerry Jones is okay with his team losing for 2 decades because it's part of a greater plan then you are crazy. 

Edited by dma0034
  • Like (+1) 3
  • Disagree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

Improper game specific scheming and intentionally poor play calling at critical moments would be the easiest ways to throw a game unless you include paying off a player to do so.  A critical INT, fumble, missed kick, blown coverage, etc. would do the trick in most games. 

Posted
14 minutes ago, Buffalo Boy said:

     I’m surprised this thread hasn’t been started.

     We all have heard the allegations that Miami’s owner Ross was offering Flores $100k a loss to tank.

     The NFL should not be in bed with Casinos or online betting sites such as Fan duel. It immediately causes a bad look due to the appearance of conflicting interests. I didn’t research the numbers but it must be in the hundreds of millions in advertising revenue. 
     Then there is the fact that a group of 32 billionaires refuse to employ professional referees. If you own 1 billion you are filthy rich. And yet, the league has refused to hire these guys on full time. It isn’t a money issue. That makes zero sense.

     If Ross was willing to proposition his coach to lose ( I get that the proof isn’t there but tell me it doesn’t sound plausible) why wouldn’t he or other powers that be not be willing to slip a few shekels to a dirty ref or three?

      I’m not say it happened. But, there is a saying a teacher of mine had: “ It doesn’t just have to be right, it has to look right.”

      There have been multiple threads on here over the years talking about the fix being in. Many on here poopoo it because it seems insane.

     Which brings me to my final point:

     What would it look like if you were going to throw a game from a coaching perspective?

      Run a bunch of low percentage plays and punt while shackling your best player(s)?  Make absolutely befuddling and egregious decisions that are completely indefensible?

     I haven’t personally believed that the fix was in in a conspiracy level way  in the past. I’m not saying I do now. But, for the first time the dots are starting to connect themselves and picture coming together isn’t a pretty or even palatable one.

 

Flame away Ladies and Gentlemen 

 

Shekels? So who are you saying is behind the conspiracy?

  • Haha (+1) 4
Posted
6 minutes ago, dma0034 said:

So the league manipulates outcomes for what end? If you think that an owner like Jerry Jones is okay with his team losing for 2 decades because it's part of a greater plan than you are crazy. 

Logically speaking fixing specific games would not be in the best interest of the league.  Owners and people/institutions with gambling interests would absolutely have interest in manipulating individual games however.  The league would have interest in keeping games close so as to maximize viewership and revenue. You know, like all of the divisional and conference championship games were.

 

The economics involved in anything where huge sums of money are involved virtually always leads to some people cheating or gaming the system for a bigger chunk of it.  That’s just how the world really works.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Buffalo Boy said:

An owner with financial gambling interests offering his coach money to throw games allegations thread

 

 

that's already the subject of a very long thread right here on page one.  

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted

This stuff is completely nuts. You know it's not rigged BECAUSE of the money involved. The incentives just aren't there.

 

Even taking what Flores has said at face value, just look at what happened. Did he purposely lose for 100k? Hell no. Why would he? He's making millions of dollars because people think he can win football games. What possible motivation could he have to lose them? Certainly not for 100k, it would be irrational to do so even for millions since that's what you are already making legitimately.

 

If the NFL is involved in sports gambling they have an incentive to make sure it's fair. There business depends upon it.

 

Creating "professional" refs gives the refs power. It makes it harder to discipline and fire them. It would make it easier for a "pro" to entrench themselves and be corrupt.

 

Everything about this post is backwards.

  • Disagree 2
  • Agree 1
  • Dislike 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, dma0034 said:

So the league manipulates outcomes for what end? If you think that an owner like Jerry Jones is okay with his team losing for 2 decades because it's part of a greater plan then you are crazy. 

 

Maybe not the league per se, individual owners, coaches, whomever.  Degenerate gamblers make decisions that don't make sense to the rest of us

  • Agree 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...