Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
54 minutes ago, SCBills said:


Do you watch other TE’s?   Even Kittle, Kelce etc have drops.  Knox drastically improved that this year.  TE’s just aren’t as sure-handed all the time as WR’s.  
 

Diontae Johnson has games where he’s legitimately a liability.  Knox is nowhere close to that.  
 

Yes, keep Knox.  He’s a Top 10 TE, and is still improving. 
 

 

 

It's never a convincing argument when considering a mediocre player to say "even the best in the league make mistakes".

 

But, since you did, in the last 3 years:

 

Knox 18 drops on 165 targets for 10.9%.

 

Kelce 20 drops on a whopping 415 targets for 4.8% (averaging as many yards per season as Knox has in career total).

 

Kittle 10 drops on 264 targets for 3.8%.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, GoBills808 said:

That’s probably true. I just think Knox is being overrated in this thread.

 

Sure, but like any subject on this board you see a lot of over and under rating players.

 

If they can lock up Knox anywhere around $8M per that puts him as a good deal IMO.

Finding a Kelce or Kittle is more luck than skill and it seems to me trying to pursue that when gaging TEs is a fools errand.

Knox has the potential to be the best TE the Bills ever had (not that it's a big accomplishment) but you have to have a

TE that teams have to game plan on.  Keep him and draft a guy from the 4th on down and hope he can perform too.

Posted
1 minute ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

It's never a convincing argument when considering a mediocre player to say "even the best in the league make mistakes".

 

But, since you did, in the last 3 years:

 

Knox 18 drops on 165 targets for 10.9%.

 

Kelce 20 drops on a whopping 415 targets for 4.8% (averaging as many yards per season as Knox has in career total).

 

Kittle 10 drops on 264 targets for 3.8%.

 

 

 

Do you have his drop % for only this past year?

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

As someone who (like Hapless) has been quite critical of Knox previously, I'm now in the camp of him being worth re-signing.

 

The two simple reasons are his TDs, and his vastly improved blocking. In one of the games against the Cheats, he stone walled Judon on a number of occasions.

 

I think this season has seen him develop into a very serviceable, all round TE - and there's still room for improvement.

 

The biggest problem the Bills have in relation to Knox, is how much to pay him, as the TE 'market' is way messed up - largely due to the silly money the Cheats threw at Henry and Jonnu Smith, neither of which looked worth half of it.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Charles Romes said:

I think Beane will sign him up long term in the off-season to a reasonable contract in view of his production. 

 

FWIW the league just gave Knox a decent bump in pay for 2022 under the "Proven Performance Bonus" program.

Posted

He's the best TE the Bills have had since they played in the AFL.  Not sure what the question is.  He is a top 8 TE in this league.  Yes you pay him. 

They need a better TE #2.  Gilliam and Sweeney need to both go. They are roster bottom feeders.  Doyle or another OT is your blocking TE.  I would prefer a veteran as TE #2. The position takes a long time to learn.  

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
4 minutes ago, Ethan in Portland said:

He's the best TE the Bills have had since they played in the AFL.  Not sure what the question is.  He is a top 8 TE in this league.  Yes you pay him. 

They need a better TE #2.  Gilliam and Sweeney need to both go. They are roster bottom feeders.  Doyle or another OT is your blocking TE.  I would prefer a veteran as TE #2. The position takes a long time to learn.  

 

Sweeney will go to camp but they definitely need to bring in someone to displace him.

Gilliam's worth has to be tied to his FB play.  That being said bringing in a FB during camp to compete is something that I think should

be done.  Gilliam is way too short to be considered a TE.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

This was spurred by comments I made in the Gronk thread

 

Knox improved greatly this season, but did he improve enough?

 

When you look at his productivity per game, it's an improvement, but a smaller improvement than one might like to see

 

In 2020, he had 40.5 snaps per game. 

In 2021, he had 61.1 snaps per game (87% of offensive snaps)

That's a 51% increase in snaps per game.

 

In 2020, he had 2.2 receptions per game

In 2021, he had 3.3 receptions per game

That's a 50% increase in receptions per game

 

In 2020, he gained 24 yards per game

In 2021, he gained 39 yards per game

That's a 63% increase in yards per game

 

But the  bottom line - while 587 yds is much better productivity than 287 yds last year, his productivity in the passing game improved only slightly relative to the increased number of snaps he saw. 

 

I don't have a good sense as to how often he was used in the passing game (or open) relative to how much he was asked to block.

 

He improved in other ways, of course:

 

His catch % improved markedly, from 54.5% to 69%

So did his yards per target from 6.5 to 8.3

 

His drops stayed constant, 3, which means as a percentage of targets, they improved from 9.1% to 5.6%

Most critically - last year he had 2 fumbles.  This year he did not fumble.

 

I'm not Joe Expert, but to my perception his blocking showed a big improvement this season, as did his route running to the point where they actually were able to line him up as a receiver.  His physicality as a route runner improved markedly, as well.

 

How was he relative to other TE across the league?  I had to pull data from PFR and sort it myself to get this. 

 

Among TE, Knox was:

13th for Y/G with 39

14th for Y/Tgt with 8.3

15th for Y/R with 12

14th for 1D with 41

28th in Catch% (of TE with more than 25 targets) at 69%

Tied for 1st in TD with 9 (4 way tie)

 

So except in TDs, kind of middling

 

Obviously Knox has developed into a competent NFL TE who shows flashes of better.  And some of the above comparison is unfair, as it lumps him in with TE who are primarily WR while Knox is asked to block quite a bit.

 

This is Knox's contract year, and while I think he's worth the $2.7M he'll count against the cap in 2022, does his production merit a big payday?  Being the #12-18 TE would slot him in currently for an AAV around $6.5-8M AAV, or a contract between $16M and $29M

 

IMHO, this is reason to draft a young TE in what is supposed to be a deep TE draft class, because while Knox has improved, it seems to me that he has not yet become that Star TE we were hoping to draft and develop.  He has not become Allen's Kelce or Kittle or Andrews, or even Goeddert or Waller.  He is a good young TE, though.

 

Thoughts?

I would rather pay Knox than Edmunds…let’s put it that way.

 

I wouldn’t kind drafting another TE as well but there are some more pressing needs that the Bills have this season IMO

Edited by JohnNord
  • Like (+1) 2
Posted

Will he be Kelce Andrews Waller (basically a WR) Kittle Hock Goedert or Ertz - probably not.  What we definitely need is a better #2.  

 

He's in a tier right behind those guys.  He's also not quite at his ceiling yet.

 

He's fast.  Can block.  Has good chemistry with Josh.  

 

The offense needs a better version of McKenzie.  And a bigger WR for the red zone to round out your 5/6 guys - if Beasley and Sanders are gone.  Knox is the least of our concerns.  Because here is what we have so far:

 

 

Diggs

Davis

?

?

?

?

Knox/Sweeney 

Singletary 

 

Posted (edited)
41 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

Will he be Kelce Andrews Waller (basically a WR) Kittle Hock Goedert or Ertz - probably not.  What we definitely need is a better #2.  

 

He's in a tier right behind those guys.  He's also not quite at his ceiling yet.

 

He's fast.  Can block.  Has good chemistry with Josh.  

 

The offense needs a better version of McKenzie.  And a bigger WR for the red zone to round out your 5/6 guys - if Beasley and Sanders are gone.  Knox is the least of our concerns.  Because here is what we have so far:

 

 

Diggs

Davis

?

?

?

?

Knox/Sweeney 

Singletary 

 

 

The top tier is Kelce, Kittle, Waller and now Pitts.  Knox is the next tier, and towards the top end of it.

Edited by Doc
Posted
47 minutes ago, ColoradoBills said:

 

Sure, but like any subject on this board you see a lot of over and under rating players.

 

If they can lock up Knox anywhere around $8M per that puts him as a good deal IMO.

Finding a Kelce or Kittle is more luck than skill and it seems to me trying to pursue that when gaging TEs is a fools errand.

Knox has the potential to be the best TE the Bills ever had (not that it's a big accomplishment) but you have to have a

TE that teams have to game plan on.  Keep him and draft a guy from the 4th on down and hope he can perform too.

To the OP, yes, Knox has shown enough!  This is the process they speak of.  Draft a raw stud, develop him, and keep him.

 

And furthermore the smart teams extend before the contract is up.  Knox should be treated in the Josh/Tre category of working out the contract before they are done with their original one.  That is the advantage you have from drafting smart.  You can extend them at a fair price before they hit the open market.  They get money early and the Bills get a good improving player at market rate (and the market keeps going up).

 

To Colorado, the question will be what it will take.  I think Knox will be reasonable but Kroft got $6, Jonnu and Hunter got $12M.  Yes, if they can get him for $8 for several years, you take it.  I don't know if that is enough to get it done.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Einstein's Dog said:

To Colorado, the question will be what it will take.  I think Knox will be reasonable but Kroft got $6, Jonnu and Hunter got $12M.  Yes, if they can get him for $8 for several years, you take it.  I don't know if that is enough to get it done.

 

I don't know either.  I am hoping Knox and his agent go for a 3 year extension that works for both of them and the Bills.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Einstein's Dog said:

 

To Colorado, the question will be what it will take.  I think Knox will be reasonable but Kroft got $6, Jonnu and Hunter got $12M.  Yes, if they can get him for $8 for several years, you take it.  I don't know if that is enough to get it done.

Knowing this, think he would have to sue his agent for malpractice if he got him a $8M contract.

Posted
3 hours ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

This was spurred by comments I made in the Gronk thread

 

Knox improved greatly this season, but did he improve enough?

 

When you look at his productivity per game, it's an improvement, but a smaller improvement than one might like to see

 

In 2020, he had 40.5 snaps per game. 

In 2021, he had 61.1 snaps per game (87% of offensive snaps)

That's a 51% increase in snaps per game.

 

In 2020, he had 2.2 receptions per game

In 2021, he had 3.3 receptions per game

That's a 50% increase in receptions per game

 

In 2020, he gained 24 yards per game

In 2021, he gained 39 yards per game

That's a 63% increase in yards per game

 

But the  bottom line - while 587 yds is much better productivity than 287 yds last year, his productivity in the passing game improved only slightly relative to the increased number of snaps he saw. 

 

I don't have a good sense as to how often he was used in the passing game (or open) relative to how much he was asked to block.

 

He improved in other ways, of course:

 

His catch % improved markedly, from 54.5% to 69%

So did his yards per target from 6.5 to 8.3

 

His drops stayed constant, 3, which means as a percentage of targets, they improved from 9.1% to 5.6%

Most critically - last year he had 2 fumbles.  This year he did not fumble.

 

I'm not Joe Expert, but to my perception his blocking showed a big improvement this season, as did his route running to the point where they actually were able to line him up as a receiver.  His physicality as a route runner improved markedly, as well.

 

How was he relative to other TE across the league?  I had to pull data from PFR and sort it myself to get this. 

 

Among TE, Knox was:

13th for Y/G with 39

14th for Y/Tgt with 8.3

15th for Y/R with 12

14th for 1D with 41

28th in Catch% (of TE with more than 25 targets) at 69%

Tied for 1st in TD with 9 (4 way tie)

 

So except in TDs, kind of middling

 

Obviously Knox has developed into a competent NFL TE who shows flashes of better.  And some of the above comparison is unfair, as it lumps him in with TE who are primarily WR while Knox is asked to block quite a bit.

 

This is Knox's contract year, and while I think he's worth the $2.7M he'll count against the cap in 2022, does his production merit a big payday?  Being the #12-18 TE would slot him in currently for an AAV around $6.5-8M AAV, or a contract between $16M and $29M

 

IMHO, this is reason to draft a young TE in what is supposed to be a deep TE draft class, because while Knox has improved, it seems to me that he has not yet become that Star TE we were hoping to draft and develop.  He has not become Allen's Kelce or Kittle or Andrews, or even Goeddert or Waller.  He is a good young TE, though.

 

Thoughts?

The Bills are going to have a very tough time keeping all their starters together from here on out. I wouldn't hold a grudge against Knox in any way. He is ALREADY the best TE to suit up in a Bills uniform ever; and it's by a country mile.

 

Go Bills!

Posted (edited)

Third straight year of improving his once horrific drops. Still has plenty of bone head plays - drops, penalties - remember his false start that cost us points in the first Patriots game? He was brutal that day. 

 

Even so with his big breakout this year we are talking. 40-something catches and 500- something yards? That grows on trees with a QB as productive as Allen.  Not worth big money. 

 

We'll see how he improves next season, he's got lots of athletic ability just a rock head.

Edited by ArtVandalay
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...