Alphadawg7 Posted January 28, 2022 Posted January 28, 2022 8 minutes ago, Sheneneh Jenkins said: Thing is though, if added to XP attempt, they would have just went for 2 and likely gotten it. Maybe that's why we see it applied to KO's? They wouldn't have gone for 2. If the penalty can be applied to the XP, then that includes the 2 point conversion, and instead of being attempted from 2 yard line, the yardage penalty would have moved them back way further. Sounds like some are saying it would have been McDs choice to apply to XP or KO (I just thought it was KO), and if that was the case, I assume he applies it to XP to try and increase odds they missed it so they would only need a 3 instead of a TD on the final drive. 1 Quote
Patrick Duffy Posted January 28, 2022 Posted January 28, 2022 2 minutes ago, KzooMike said: It's at the discretion of the coach to take it on the Extra Point or the kickoff. They would have never considered going for two on the 18 yard line if we took the penalty on the extra point. Most coaches take it on the kickoff because it provides a better expected outcome. In this situation I think we probably would have taken it on the extra point given Butker was not having his best game. Oh yeah, I had brain fart there.... Yeah would be 15 added for 2 pt attempt also. My bad Just now, Alphadawg7 said: They wouldn't have gone for 2. If the penalty can be applied to the XP, then that includes the 2 point conversion, and instead of being attempted from 2 yard line, the yardage penalty would have moved them back way further. Sounds like some are saying it would have been McDs choice to apply to XP or KO (I just thought it was KO), and if that was the case, I assume he applies it to XP to try and increase odds they missed it so they would only need a 3 instead of a TD on the final drive. Yeah was just pointed out to me. My mind is slippin lol 1 Quote
Mikie2times Posted January 28, 2022 Author Posted January 28, 2022 https://www.footballzebras.com/2019/09/penalties-on-touchdowns-now-can-cost-1-or-2-points/ 1 Quote
What a Tuel Posted January 28, 2022 Posted January 28, 2022 11 hours ago, bmur66 said: It is sad when we are reduced to whining about a taunting penalty Its not sad. Its part of the healing process. Rehashing the game over and over again is natural. Let people hash it out and heal in their own way. As for the penalty, I saw there was a huge hold towards the end that prevented a sack on Mahomes. Don't remember if it was OT or the 13 second series and i dont want to look, but man was it blatant. Refs apparently weren't gonna be blamed for swaying the greatest game in playoff history one way or the other. Quote
Orlando Buffalo Posted January 28, 2022 Posted January 28, 2022 I am hoping they get rid of way it is called in the future but it is a bad look when a blatant example of it happens and is not called. The officials should not be responsible for policing peace signs. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.