Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
11 minutes ago, BillStime said:


Ah yes Putin - that is you!
 

When you’re done with Poland - will you head towards Czechia? Slovakia?

 

What’s next Tucker? I mean DR?  Oh sorry, I mean Putin.

 

Thats right, PUTIN!!!

 

Meanwhile, precious is deflecting about Ethiopia (so white of you) and China - CHINUHHH!!!

 

Remember when Conald chose not to sanction China over the detention of Muslims in Xinjiang because he was in the "middle of a trade deal" dear? Remember that? 

Go to hell you fascist traitor - we know you Bannon types won’t be happy until WWIII kicks off.

 

image.thumb.jpeg.690ddb98400b976323ee81e8b1e4abea.jpeg


Unhinged projection 

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, BillStime said:

The cult is aligned... always cheering on Putin's new world order.  F'n fascists and traitors.  Right @SCBills?? 

 

 


Nothing you say will make me want to send American troops to war with Russia over Ukraine.  
 

I assume that’s what you want, otherwise I have no clue what you keep whining about. 
 

Edited by SCBills
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, SCBills said:


Nothing you say will make me want to send American troops to war with Russia over Ukraine.  
 

I assume that’s what you want, otherwise I have no clue what you keep whining about. 

 

I know... because the expansion of fascism and authoritarianism is aligned with your beliefs Trump.

 

giphy.gif

 

 

Posted
17 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

I know... because the expansion of fascism and authoritarianism is aligned with your beliefs Trump.

 

giphy.gif

 

 

 

 

Who's bank accounts did Trump freeze?

 

Did Trump declare martial law?  

 

Did Trump say we need to take your freedoms so you can be free?

 

Did Trump call for a State of Emergency when protests were over?

 

Did Trump use corporations to silence you and get compliance to his agenda?

 

Did Trump repeal Obamacare on his own?

 

 

 

Embrace your party's fascism Bill.  It's so bad you're ready to start a war - or let one happen - all to distract from this and Durham 

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

Democrat Fascism - no need to nationalize anything when the corporations all do your party's bidding:

 

 

 

Holy Censorship — Trudeau govt orders Freedom Convoy Youtuber to delete hundreds of videos, immediately…

 

I have used dozens of his videos in stories over the past few days, and suddenly all of them have been deleted.  Mister Sunshine Baby explains what happened in the clip above.

 

This had nothing to do with Youtube.

 

Youtube did NOT remove any of his videos.

 

This was 100% pressure on him personally by the Trudeau government.

 

 

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, BillStime said:


Ah yes Putin - that is you!
 

When you’re done with Poland - will you head towards Czechia? Slovakia?

 

What’s next Tucker? I mean DR?  Oh sorry, I mean Putin.

 

Thats right, PUTIN!!!

 

Meanwhile, precious is deflecting about Ethiopia (so white of you) and China - CHINUHHH!!!

 

Remember when Conald chose not to sanction China over the detention of Muslims in Xinjiang because he was in the "middle of a trade deal" dear? Remember that? 

Go to hell you fascist traitor - we know you Bannon types won’t be happy until WWIII kicks off.

 

image.thumb.jpeg.690ddb98400b976323ee81e8b1e4abea.jpeg

 

Dude, this is the same rationale used to get into Viet Nam.  

 

https://www.fpri.org/article/2017/04/united-states-went-war-vietnam/

 

Quote

Why did the U.S. go to war in Vietnam? This is a question historians continue to debate. One of the main reasons it remains a source of argument is that it is difficult to say when the U.S. war actually began. Should we trace it back to the 1940s when President Harry Truman authorized U.S. financial support of the French war in Indochina? Did it begin in the 1950s when the Geneva Accords divided Vietnam in two and President Dwight Eisenhower offered U.S. aid to help establish a non-communist nation in the southern half to counter the communist north? Eisenhower’s “domino theory,” the idea that if one country in Southeast Asia fell to the communists, the entire region would fall, and the ripple effects would be felt throughout the Asia-Pacific world, informed not only his thinking about U.S. relations with the region but the policymaking of his successors, John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson. Kennedy asserted that Americans would “pay any price, bear any burden” to support democratic nation building as a way to counter communist advances in Asia. During Johnson’s presidency, the U.S. escalated its war in Vietnam, starting with the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution in which Congress authorized Johnson to use military force without declaring war. In March 1965, U.S. Marines landed at Danang.

 

But President Biden doesn't want to send troops right?

 

Quote

If the U.S. failed to step in and help South Vietnam, it would send a message to the rest of Southeast Asia and the world that the U.S. was not truly committed to containing communism. The problem for Johnson was that deep down he didn’t necessarily want to commit U.S. troops to the fight. He believed the South Vietnamese should fight for themselves with American aid and advice. Publicly, though, he and members of his administration, especially Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara, emphasized the strategic importance of South Vietnam. 

 

Those that don't study history are doomed to repeat it.

 

I don't know if you're old enough to remember Viet Nam.  It sucked the big one.

Edited by reddogblitz
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
10 hours ago, dpberr said:

The emergency powers isn't just for Covid protests, just like the Patriot Act wasn't just about 9-11.

 

The "emergency" will most certainly evolve. 

You are correct, more to it. The protesters are led by Maga nuts and so called patriot groups. There is an underlying alternative group, well funded and set on destabilizing. Localizing politicians houses have been attacked, damaged spray painted,cars wreaked, for the last 3 or 4 months. I want all of this type of person dealt with so I support strong measures, used appropriately. Emergency legislation us not required. 

I love good protest, but this is more than that. 

Example...I can agree with Jan 6 protesters message, but not the actions. I have no desire to live in anarchy.

Posted
1 hour ago, Niagara Bill said:

You are correct, more to it. The protesters are led by Maga nuts and so called patriot groups. There is an underlying alternative group, well funded and set on destabilizing. Localizing politicians houses have been attacked, damaged spray painted,cars wreaked, for the last 3 or 4 months. I want all of this type of person dealt with so I support strong measures, used appropriately. Emergency legislation us not required. 

I love good protest, but this is more than that. 

Example...I can agree with Jan 6 protesters message, but not the actions. I have no desire to live in anarchy.

When I do a search for "Canadian politicians homes attacked" I don't find anything other than some items in the past.  Do you have any links to recent reports?  Thx..

Posted
2 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

When I do a search for "Canadian politicians homes attacked" I don't find anything other than some items in the past.  Do you have any links to recent reports?  Thx..

Read Niagara Newspapers, St. Catharines Standard, Niagara Falls Review...

Posted
1 minute ago, Niagara Bill said:

Read Niagara Newspapers, St. Catharines Standard, Niagara Falls Review...

Niagara, those are probably just a few stragglers who only just now watched the last thirteen seconds. 😉

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Niagara, those are probably just a few stragglers who only just now watched the last thirteen seconds. 😉

I wish you hadn't reminded me of that.  I had completely repressed that memory.  Now its back to counseling!  LOL

 

7 minutes ago, Niagara Bill said:

Read Niagara Newspapers, St. Catharines Standard, Niagara Falls Review...

 

Thx.  I'll check that out.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

                                         canada-is-a-free-nation.jpg

 

 

 

Looks like they are changing his mind.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, wnyguy said:

No, no he's just the one taking away liberty from Canadians.

Taking away liberties...what the.....you know the next step of that is....pandemics ending....someone has to stop this!!

Posted
15 minutes ago, TH3 said:

Taking away liberties...what the.....you know the next step of that is....pandemics ending....someone has to stop this!!

Invoking the Emergency Act against peaceful protests is nothing short of tyranny. 

×
×
  • Create New...