BillsFanNC Posted March 23, 2022 Posted March 23, 2022 Can't raise my hand on this one since I am a biologist. I can inform the judge if she needs guidance. 1 1
Chef Jim Posted March 23, 2022 Posted March 23, 2022 On 3/23/2022 at 5:08 PM, DRsGhost said: Can't raise my hand on this one since I am a biologist. I can inform the judge if she needs guidance. Expand Biologist?? I thought you were a screenwriter?? And I love the new screen name and avatar
BillsFanNC Posted March 23, 2022 Posted March 23, 2022 On 3/23/2022 at 5:18 PM, Chef Jim said: Biologist?? I thought you were a screenwriter?? And I love the new screen name and avatar Expand Oops I slipped didn't I? Now everyone knows that I'm a biologist screenwriter. How did everyone like my work on Contagion? 1 1
Boatdrinks Posted March 23, 2022 Posted March 23, 2022 On 3/23/2022 at 4:36 PM, Chef Jim said: What the ***** is wrong with how sausage is made?? Now if you had mentioned Ortolan you would have had a point. Actually how it's eaten is weirder than how it's made. Expand Great Ortolan reference.. haven’t heard of that in awhile. 1
aristocrat Posted March 23, 2022 Posted March 23, 2022 https://www.biologyonline.com/dictionary/female 1. An individual of the sex which conceives and brings forth young, or (in a wider sense) which has an ovary and produces ova. The male and female of each living thing. (Drayton) There ya go.
SoCal Deek Posted March 23, 2022 Posted March 23, 2022 On 3/23/2022 at 5:33 PM, Boatdrinks said: Great Ortolan reference.. haven’t heard of that in awhile. Expand I might have gone with Haggis!
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted March 23, 2022 Posted March 23, 2022 On 3/23/2022 at 4:23 PM, John Adams said: Barrett was highly qualified. Should have been unanimous. Jackson is highly qualified. Should be unanimous. But people need to march in lock step with party. Expand What about the guy, the one before Barrett and Jackson?
John Adams Posted March 23, 2022 Posted March 23, 2022 On 3/23/2022 at 6:15 PM, leh-nerd skin-erd said: What about the guy, the one before Barrett and Jackson? Expand Same. On 3/23/2022 at 5:23 PM, DRsGhost said: Oops I slipped didn't I? Now everyone knows that I'm a biologist screenwriter. How did everyone like my work on Contagion? Expand We are leaving and never coming back.* *Until we come back. 1
TH3 Posted March 23, 2022 Posted March 23, 2022 (edited) On 3/23/2022 at 4:23 PM, John Adams said: Barrett was highly qualified. Should have been unanimous. Jackson is highly qualified. Should be unanimous. But people need to march in lock step with party. Expand Barret may be "qualified" but she should not be on SCOTUS. She has a Catholic Agenda for America and she is there to put it in place - in front of the constitution. Her spitballing reason for overturning Roe? "Well....there are plenty of alternatives like Churches to care for unwanted births...." Edited March 23, 2022 by TH3
John Adams Posted March 23, 2022 Posted March 23, 2022 (edited) On 3/23/2022 at 7:14 PM, TH3 said: Barret may be "qualified" but she should not be on SCOTUS. She has a Catholic Agenda for America and she is there to put it in place - in front of the constitution. Her spitballing reason for overturning Roe? "Well....there are plenty of alternatives like Churches to care for unwanted births...." Expand You're a moran. President picks. Senate advises and consents.* You can decide not to like her but she gets the job because she's eminently qualified, no quotes. Oh, and Roe and Casey are terrible decisions. Abortion should be legal and it should be legislatively decided as such, probably at a state level and if at a federal level, then by Congress. Not too many legal scholars will tell you Roe is well decided. It was a court bending over backwards to legislate. Casey is an inch better. *Except when McConnell says Constitution Shmonstitution. Edited March 23, 2022 by John Adams
Chef Jim Posted March 23, 2022 Posted March 23, 2022 On 3/23/2022 at 7:20 PM, John Adams said: You're a moran. President picks. Senate advises and consents.* You can decide not to like her but she gets the job because she's eminently qualified, no quotes. Oh, and Roe and Casey are terrible decisions. Abortion should be legal and it should be legislatively decided as such, probably at a state level and if at a federal level, then by Congress. *Except when McConnell says Constitution Shmonstitution. Expand It’s better to be old than immature. Carry on kid.
TH3 Posted March 23, 2022 Posted March 23, 2022 On 3/23/2022 at 7:20 PM, John Adams said: You're a moran. President picks. Senate advises and consents.* You can decide not to like her but she gets the job because she's eminently qualified, no quotes. *Except when McConnell says Constitution Shmonstitution. Expand So this is where we are...SCOTUS candidates are cool even if they have been selected to enact an agenda first...follow the costition second? as long as the have the requsitite diplomas? Thats why they are losing credibility every day...they aren't there to interpet the law....they have been chosen to get to result...
John Adams Posted March 23, 2022 Posted March 23, 2022 On 3/23/2022 at 7:24 PM, TH3 said: So this is where we are...SCOTUS candidates are cool even if they have been selected to enact an agenda first...follow the costition second? as long as the have the requsitite diplomas? Thats why they are losing credibility every day...they aren't there to interpet the law....they have been chosen to get to result... Expand You're still a moran. Just because you keep hope of a conspiracy alive doesn't mean it's real.
Chef Jim Posted March 23, 2022 Posted March 23, 2022 On 3/23/2022 at 7:25 PM, John Adams said: You're still a moran. Just because you keep hope of a conspiracy alive doesn't mean it's real. Expand Conspiracy? What in the world are you talking about?
TH3 Posted March 23, 2022 Posted March 23, 2022 On 3/23/2022 at 7:29 PM, Chef Jim said: Conspiracy? What in the world are you talking about? Expand I was just going to ask the same
John Adams Posted March 23, 2022 Posted March 23, 2022 On 3/23/2022 at 7:29 PM, Chef Jim said: Conspiracy? What in the world are you talking about? Expand "She has a Catholic Agenda for America and she is there to put it in place - in front of the constitution. "
Orlando Buffalo Posted March 23, 2022 Posted March 23, 2022 On 3/23/2022 at 7:24 PM, TH3 said: So this is where we are...SCOTUS candidates are cool even if they have been selected to enact an agenda first...follow the costition second? as long as the have the requsitite diplomas? Thats why they are losing credibility every day...they aren't there to interpet the law....they have been chosen to get to result... Expand What decisions has she made that bolster your conspiracy theory? Or do you believe all devout catholics are bad?
SoCal Deek Posted March 23, 2022 Posted March 23, 2022 On 3/23/2022 at 7:24 PM, TH3 said: So this is where we are...SCOTUS candidates are cool even if they have been selected to enact an agenda first...follow the costition second? as long as the have the requsitite diplomas? Thats why they are losing credibility every day...they aren't there to interpet the law....they have been chosen to get to result... Expand Agenda? What you call an agenda is just another persons court case. It’s all how you look at it.
Doc Posted March 23, 2022 Posted March 23, 2022 On 3/23/2022 at 7:14 PM, TH3 said: Barret may be "qualified" but she should not be on SCOTUS. She has a Catholic Agenda for America and she is there to put it in place - in front of the constitution. Her spitballing reason for overturning Roe? "Well....there are plenty of alternatives like Churches to care for unwanted births...." Expand And you're so certain that the 3 SCOTUS' appointed by Dem Presidents don't have an agenda?
Recommended Posts